CA18225 - Taste and Odor in early diagnosis of source and drinking Water Problems (WaterTOP) Triantafyllos Kaloudis Institute of Nanoscience & Nanotechnology, NCSR Demokritos, Greece
The Ninth IWA Symposium on Off-Flavours in the Aquatic Environment: RGU, 14-18 August 2011 Tri Andrea Dietrich Ricard Devesa Linda Lawton Chr. Edwards
Water T&O Workshop, 10-12 May 2017, Istanbul University Chris Avagianos Reyhan Akcaalan Tri Latife Koker Zuhal Tunc Meric Albay (Taking the photo)
WaterTOP - Main directions How can we manage the T&O problems in water? ▪ Sensory evaluation ▪ Chemical analysis, identification, diagnosis. ▪ Risk assessment, impacts. ▪ Prevention, control measures. Can T&O serve as early warning for water quality problems? ▪ Geosmin, MIB and cyanotoxins? ▪ Off-odors and industrial pollution incidents? ▪ Citizen science? ▪ Sensors
WaterTOP - Structure
WaterTOP – Key WG tasks/activities WG1 WG2 WG3 WG4 Sensory analysis Chemical analysis Risk assessment Water Treatment Consumers’ perceptions GC-MS, GCxGC, GC-HRMS Roles of T&O AOPs for T&O Taste & Odour Wheel (TOW) GC-Olfactometry - MS Impacts of T&O UV/Cl 2 , UV/H 2 O 2 , UV/O 3 Flavor Profile Analysis (FPA) Isotope dilution (SIDA) Materials in contact Transformation Products Standardization Database of T&O Water Safety Plans GAC/PAC All Working Groups Training schools STSMs Workshops Dissemination Network open to experts, stakeholders, countries. Open to new ideas or to improve/modify plans.
WaterTOP – Key Deliverables
WaterTOP – Geographic coverage (28/8/2019) ITC: USA (Andrea Dietrich) Canada (Arash Zamyadi) Australia (Richard Stuetz)
WaterTOP - Expertise in MC WG1 Sensory WG4 Treatment 12, 15.0% 17, 21.3% WG2 Chemical analysis 21, 26.3% WG3 Risk 30, 37.5%
WaterTOP – MC member affiliations Government/Associations 4, 6.2% Utilities and companies 9, 13.8% Universities Research 38, 58.5% 14, 21.5%
WaterTOP – Gender balance in MC Male 41.9% Female 58.1%
WaterTOP – Acknowledgements Many thanks to: ▪ Proposers for contributions and help during the proposal stage. ▪ Anonymous reviewers for positive feedback. ▪ COST Association for organizing the review and for funding the proposal. ▪ COST Officers, Dr. Deniz Karaca (Science) and Sarah Ninane (Administration) for taking over our Action and for organizing this meeting !
Recommend
More recommend