building it right
play

Building It Right Dennis Dvorak FHWA Resource Center July 27, 2017 - PDF document

8/14/2017 Building It Right Dennis Dvorak FHWA Resource Center July 27, 2017 Bob Conway FHWA Resource Center Formula One Track in Austin, TX 1 8/14/2017 Todays Topics A primer on 23 CFR 637 FHWA QA Assessment NHI Course


  1. 8/14/2017 Building It Right Dennis Dvorak FHWA Resource Center July 27, 2017 Bob Conway FHWA Resource Center Formula One Track in Austin, TX 1

  2. 8/14/2017 Today’s Topics  A primer on 23 CFR 637  FHWA QA Assessment  NHI Course 131141  Warranties  Why Incentives?  Regional Groups 4 A Primer on 23 CFR 637 Core Elements of a Quality Assurance Program Agency Acceptance Personnel Dispute Qualification Resolution QA Program Lab Independent Qualification Assurance Contractor QC 2

  3. 8/14/2017 Sources of Variability Testing Material Process Sampling Composite Variability Quality Assurance Program  Includes six core elements  Provides overall framework for QA implementation  Delineates roles and responsibilities  Approval required by FHWA Division Office  23 CFR 637.205 (a) 23 CFR 637  Revised June 29, 1995  Allowed use of contractors tests in acceptance decision  Required qualified personnel and labs by June 29, 2000 3

  4. 8/14/2017 July 17, 1998 FHWA Memo on Technician Qualification  Formal training of personnel including all sampling and testing  Hands-on training to demonstrate proficiency of all sampling and testing to be performed,  A written examination and the demonstration of the various sampling and testing methods,  The following are not appropriate criteria for achieving or maintaining qualification status:  Grandfathering  Professional Engineer  Lifetime qualification. Why Only Require Certifications for Testers?  Regulation revised to allow use of contractors tests in acceptance decision  Justify all changes to regulations Agency Responsibility for Acceptance  All acceptance activities must be carried out by the Agency or their designated agent  Agency must independently inspect and test for Acceptance  Contractor QC data may be used in Agency Acceptance decision 12 4

  5. 8/14/2017 Use of Contractors Tests 33 Contractors Tests Used in Acceptance Decision 19 State Tests Used for Acceptance TX Puerto Rico Quality Assurance Assessment 5

  6. 8/14/2017 Assessment of RISK  18 Questions…  Risk of Contractor Fraud and Appropriate Payment  Not tied to Regulatory Compliance  Covers the Six Building Blocks of QA  Questions Weighted  1, 2, 3, 5, & 7  Frequency  52 in FY 2008, 2010, 2012, 2014 and… 2017 AA IA PQ/C 16 DR QC LA/Q Assessment Elements Higher Risk Factors – Weights of 5 or 7 Personnel Qualification Project Field Labs Dispute Resolution Independent Assurance Random Sampling Validation Process Control of Sample Locations Lower Risk Factors – Weights of 1, 2, or 3 Visual Acceptance Sample Location PWL NTPEP Materials Management Risk Analysis for PWL Quality Characteristics Lot Size Continuous Equations Independent Assurance Question  Does the State use a System approach with an Annual Report that shows that the Agency covered at least  90 percent of the technicians once a year 18 6

  7. 8/14/2017 Type of Independent Assurance System 35 30 25 Number of States 20 Project System 15 Hybrid 10 5 0 FY2014 19 NHI Course 131141 Quality Assurance for Highway Construction Projects Warranties 7

  8. 8/14/2017 State Experience Florida  Value Added  3 year guarantee  Contactor cannot bid for 6 months if warranty work not completed Types of Warranties  Materials and Workmanship  Performance  Short-Term (Less than 10 years)  Long-Term (10 years and more) 8

  9. 8/14/2017 Why Incentives?  Motivate contractors to improve quality  Fairness  Positive approach  Factor into bidding  Differentiate contractors that produce “desirable” and “undesirable” quality work  When incentives are included, they should be sufficient to encourage contractor innovation Payment Plan with 5% Incentive Pay Factor (%) PF=0.5PWL + 55 AQL RQL Estimated PWL Payment Plan with Incentive AQL=90 80 90 100 Estimated PWL Pay Pay Disincentive Incentive 95 100 105 Pay factors 9

  10. 8/14/2017 Payment Plan without Incentive PF=100 Pay Factor (%) PF=0.5PWL + 55 AQL AQL RQL Estimated PWL Payment Plan without Incentive AQL=90 80 90 100 Estimated PWL No Pay Incentive Disincentive 95 100 105 Pay factors Payment Plan without Incentive AQL=90 80 90 100 Estimated PWL Pay 98 Disincentive 95 100 105 Pay factors 10

  11. 8/14/2017 Regional Groups TC3 Regional Groups Inspector & Technician Qualification/Certification WAQTC M-TRAC NETTCP MARTCP SETFTTQ FHWA Questions 11

Recommend


More recommend