Cal alif ifornia ornia Sta State Polyt lytechnic hnic Un Univ iver ersity sity, , Pomona mona Mas aster er Pla lan n Up Upda date Workshop orkshop # 1 # 1 - Advis Advisor ory y Com ommitt ittee ee Kic Kick-of off f 08 November 2017
AGEN GENDA Introductions Advisor Advi sory y Com ommitt ittee ee Master Planning Process Campus Master Goals + Priorities including discussion of Priorities Exercises + Visioning Exercise w/ discussion Fall Conference Input (Concerns, Issues, Opportunities) Workshop Session Overview Q+A, Discussion + Next Steps Novembe ember 8, 2017; 12:00-3:00 3:00
ADVIS VISOR ORY Y Stakeholders & Representatives: CO COMMIT MMITTEE TEE Chair Vice President Manning FP&M Staff Support Walter Marquez, Dan Johnson, Julie Tsang ASI and Student Government Farris Hamza and Itzia Salinas Academic Planning & Student Success Sep Eskandari and Terri Gomez Deans Lisa Kessler and Joseph Rencis Academic Senate Chair Julie Shen Enrollment Mgmt & Services Meredith Kelley Student Life & Housing Chris Chisler and Megan Stang Dean of Students Thomas Cruz-Soto Advancement Doug Nelson Campus Health & Wellbeing Leticia Gutierrez-Lopez ASI Executive Director Roosa Millar City of Pomona City Planning Director Disability Resource Center Tracee Passeggi Foundation Aaron Neilson Police Chief Robinson Information Technology Operations Peter Deutsch Institutional Risk & Emergency Mgmt Whitney Fields Transportation and Parking John Lloyd and Mike Biagi Athletics AD Swanson Facilities (Ops, Utilities, Landscape) George Lwin, Richard Farmer, Jesse Ochoa Campus Consulting Architect HMC (Jim Wurst)
Introductions Planning Team: Ayers Saint Gross Jack Black Carolyn Krall Linsey Graff Alex Staneski Principal-in-Charge Project Manager Campus Planner Space Analytics
Ayer ers s Sa Sain int t Gr Gros oss: s: Fi Firm rm Prof Profile ile PHILOSOPY FOCUS “We engage people and All ll of of ou our r places to create designs work ork is is for or that enrich the world.” mis ission sion- driven dri n cl clie ients. nts. FOUNDED STAFF 85% 85% 15% 15% 5% 5% 1912 160 Higher Cultural K-12 and Education Institutions Private Sector
Ayer ers s Sa Sain int t Gr Gros oss: s: Ex Expe pertise tise 200+ 200+ Our expertise comes from the completion of over 200 master plans in the past 25 years for higher education institutions. Abilene Christian University Johns Hopkins University Old Dominion University University of Arizona Kansas State University University of Rhode Island Arizona State University University of Kentucky University of Richmond University of Baltimore Lafayette College University of Rochester Boise State University Lewis University Rutgers University California State University Loyola University Maryland University of San Juan Cal Poly Pomona University of Maryland, University of Scranton College of Charleston University of Massachusetts, SUNY Brockport University of Chicago Montana State University SUNY Oneonta University of Colorado University of New Swarthmore College University of Delaware Hampshire University of Texas at Austin Duke University University of New Mexico, University of Texas at El Gettysburg College University of North Carolina Paso George Mason University University of North Florida Texas A&M University George Washington University of North Texas Texas State University University University of Notre Dame Towson University University of Georgia North West Missouri University of Virginia Harvard Medical School University Northern Arizona Wake Forest University Harvard University, University Hawaii Pacific University Oglethorpe University
Ayer ers s Sa Sain int t Gr Gros oss s Pl Planning anning Ph Philoso ilosoph phy • Fact/Data and Research based • Educational in process and approach • Unique to Cal Poly Pomona’s mission, vision, culture, and strategic plan • Engaging and inclusive of multiple campus and community stakeholders • Iterative, using analysis and planning to advance the plan and build consensus • Narrative shapes the campus vision • Supports informed decision-making • Establishes the foundation for change
Master Planning Process • Role of the Advisory Committee, Executive Committee • Planning Process • Proposed Timeline • Relationship to 2000 Master Plan, 2012 plan, current projects/plans • Campus engagement + Communications • Identifying stakeholders on campus and beyond (City, neighborhoods, community partners)
En Enga gageme gement nt – St Stee eeri ring ng / Adv / Advisor isory y Co Comm mmitt ittee ee
Enga En gagem gemen ent t – St Steer eering ing / Ad / Advi visor sory y Co Comm mmitt ittee ee President’s Cabinet (Executive Committee) Provide Planning Direction Lead Decision-making Master Plan Advisory Committee Represent Stakeholders, Advise, Become Plan Champions Academics (Provost, Deans, Programs) Participate, Provide Input Campus Stakeholder Groups, Interests Be Plan Communicators Facilities Planning Orchestrate, Facilitate Master Plan Team Provide Analysis, Expertise, Content (analysis, plans, options) planners, architects, landscape architects, civil engineers, MEP systems engineers, sustainability experts, transportation engineers, cost estimators
St Step eps s in in th the e Pl Planning anning Process Process Project Kick-Off Observations & Analysis Conceptual Plans Final Plan & Report Area, Hub, Precinct Studies Draft Plan w /Phasing Precinct Studies Draft Plan Final Plan & Report
Project Project Tim imeline eline – Fall all 20 2017 t 7 to F o Fall all 20 2018 8 TODAY
Wh Why y a m a mast aster er pla plan? n? A m mas aster ter pla lan: n: • Creates a vis ision ion for the future which supports the mis issi sion on • Rai aises ses as aspi pirations rations + quality of campus to attract/retain the best • Guid ides es development elopment over time, supporting resilience • Establishes a basis for in informed med decis cision ion-maki making ng going forward • Strengthens rengthens rela lati tion onships ships within the campus + with the community • Result should provide vide a r a road admap map + tools ls for implementation
Pl Planning anning is c is changing hanging St Strat rategic gic Mast ster r Plan Tra raditio ditional nal Master er Plan high level, broad, capacity-oriented; physical, technical, implementation-oriented; leadership drives toward consensus; steered by committees toward consensus; narrative, diagrammatic (specific plans follow) map + reports to guide implementation IN INNOVATIN ING ENGAGIN ING PART RTNERIN ING SYNERG RGY Cal Poly Pomona will be a unique hybrid – aligning the master plan with the strategic plan
Pr Previous vious Ca Cal l Pol oly y Pom omona ona Mas Master er Pl Plan ans 2002 Campus pus Master er Plan 2012 Campus us Master er Plan n Re Revis visio ion 1. Excellence in teaching, learning 1. Concentrated academic campus 2. Effective acquisition, planning, 2. Student engagement + campus experience management of resources 3. Polytechnic university 3. Promote research, scholarly, professional, 4. Pedestrian-oriented campus creative activities 5. Identity 4. Enhance support for students 6. Sustainability 5. Improve campus environment 2012 is a treasure trove of information. Planners can test 2012 ideas again and see if they are still viable
Sp Space Ana ace Analy lytics tics SPACE CE ASSES ESSMEN SMENT T PROCE CESS SS • Data collection + field verification • Facilities, enrollment, course schedule • Existing space distribution + uses • By program, use type • Start with the basics of space • Classroom + class laboratory utilization analysis distribution across the total • Type, size , seats, scheduling university (incl Foundation, etc) • Space assessment + Prioritization of needs • Include analysis of land uses • Baseline year + future scenarios (acreage used for buildings, roads, parking, open space for informal use, • Stakeholder meetings rec/athletic fields, barns and • President, Vice Presidents, Deans, Directors pastures, agriculture/fields, ‘no - build’ • Findings + outcomes steep slopes, etc.) • Utilize SAMi™ to focus/prioritize critical needs
Compo Co mponents nents of of th the e Study Study Future session will include meetings with specific stakeholders to verify information Assessment – what are the future needs? Is it more buildings, or should we use space better? Stakeholder Interviews Next workshop will Utilization / Space Space Needs include preliminary Metrics Assessment analysis All campuses have unique needs – for example, CPP has a large Ag component. What are the space types needed for the future of polytechnic learning? Assessment Data Collection and Alignment with Planning & Analysis Verification Process Outcomes On-going – working together to get accurate information
Recommend
More recommend
