claremont public schools fy21 budget presentation
play

CLAREMONT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FY21 BUDGET PRESENTATION CSB Budget - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CLAREMONT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FY21 BUDGET PRESENTATION CSB Budget Sub-Committee: Frank Sprague Jason Benware Mike Petrin Richard Seaman Michael Tempesta Ensure delivery of a NO Tax-Payer Increase; neutral budget! Create efficiencies


  1. CLAREMONT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FY21 BUDGET PRESENTATION CSB Budget Sub-Committee: Frank Sprague Jason Benware Mike Petrin Richard Seaman Michael Tempesta

  2. • Ensure delivery of a “NO Tax-Payer Increase”; neutral budget! • Create efficiencies in programming to ensure that ALL students in Claremont have access to a quality education. Expand targeted grade level interventions! • Create robust specialized programming in a LRE that ensure that all CPS students have access to career and college options upon graduation FY21 BUDGET GOALS • Address and rectify historical gaps in programming that greatly disadvantage CPS students (CMS core classes; FY Science and Social Studies) • Mitigate enrollment trends that create inequities in staffing, content delivery and resources within the CPS Elementary Schools • Negotiate four (4) CBAs to ensure a stable, professional work-force, school environments and programs that most benefit students within Strategic Plan and Budget parameters • Create Programs that reduce CPS reliance upon costly Out-of-District Specialized Programming

  3. CLAREMONT SCHOOL DISTRICT ESTIMATED REVENUES FOR FY21

  4. CLAREMONT PUBLIC SCHOOLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FY21 RESTRUCTURING

  5. • Stability and control of class size and staffing assignments • Complete equity for students: All students go to each Elementary School • Stronger, consistent, targeted curriculum, assessment and interventions at each grade level • Universal, All-Day, Pre-K for students age 4 BENEFITS OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL • Unique Programming and Experiential Curriculum Opportunities for entire grade levels RE-STRUCTURING ( Ex: Grade 4 field trip) • Reduced conflicts with age discrepancies in within buildings [ two and three year differentials vs. five years (K-5) ] • Re-allocation of teachers will focus on teacher strengths and program needs (Ex: teachers can focus on grade level content specialties vs. being generalists; content units can be “pushed in.”

  6. FY 20 ELEMENTARY CLASS SIZE CONFIGURATION FY 21 ELEMENTARY CLASS SIZE CONFIGURATION

Recommend


More recommend