CIPFA Statistics 2006 Analysis Results Strategy and Resources Committee 24 May 2007 Shropshire and Wrekin Fire Authority Strategy and Resources Committee 24 May 2007 Document tabled at Agenda Item 7 CIPFA Statistics Analysis
Introduction CIPFA Statistics analysed to benchmark Shropshire Fire and Rescue Service with other English Fire and Rescue Services Service Assessments will expect evidence that we have carried this out. 2
The following two values are quoted on the following graphs: • Correlation Coefficient • Looking for a relationship between the two variables and is expressed between -1 and +1 • Coefficient of Determination R 2 • The certainty of the line of best fit and is expressed between 0 and +1 3
Operational Staff Costs 4
5 Correlation -0 .6 4 0 2 Costs (£1000) per 1000 Population 10 15 20 25 30 35 0 5 London F&EPA Wholetime Merseyside West Midlands Greater Tyne and Wear South Yorkshire Surrey West Yorkshire Cleveland Cheshire 1. Employees Operational Costs WT & RDS Hertfordshire Avon Employee Costs Retained Buckinghamshire Berkshire Durham Leicestershire Bedfordshire Lancashire Nottinghamshire Warwickshire Essex Northamptonshire Humberside Linear (Retained) Derbyshire Kent Hampshire Staffordshire East Sussex North Yorkshire Cambridgeshire Hereford & Dorset Gloucestershire Suffolk West Sussex Oxfordshire Wiltshire Linear (Wholetime) Shropshire Shropshire Norfolk Northumberland Cumbria Lincolnshire Cornwall Somerset Devon Isle of Wight
Wholetime Employee Costs 2. Correlation - Area/Employee Costs (WT) per 1000 Population 35 Costs (£1000) per 1000 Population 30 25 20 15 10 R 2 = 0.1824 SFRS 5 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Hectares (1000's) Correlation -0 .4 2 7 0 6
Retained Duty System Employee Costs 3. Correlation - Area/Employee Costs (RDS) per 1000 Population 10 9 8 Costs (£1000) per 1000 7 population 6 5 4 3 2 R 2 = 0.283 1 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Hectares (1000's) Correlation 0 .5 3 1 9 7
Control Room Employee Costs 4. Correlation - Area/Employee Costs (Control) per 1000 Population 4 4 Costs (£1000) per 1000 3 3 population 2 2 1 2 = 0.0169 R 1 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Hectares (1000's) Correlation -0 .1 2 9 8 8
Officers 9
Population – Area - Officers 5. Relationship between population, area and officers 45 40 35 R 2 =0.8958 A re a /P o p u la tio n /O ffic e rs 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Correlation 0 .9 4 6 5 1/10 Hectares per Person Hectares per Officer Population per Officer 1 Linear (Population per Officer) Expon. (Hectares per Officer) 0
Flexible Duty Officers / Population 7. Correlation All Flexi Duty Officer/Population 300 250 Number of Flexi Officers 2 = 0.6501 200 R 150 100 50 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Population (1000) Correlation 0 .8 0 6 2 BVPI Data Source 11
Area Managers 8. Correlation Area Managers/Population 25 20 Area M anagers 15 10 2 = 0.5952 R 5 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Population (1000) Correlation 0 .5 8 8 3 12
Group Managers 9. Correlation Group Managers/Population 90 80 70 Group M anagers 60 50 40 2 = 0.7133 R 30 20 10 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Population (1000) Correlation 0 .5 4 7 2 13
Station Managers 10. Correlation Station Managers/Population 180 160 140 Statio n M an ag ers 120 100 80 60 2 = 0.7366 R 40 20 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Population (1000) Correlation 0 .6 4 9 5 14
Flexible Duty Officers / Area 11. Correlation All Flexi Duty Officers/Area 120 100 All F lexi Du ty O fficers 80 2 = 0.0069 R 60 40 20 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Hectares (1000) Correlation 0 .0 3 8 9 BVPI Data Source 15
Area Managers 12. Correlation Area Managers/Area 25 20 Area M anagers 15 2 = 0.0137 R 10 5 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Hectares (1000) Correlation 0 .1 1 7 0 16
Group Managers 13. Correlation Group Managers/Area 90 80 70 Group M anagers 60 50 40 2 = 0.0008 R 30 20 10 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Hectares (1000) Correlation 0 .0 1 9 6 17
Station Managers 14. Correlation Station Managers/Area 180 160 140 Station Managers 120 100 80 60 2 = 0.0136 R 40 20 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Hectares (1000) Correlation -0 .0 1 6 7 18
H ectares/Po p u latio n (1000's) p er W M & C M 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 19 London F &EPA W es t M idlands T y ne and W ear Linear (1000s Population per WM&CM) 1000's Hectares per WM&CM M ers ey s ide G reater M anc hes ter C lev eland W es t York s hire Is le of W ight Av on Watch and Crew Managers South York s hire 15. Area/Population per Watch&Crew Manager Berk s hire H ertfords hire Lanc as hire Es s ex Surrey N ottingham s hire Kent H am ps hire Eas t Sus s ex Bedfords hire W es t Sus s ex C hes hire D erby s hire Buc k ingham s hire Staffords hire D ors et H um bers ide Power (1000's Hectares per WM&CM) 1000s Population per WM&CM Leic es ters hire D urham W arw ic k s hire O x fords hire D ev on C am bridges hire N ortham ptons hire Suffolk G louc es ters hire H ereford & W orc es ter W ilts hire N orfolk Som ers et C ornw all Linc olns hire Shrops hire Shrops hire C um bria N orth York s hire N orthum berland
Watch and Crew Managers / Population 16. Correlation WM+CM./Population 1,800 1,600 1,400 Number of WM +CM . 1,200 1,000 800 600 2 = 0.9715 R 400 200 0 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 Population (1000) Correlation 0 .9 8 5 6 20
Watch and Crew Managers / Area 17. Correlation WM+CM/Area 1,800 1,600 1,400 Number of WM+CM. 1,200 1,000 800 R 2 = 0.0167 600 400 200 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Hectares (1000) Correlation 0 .0 1 2 9 21
Firefighters 2 2
Firefighters 18. Relationship between population,area and Ff. 18 16 14 12 P o p u la tio n /W T F f. 10 8 6 4 2 0 S h ro p s h ire 1/10 Hectares per Person 1000 Population per WT Ff. 23 1000 Population per firefighter (WT+RDS) Expon. (1000 Population per WT Ff.)
Firefighters / Population 19. Correlation Firefighters./Population 4,500 Number of Firefighters (WT+RDS) 4,000 3,500 3,000 2,500 Ff. 2,000 1,500 2 = 0.9673 R 1,000 500 0 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 Population (1000) Correlation 0 .9 8 3 5 24
Firefighters / Area 20. Correlation Firefighters./Area 4,500 4,000 Number of Firefighters (WT+RDS) 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 R 2 = 0.0082 1,000 500 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Hectares (1000) Correlation -0 .0 9 0 7 25
Wholetime Firefighters / Population 21. Correlation WT Ff./Population 4,500 4,000 3,500 Number of WT Ff. 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 2 = 0.9736 R 1,000 500 0 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 Population (1000) Correlation 0 .9 8 6 7 26
Wholetime Firefighters / Area 22. Correlation WT Ff.Area 4,500 4,000 3,500 Number of WT Ff. 3,000 2 = 0.0638 R 2,500 2,000 1,500 Shropshire 1,000 500 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Hectares (1000) Correlation -0 .2 5 2 5 27
Retained Duty System Firefighters / Population 23. Correlation RDS Ff./Population 800 700 R 2 = 0.0005 600 Number of RDS Ff. 500 400 300 200 100 0 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 Population (1000) Correlation -0 .2 1 9 2 28
Retained Duty System Firefighters / Area 24. Correlation RDS Ff./Area 800 700 600 Number of RDS Ff. R 2 = 0.4728 500 400 300 200 100 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Hectares (1000) Correlation 0 .6 8 7 6 29
Fire Stations 3 0
Fire Stations / Population 25. Correlation Population/Fire Stns 140 2 = 0.6964 R 120 100 Fire Stations 80 60 40 20 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Population (100,000) Correlation 0 .8 3 4 5 31
Fire Stations (Ex Mets) / Population 25 (a). Correlation Population/Fire Stns (Ex Mets) 70 60 50 Fire Stations 40 30 20 2 = 0.5206 R 10 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 Population (100,000) Correlation 0 .7 2 1 5 32
Fire Stations / Area 26. Correlation Area/Fire Stns 120 100 80 F ire S ta tio n s 60 40 2 = 0.0732 R 20 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Area (hectares 1000) Correlation 0 .2 7 0 6 33
Fire Stations (Ex Mets) / Area 26 (a) Correlation Area/Fire Stns (Ex Mets) 70 60 50 Fire Stations 40 30 2 = 0.3735 R 20 10 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Area (hectares 1000) Correlation 0 .6 1 1 2 34
Premises Expenditure / Fire Stations 27. Premises Expenditure/Stn 200 180 160 140 Expenditure (£1000) 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Average Shropshire 35
Pumps 3 6
Recommend
More recommend
