Building a Pathway to Advance Alaskan Inuit Food Sovereignty 2019 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Building a Pathway to Advance Alaskan Inuit Food Sovereignty 2019 ATCEM Presentation by: Vernae Angnaboogok November 2019

ICC ’ s International Engagements • CAFF • UNFCC • EPPR • SDWG • UNFPII • AMAP • PAME • EMRIP • CBD • SAON • UNDRIP • Commission on Human • Circumpolar • CITIES Rights Inuit Wildlife • UNESCO • Mercury Committee & Network Expert Group • WHO • Circumpolar • POPS Expert • IMO Inuit Health Group • FAO Steering • RAMSAR Committee • WIPO • UNEP (incl. • IPS INC) Photo: Jackie Cleveland

Our Mandate 2018 Utqiagvik Declaration • International Indigenous Human Rights and International Partnerships • Food Security Photo: Brian • Families and Youth • Health and Wellness • Education and Language • Indigenous Knowledge • Sustainable Wildlife Management • Environment • Sustainable Development • Communication and Capacity Building Photo: Jackie Cleveland

The four Alaskan Inuit regions that ICC Alaska advocates on behalf. This is the homeland of 83 villages of which there are 96 federally recognized Tribes across the four regions.

Our Inuit Ecosystem

Alaska Inuit Food Security is the natural right of all Inuit to be part of the ecosystem, to access food, to care-take, protect, and respect all of life, land, water, and air. Photo: Jacki Clevland

Food Sovereignty is the right of Alaskan Inuit to define our own hunting, gathering, fishing, land and water policies; the right to define what is sustainably, socially, economically and culturally appropriate for the distribution of food and to maintain ecological health; the right to obtain and maintain practices that ensure access to tools needed to obtain, process, store and consume traditional foods. Photo by Mary Sage

Alas laskan In Inuit Food So Sovereignty In Init itia iativ ive Project Go Goal: l: To unify Alaskan Inuit through initiating a collective movement towards food sovereignty by developing an Alaskan Inuit Food Sovereignty Management Action Plan that advances traditional resource management practices.

Project Objectives 1. By the end of 24 months, Alaskan Inuit will unify and begin a collective movement towards attaining Food Sovereignty through convening 3 regional meetings and one statewide Summit to lay the foundation for creating an Alaskan Inuit Food Sovereignty Management Action Plan. 2. By the end of the 24th month, Alaskan Inuit will have completed the report from the Alaskan Inuit Food Sovereignty Summit and the Alaskan Inuit Food Sovereignty Management Action Plan. 3. By the end of 36 months, communications and outreach products promoting the Alaskan Inuit Food Sovereignty Strategy and Implementation Plan, including radio PSAs, video shorts for social media platforms, promotional flyers, and featured stories for relevant publications, will developed and disseminated throughout Alaskan Inuit communities and more Alaskan Inuit will join the movement.

Utqiagvik & Bethel Steering Committee Meetings • Doreen Fog-Leavitt, Inupiat Community of the Arctic Slope • Willie Goodwin, Maniilaq Association • Mary David, Kawerak, Incorporated • Jennifer Hooper, Association of Village Council Presidents • Nicole Kanayurak, North Slope Borough • Nathan Hadley, Jr., Northwest Arctic Borough • Marvin Okitkun, Alaska Beluga Whale Committee • Arnold Brower, Jr., Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission • Taqulik Hepa, Alaska Migratory Bird Co-Management Council • Millie Hawley, Alaska Nannut Co-Management Council • Vera Metcalf, Eskimo Walrus Commission • Billy Adams, Ice Seal Committee • James Nicori, Kuskokwim River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission • James Stotts, ICC Alaska President • Merlin Koonooka, ICC Alaska Elder Board Member • Chris Apassingok, Youth representative • Thomas Napageak, Jr., Hunter representative from the North Slope Region

 Regulations Too many  Too restrictive  Opportunistic hunt with regulations o Emperor geese example, 3-4 years ago hunters were in Barriers to trouble and hunting gear was confiscated  Conflict with timing of seasons  Fragmented, Numerous Divides us Advancing  Structures of Management Different priorities not aligned or co-created  Terminology used not aligned with us  Lack of true understanding of resources Alaskan In Inuit  Barriers differ per region  Lack of communication  Lack of Authority or Voice Lack of management or even co-management authority Food  No partnership at or with the State  We are often viewed as a stakeholder  Lack of respect in discussions Sovereignty  Lack of respect for Indigenous Knowledge  Co-management is not co-equal management  Federal Unpredictable and divided  Trying to have authority in user agreements (i.e. beluga, polar bear)  However, feds have been easier to work with than the state  Funding Structure of funding  Linear siloed organizations and agencies  No adequate funding, staffing, and legal assistance  Other Japan pulling out of the International Whaling Commission (IWC)

Sh Shared Visio ision to Advance Ala laskan Inu Inuit it Food So Sovereig ignty  Management Would not be so confusing  Varies from village to village, down to the details, specific rules  Need for modern management, research game management together with Inuit traditional management  Meshing Indigenous management with what “they” are doing, make it understandable  Current framework needs to change to support adaptive management: seasons, changing environment, our own ways of identifying when to go out and hunt  Combination of Inuit, federal , state, international management needs to come together  There are different practices in different areas over time  Need management to take account for sharing, preparation, butchering, processing  Need for new, out of the Bring old and new ways together  box thinking eye opening for our youth to identify and be able to learn/practice what our ancestors have laid down for us  Their (Outside managers) views of hunting does not capture the spiritual/cultural underpinning, hunting is way more for us than what they define, Spiritual, cultural, family.  Management needs to We need International collaboration on wildlife management, cross border organizing within an be done at the global ecosystem  level- Inuit ecosystem We need cooperation  management Need partnerships across boundaries

Sh Shared Visio ision to Advance Ala laskan Inu Inuit it Food So Sovereig ignty  Indigenous Knowledge We have access to the best information about our animals, their health and population numbers  Focus on what is taught to youth by elders o Example: Take only what you need or what you can share with elders/widows  Utilizing IK to build better plans for research - population estimates etc.  If we were managing a lot more of the management roles would be filled by our own people (scientists, researchers, etc.) o Example: in Canada you have to get permission from Inuit. With the Inuvialuit Game Council (IGC) they define what and who will be involved.  Too often we are told you don’t have “the skills, capacity, capability to do it.” We have precedence, and it is already being done. (Canada & Greenland)  Important to share our knowledge across borders o Example: sharing knowledge about whaling with communities who are having a hard time  Ownership of unwritten laws Governs over resource management  Self-governance with no outside imposed restrictions – we know our own restrictions  Documentation of customary laws- proof of how we have managed years before the government took over  Set the rules and the foundation to Ugruk tagging example, showing them we are in the lead, listen to us or nothing will be done right  manage our own resources In our traditional ways to hunt, it was cooperation of hunting together – reducing struck and loss. Quotas changed mindset/ways.  Use our traditions and values to create Tribal ordinances  Education Bring back families teaching and giving youth an opportunity to learn from experienced hunters and family, preparing both roles – men and women  Bring back a lot of our culture  Put pressure on parents  Ensure no one is left behind – make pathways for those without a pathway to learn

Ala laskan In Inuit Food Sovereignty Summit “ Akarpagmun Neqkaput ” “ Neqevut Tazimavek ” “ Niqivut Taimu f a ” “ Neqkarkaput Akwarpak ” OU OUR FOOD FOREVER - Sep September 10 10-12, 2019 2019 – Nom ome, Alas aska

Alaskan In Inuit Food Sovereignty Summit “We need to be at the management tables as equals, rather than as advisors.” “Our Strengths: We have common customs, traditions, cooperation and teamwork, spirituality, celebrations, sharing (across our four regions).” “We take only what we need. We are natural conservationists. Our approach is the ecosystem approach and considers everything is related, our people are part of the environment. Our food activities provide health, wellness, and spirituality.” “Everything we do through our Indigenous Knowledge” “Co -management must be done through consensus. We must have the right to say NO.” “True co -management will bring back unity to our people. Our people want this change, everybody wants this.” “