building resilience in the st pete chha
play

BUILDING RESILIENCE IN THE ST. PETE CHHA ULI TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

BUILDING RESILIENCE IN THE ST. PETE CHHA ULI TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PANEL (TAP) TUESDAY, JUNE 18 TH & WEDNESDAY, JUNE 19 TH , 2019 URBAN LAND INSTITUTE MISSION STATEMENT T O PROVIDE LEADERSHIP IN THE RESPONSIBLE USE OF LAND AND IN CREATING


  1. BUILDING RESILIENCE IN THE ST. PETE CHHA ULI TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PANEL (TAP) TUESDAY, JUNE 18 TH & WEDNESDAY, JUNE 19 TH , 2019

  2. URBAN LAND INSTITUTE MISSION STATEMENT “T O PROVIDE LEADERSHIP IN THE RESPONSIBLE USE OF LAND AND IN CREATING AND SUSTAINING THRIVING COMMUNITIES WORLDWIDE .”

  3. ULI ADVISORY SERVICES D ELIVER FRESH INSIGHTS AND DISCOVER INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS • TO REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT & LAND USE CHALLENGES . P ROVIDE CANDID AND UNBIASED INPUT FROM EXPERT LAND USE • PROFESSIONALS WHO VOLUNTEER THEIR TIME AND EXPERTISE . • K ICK - START CRITICAL CONVERSATIONS AND DELIVER RESULTS .

  4. TAP PANELISTS • J IM C LOAR , D OWNTOWN D EVELOPMENT S TRATEGIES (TAP C HAIR ) • C HRIS A HERN , A PPLIED T ECHNOLOGY & M ANAGEMENT • M ICHAEL A NTINELLI , B RIZAGA , I NC • L EIGH F LETCHER , F LETCHER & F ISCHER • N ICK H ERRING , F RAMEWORK G ROUP • M ANUELA P OWIDAYKO , C ITY OF N EW Y ORK • K RISTINE R ETETAGOS , KAST C ONSTRUCTION • W HIT R EMER , IBHS • T ARYN S ABIA , USF S CHOOL OF A RCHITECTURE & D ESIGN • J EREMY S HARP , C ITY OF N ORFOLK • S IOBHAN O’K ANE , ULI E XECUTIVE D IRECTOR • J ENNA W YLIE , ULI M ANAGER

  5. TAP QUESTIONS 1. E VALUATE THE DRAFT ZONING STANDARD AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND : A. I DENTIFY ADDITIONAL “ REQUIREMENTS ” THAT MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS MUST INCLUDE WHEN CONSTRUCTING WITHIN THE CHHA , REGARDLESS OF AN INCREASE IN DENSITY . i. (F OR EXAMPLE , THE C ITY OF N ORFOLK COMPONENTS / CATEGORIES ARE R ISK R EDUCTION , S TORMWATER M ANAGEMENT , E NERGY R ESILIENCE . C REATE SOME CATEGORIES THAT ARE MORE S T . P ETERSBURG CENTRIC .) - B. E STIMATE THE COSTS OF THE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS . C. A SSIGN A “ WEIGHT ” TO EACH REQUIREMENT AND DEVISE A “ MINIMUM NUMBER OF POINTS NEEDED ” SCORECARD ( FOR EACH COMPONENT / CATEGORY ). D. E XAMINE THE PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT , INCLUDING INTRODUCING BALANCING CRITERIA 2. P ROVIDE OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS PERTAINING TO THE DRAFT CHHA STANDARD AND INTRODUCING INCREASED DENSITY IN THE CHHA.

  6. THE NORFOLK RESILIENCE QUOTIENT C REATED THE NEW ORDINANCE IN 2018 • G OAL OF BUILDING RESILIENCE TO ADDRESS FLOODING , ETC • R ESILIENCE QUOTIENT IS APPLIED CITY - WIDE • • R ISK R EDUCTION • S TORMWATER MANAGEMENT E NERGY R ESILIENCE • P URSUING THE POINT SYSTEM IS ONLY 1 OF 4 PATHWAYS FORWARD • • O THER P ATHWAYS F ORWARD : • E LEVATE 16” AND C APTURE 1.25 INCHES OF STORMWATER • LEED GOLD OR EQUIVALENT EXEMPTION • HISTORIC REHAB EXEMPTION E XTRA POINTS REQUIRED IN HIGH HAZARD AREA •

  7. 4 PATHWAYS TO MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT IN THE CHHA POINTS SYSTEM: LEED Gold Certification: + Elevation Requirements + Elevation Requirements + Points in All 4 Components + Points for “Recovery” + Points threshold based on # of units Workforce Housing: Historic Structures: + Evacuation Plan + Elevation Requirements + Points for “Recovery” + Points for “Recovery”

  8. CHHA MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS COMPONENTS OF IMPACT Structural Mitigation Energy Nature-Based Mitigation Recovery

  9. STRUCTURAL MITIGATION lopment Act ivity Value Expected Cos t Component 1: Structural Mitigation Requ ired + Add itional elevation above IFB high high Mach inery or equ ipment servicing (including eme rge ncy generato r) required + additional elevat ion of FB will generate additiona l points high low Construc t an impact-resistant and fully adhe red root high low Design building located in the Coasta l A Flood Zo ne to Flood Zone V standards high high Wi11 d des ign upgrade / App ly high velocity standa rds high high a. 10-t MP H B. 20+ MIPH Innovat ion lilrili1 Urban Land l!!!J Institute Tampa Bay

  10. ENERGY Deve lopme nt Act ivity Value Expected Cost Component 2: Energy Efficiency On site renewab le energy sou rces high high a. 5-10% reduct ion b. 11-20% reduc tion c. 21-30% reduct ion 75% resident ial and com mon areas cond itioned by geothe rmal (ex: The Pea rl, Tampa ) med high On-s ite battery storage of solar gene rated powe r w ith X amo unt of capac ity med high Install cool roof to reduce heat absorpt ion low low Pre-w ire all units to accept powe r provided by on-s ite solar panels and/or wind turbines low low Install a 20+ SEER HVAC system in each dwe lling unit med med Install a 16-19 SEER HVAC system in each dwe lling unit med med Zone contro lled heating and cooling (effic iency) med med Install a solar or tank -less wate r heat ing system in , each un it low low Cross ventilation for each unit {no less than 2 open ings on different walls) low low Install high ly-reflective blinds/shades or w indow film/tint to reduce solar gain low low

  11. NATURE BASED Development Activity Value Expected Cost Component 3: Nature Based Solutions I I Protect coastal property w1 ith a living shoreline (LSL). Reference USAGE med med I I Green Roof med med I Natural Buffer: Setbacks are det 1 ermined by zoning. Extra points for nature-based featu re in addition to setback . (ex: stormwater) med low I I a. Stormwater Retentio n I •1 b. Approp riate and beneficial plantings (native, droug ht tolerant , salt adapted ) 1; contribution to conservat ion fund in lieu of ability to achieve Comp. 3 high med Innovation lilrili1 Urban Land l!!!J Institute Tampa Bay

  12. RECOVERY Development Activity ______ Value Expected Cost Component 4: Recovery I -I Illumination and natural daylighting high low I Install a generator for power generation to keep critical functions • I (refrigerator, freezer, basic lighting, healthcare appliances, etc.) working in the event of power failure high high I I a. life safetyl I I b. refrigerator 1 point I I c. HVAC common area 1 point -I • I I Resiliency hubs low low I Community room/shelter low low • Upr, grades to (m contribution to fund) and existing shelter high med Innovation Points lilrili1 Urban Land l!!!J Institute Tampa Bay

  13. COST AND VALUE

  14. COST AND VALUE 1r) sze511,l~fJOI - . ...... ... ... ,:... ~- :;. , :,. D Urban Land Institute Tampa Bay

  15. NEXT STEPS R EFINE G OALS & VALUES FOR R ESILIENT D EVELOPMENT • C ONSIDER C ONDUCTING V ULNERABILITY A SSESSMENTS FOR THE CHHA • S OCIAL VULNERABILITIES , SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS ( SES ), TRANSPORTATION • DISADVANTAGED , HOUSING YEAR BUILT , ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS • I N ADDITION TO CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE • ALIGN CITY ’ S GOALS & VALUES FOR RESILIENT DEVELOPMENT WITH ULI’ S VALUATION FOR POINT STRUCTURE

  16. THANK YOU , \illll lilrili1 Urban Land TAMPABAY@ULI.ORG l!!!J Institute Tampa Bay

  17. [A] [1] PRIORITY 1.2 [B] 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 [4] 0.2 0 17.8 18 18.2 18.4 18.6 18.8 19 19.2

Recommend


More recommend