cea in policies and plans uk case studies
play

CEA in Policies and Plans: UK Case Studies Dr Lourdes M Cooper p - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CEA in Policies and Plans: UK Case Studies Dr Lourdes M Cooper p Senior Environmental Consultant, Hyder Consulting Legislative Requirements for Sustainability Appraisal and Strategic Environmental Assessment European Strategic


  1. CEA in Policies and Plans: UK Case Studies Dr Lourdes M Cooper p Senior Environmental Consultant, Hyder Consulting

  2. Legislative Requirements for Sustainability Appraisal and Strategic Environmental Assessment • European Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Directive (2001/42/EC) ( ) ( ) • Environmental Assessment of Plans and Environmental Assessment of Plans and Programmes Regulations (2004) • Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act (2004)

  3. SA and SEA SA and SEA • SA and SEA are distinct processes • SEA focuses on environmental issues • SA considers social, economic and environmental issues • SA objectives-led approach • Combined SA/SEA process

  4. SA Process Assessment of Cumulative Effects Stage A: Scoping Identify other PPPs and key receptors; Document current status for each key receptor Stage B: • Test plan objectives against SA objectives, Develop and refine Develop and refine highlight cumulative effects highlight cumulative effects options and assess • Assess cumulative effects of options; • Predict and assess cumulative effects of the effects plan policies and proposals on key receptors receptors Stage C: Prepare SA Report cumulative effects in transparent and Report p accessible way and explain accessible way and explain Stage D: Consulting and Use consultation process to help predict and Decision-making g assess cumulative effects Monitor cumulative effects using indicators Stage E: Monitoring and Implementation Implementation

  5. SA Practice Case Study: Seven Sisters Neighbourhood Plan SA Neighbourhood Plan SA • Promote regeneration and guide future development – spatial framework development – spatial framework • Cumulative effects of proposals against SA Objectives g j • Overall positive impacts: provide new green spaces, improve access, promote sustainable modes of promote sustainable modes of transport (cycling and walking) • Negative impacts on employment and Negative impacts on employment and businesses in some areas and use of environmental resources

  6. Appraisal Matrix: Cumulative Effects of Proposals Specific location proposals Cumulativ SASA Objectives e Impact St C C Br G Apex Er Pa Sir Arena, Vale Ne A he ul un ou House mi ig Fra Crusad Rd w nn nn st st ve ve sw sw rle rle & & ne ne nt nt der der er & er & Empl Empl Ri Ri ’s nu rt ick y Stone Pa on ick Omega oym ve ts R Pa Pl bridge rk Pa Me ent r Pa oa rk ac Road rk ss Area rk d e er 1 1 T To reduce crime, disorder and fear of crime d i di d d f f i + + + + + 0 + + + + 0 + + 2 To improve levels of educational attainment for all age 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 + 0 groups and all sectors of society. 3 To improve physical and mental health for all and reduce y + + + + + + 0 + + + + 0 0 + health inequalities. + 4 To provide greater choice, quality and diversity of housing + 0 + 0 + + + 0 + + 0 0 + across all tenures to meet the needs of residents. 5 5 To protect and enhance community spirit and cohesion To protect and enhance community spirit and cohesion. 0 + 0 + + + + 0 0 0 0 0 +

  7. Case Study: Development Brief Silverstone Circuit Masterplan SA • Sit Site covers over 300 ha. 300 h • Development brief to provide guidance on development of site • 24 Policies • Potential cumulative effects of proposed development: – Positive impact on social and economic SA Objectives – Negative impact on air quality, noise, fuel use, waste generation, energy consumption and biodiversity consumption and biodiversity but policies to reduce impacts.

  8. Findings Findings • SA approach – integrated appraisal where social, environmental and economic dimensions of i t l d i di i f sustainability are considered • SA is an objectives led approach – Plan objectives, options and policies/proposals assessed against SA g objectives • Pragmatic, can be done by planners, easily P i b d b l il understood by stakeholders and decision makers • Needs to assess cumulative effects on key receptors more fully

Recommend


More recommend