L CAP T e c hnic a l Assista nc e Pre se nta tio n Sta te & F e de ra l Pro g ra ms
Re c o mme nde d T ime line fo r 2015-16 July – Oc to b e r 2015 Id e ntify a nd c o nsult No ve mb e r 2015 - Ja nua ry 2016 sta ke ho ld e rs F e b rua ry - Ma rc h 2016 Co nd uc t ne e d s Co nsult sta ke ho ld e rs a sse ssme nts Co ntinue upd a ting April - June 2016 Re vie w a va ila b le d a ta Co nsult sta ke ho ld e rs pro g re ss o n Annua l fo r Annua l Re po rt Re po rt Re vie w d ra ft L CAP De ve lo p time line fo r Co nsult sta ke ho ld e rs E va lua tio n Rub ric whe n Re vie w L CAP g o a ls, d a ta c o lle c tio n a nd a va ila b le Re vie w Ma y re visio n o f pro po se d Sta te a c tio ns a nd se rvic e s fo r re po rting b ud g e t (2015-16) a nd lo c a l ne e d e d a d justme nts Co ntinue mo d ific a tio n Re po rt d e mo g ra phic implic a tio ns o f L CAP a nd upd a ting Re vie w fina l, SBE - info rma tio n via pro g re ss o n Annua l Invite pub lic c o mme nt o n d ra ft L CAP a ppro ve d L CAP & CAL PADS Re po rt Annua l Re po rt Pre se nt d ra ft L CAP to PACs Re vie w a lig nme nt o f T e mpla te Pre se nt d ra ft L CAP to d istric t pla ns with L CAP Re spo nd to c o mme nts in writing sta ke ho ld e rs, inc lud ing Re vie w pro po se d sta te PACs F ina lize Annua l Re po rt b ud g e t (2015-16) a nd lo c a l implic a tio ns Ho ld L CAP a nd b ud g e t pub lic he a ring Re c e ive lo c a l b o a rd a ppro va l Sub mit to COE Re c e ive L CAPs fro m c ha rte r sc ho o ls L o c a l Co ntro l a nd Ac c o unta b ility Pla ns 2
Guiding Que stio ns fro m L CAP T e mpla te Annua l Upda te 1) Ho w ha ve the a c tio ns/ se rvic e s a ddre sse d the ne e ds o f a ll pupils a nd did the pro visio ns o f tho se se rvic e s re sult in the de sire d o utc o me s? 2) Ho w ha ve the a c tio ns/ se rvic e s a ddre sse d the ne e ds o f a ll sub g ro ups o f pupils ide ntifie d pursua nt to E duc a tio n Co de se c tio n 52052, inc luding , b ut no t limite d to , E ng lish le a rne rs, lo w-inc o me pupils, a nd fo ste r yo uth; a nd did the pro visio n o f tho se a c tio ns/ se rvic e s re sult in the de sire d o utc o me s? 3) Ho w ha ve the a c tio ns/ se rvic e s a ddre sse d the ide ntifie d ne e ds a nd g o a ls o f spe c ific sc ho o l site s a nd we re the se a c tio ns/ se rvic e s e ffe c tive in a c hie ving the de sire d o utc o me s? L o c a l Co ntro l a nd Ac c o unta b ility Pla ns 3
L CAP - Guiding Princ iple s • Pe rforma nc e – foc use d – re la tio nship a mo ng pla ns, funding use , o utc o me s fo r stude nts • Simplic ity a nd tra nspa re nc y • Stude nt- foc use d – lo c a l ide ntific a tio n o f ne e ds, pro vide e q uita b le o ppo rtunitie s • Sta te prioritie s – de fine me tric s b ut re ly o n lo c a l de te rmina tio n o f me a sure me nt • Sta ke holde r e ng a g e me nt -pa re nts, stude nts, e duc a to rs, b ro a de r c o mmunity
Se c tio n 1a nd Annua l Upda te I mplic a tio ns Section 1: Stakeholder Engagement Meaningful engagement of parents, pupils, and other stakeholders, including those representing the subgroups identified in Education Code section 52052, is critical to the LCAP and budget process. Education Code sections 52060(g), 52062 and 52063 specify the minimum requirements for school districts; Education Code sections 52066(g), 52068 and 56029 specify the minimum requirements for charter schools. In addition, Education Code section 58985 specified the requirements for translation of documents. • E duc a tio n Co de 52060 (g ) A g o ve rning b o a rd o f a sc ho o l distric t sha ll c o nsult with te a c he rs, princ ipa ls, a dministra to rs, a nd o the r sc ho o l pe rso nne l, lo c a l b a rg a ining units o f the sc ho o l distric t, pa re nts, a nd pupils de ve lo ping a lo c a l c o ntro l a nd a c c o unta b ility pla n. • E duc a tio n Co de 52066 (g ) ha s the sa me re q uire me nts fo r c o unty o ffic e s o f e duc a tio n L o c a l Co ntro l a nd Ac c o unta b ility Pla ns 5
Se c tio n 1a nd Annua l Upda te I mplic a tio ns Section 1: Stakeholder Engagement Instructions: Describe the process used to consult with parents, pupils, school personnel, local bargaining units as applicable, and the community and how this consultation contributed to development of the LCAP or annual update. Note that the LEA ’ s goals, actions, services and expenditures related to the state priority of parental involvement are to be described separately in Section 2. In the annual update boxes, describe the stakeholder involvement process for the review, and describe its impact on, the development of the annual update to LCAP goals, actions, services, and expenditures. Pre vio usly, the ve rb wa s “ e ng a g e ” a nd no w it is “ c o nsult ” • whic h ma tc he s E duc a tio n Co de 52060. • Adde d to the instruc tio ns a re a ll the pe o ple who a re to b e c o nsulte d, inc luding “ sc ho o l pe rso nne l ” a nd “ lo c a l b a rg a ining units a s a pplic a b le , ” a lso in E duc a tio n Co de 52060. • T he re ma ining c ha ng e s a re re la te d to c a pturing in the re vise d Se c tio n 2 wha t wa s pre vio usly in Se c tio ns 2 a nd 3A a nd 3B. L o c a l Co ntro l a nd Ac c o unta b ility Pla ns 6
Se c tio n 1: Guiding Que stio ns o n Sta ke ho lde r E ng a g e me nt 1. Ho w ha ve a pplic a b le sta ke ho lde rs (e .g ., inc luding pa re nts a nd pupils o f unduplic a te d pupils a nd unduplic a te d pupils ide ntifie d in E duc a tio n Co de 42238.01; c o mmunity me mb e rs; lo c a l b a rg a ining units; L E A pe rso nne l; c o unty c hild we lfa re a g e nc ie s, c o unty o ffic e o f e duc a tio n fo ste r yo uth se rvic e s pro g ra ms, c o urt-a ppo inte d spe c ia l a dvo c a te s, a nd o the r fo ste r yo uth sta ke ho lde rs; c o mmunity o rg a niza tio ns re pre se nting E ng lish le a rne rs a nd o the rs a s a ppro pria te ) b e e n e ng a g e d in de ve lo ping , re vie wing , a nd suppo rt imple me nta tio n o f the L CAP? A ’ s pro c e ss in a 2. Ho w ha ve sta ke ho lde rs b e e n inc lude d in the L E time ly ma nne r to a llo w fo r e ng a g e me nt in the de ve lo pme nt o f the L CAP? L o c a l Co ntro l a nd Ac c o unta b ility Pla ns 7
Se c tio n 1: Guiding Que stio ns o n Sta ke ho lde r E ng a g e me nt (c o ntinue d) 3. Wha t info rma tio n (e .g ., q ua ntita tive a nd q ua lita tive da ta / me tric s) wa s ma de a va ila b le to sta ke ho lde rs re la te d to the sta te prio ritie s a nd use d b y the L E A to info rm the L CAP g o a l se tting pro c e ss? Ho w wa s this info rma tio n ma de a va ila b le ? 4. Wha t c ha ng e s, if a ny, we re ma de in the L CAP prio r to a do ptio n a s a re sult o f writte n c o mme nts o r o the r fe e db a c k re c e ive d b y the L E A A ’ s e ng a g e me nt pro c e sse s? thro ug h a ny o f the L E 5. Wha t spe c ific a c tio ns we re ta ke n to me e t sta tuto ry re q uire me nts fo r sta ke ho lde r e ng a g e me nt pursua nt to E duc a tio n Co de se c tio ns 52062, 52068, a nd 47606.5, inc luding e ng a g e me nt with re pre se nta tive pa re nts o f pupils ide ntifie d in E duc a tio n Co de se c tio n 42238.01? L o c a l Co ntro l a nd Ac c o unta b ility Pla ns 8
Se c tio n 1: Guiding Que stio ns o n Sta ke ho lde r E ng a g e me nt (c o ntinue d) 6. Wha t spe c ific a c tio ns we re ta ke n to c o nsult with pupils to me e t the re q uire me nts 5 CCR 15495(a )? 7. Ho w ha s sta ke ho lde r invo lve me nt b e e n c o ntinue d a nd suppo rte d? Ho w ha s the invo lve me nt o f the se sta ke ho lde rs suppo rte d impro ve d o utc o me s fo r pupils, inc luding unduplic a te d pupils, re la te d to the sta te prio ritie s? L o c a l Co ntro l a nd Ac c o unta b ility Pla ns 9
Se c tio n 1: L CAP T e mpla te Involve me nt Pr oc e ss Impac t on L CAP Identify stakeholder meetings – Attribute actions and services to input from stakeholders Annual Update : Annual Update : L o c a l Co ntro l a nd Ac c o unta b ility Pla ns 10
Se c tio n 1: L CAP T e mpla te Involve me nt Proc e ss Impac t on L CAP At _________ there were a series of opportunities for parents to give FROM DELAC MTGS: input on our school goals and priorities for the coming years. Throughout the school year, students, parents, staff, and community members have Increase advanced class offerings (see Goal 1) had opportunities to provide the site with feedback via surveys, Zero period program to support World Language conversations, and poster gallery walks that present participants with and Arts (see Goal 1) essential questions about how to improve our school's academic Home visits from the school (see Goal 3) program, our school climate and our facilities and programs. More multicultural awareness and community events (see Goal 3) DELAC Meetings September 4, 2015 (23 Parents, 5 staff, 2 administrators) PBIS training for parents (see Goal 4) October 6, 2015 (22 Parents, 6 staff, 2 administrators) Annual Update : Annual Update : DELAC Meetings September 4, 2015 – Reviewed EOY Data and status of implementation EOY Attendance data met goals, DELAC of LCAP services parents recommended continuance and possible expansion of attendance liaison personnel L o c a l Co ntro l a nd Ac c o unta b ility Pla ns 11
Recommend
More recommend
