bringing clarity to complex problems
play

Bringing Clarity to Complex Problems The Sustainable Systems - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Bringing Clarity to Complex Problems The Sustainable Systems Integration Model (SSIM ) EnergyVision Energy Huntsville 21 April 2015 Mark Handley, PE Annika Moman, CEM Vice President Associate Vice President Federal Programs Energy &


  1. Bringing Clarity to Complex Problems The Sustainable Systems Integration Model (SSIM™ ) EnergyVision Energy Huntsville 21 April 2015 Mark Handley, PE Annika Moman, CEM Vice President Associate Vice President Federal Programs Energy & Power

  2. Balancing Sustainability Unfunded Mandates with Mission Requirements is a Complex Undertaking Cost ($) Net Zero ROI vs. Simple Payback Baseline Data Color of Money & Silo Agency Energy Funding Organization Cyber Security Mandates Options Infrastructure Needs Mission ESPC, UESC, ECIP, SRM? Savings Persistence Sustainable Systems Integration Model (SSIM™) 2

  3. AECOM’s Integrated Approach to Energy Planning : Six Key Principles • Identify broad goals & desired outcomes Visioning & Goal 1 • Explore discuss key challenges / needs and Setting explore opportunities • Refine goals throughout EnergyVision process • Perform compliance & gap analysis against goals Quantification & 2 • Establish performance metrics (% reduction, ROI, Metrics etc.) • Identify trends, opportunities, and focus areas • Whole systems view Whole System • Integrate available funding streams / options 3 Integration & to maximize return on investment Optimization • “Big - Picture” connection to details • Compliance with overarching vision and goals • Optimize inter-related system efficiencies & relationships Sustainable Systems Integration Model (SSIM™) 3

  4. AECOM’s Integrated Approach to Energy Planning : Six Key Principles • Simulations and ‘What If’ scenarios • Anticipate changing requirements 4 Options & • Alternatives Evaluation – Game boarding Strategies Scenarios • Total ownership cost (TOC) • Life cycle cost analysis Sustainable • Impacts and benefits on operations & 5 Economics maintenance costs, future capital costs, and utility tariffs / rates. • Integrated cost-benefit analysis by scenario Prioritized Actions, • Projects Prioritization and Phasing 6 Implementation • Funding and Implementation Strategies • Refine program vision & strategies Strategies & • Establish performance and monitoring Monitoring Plan strategies and metrics Sustainable Systems Integration Model (SSIM™) 4

  5. AECOM’s SSIM™ Energy Vision Process: Identifying and Evaluating Scenarios Facility Retrofit Strategy Interactive Game Board: Selecting Options Options A B C D E F G Implement LID New Building Demolish Project Buildings Solar Farm EUL Convert Paved to Add Internal Natural Area Shuttle Bus Sustainable Systems Integration Model (SSIM™) 5

  6. AECOM’s SSIM™ EnergyVision Tool Simulation Modeling • Enables client engagement • Interactive game board • Scenario Planning “What if” • Optimized solution sets • Balances complex/ competing goals Sustainable Systems Integration Model (SSIM™) 6

  7. The SSIM™ Approach: Scenario Results: Measuring Performance Sustainability Performance – What you Get! Key Performance Indicators Gap Analysis Synergies and Conflicts between Systems Priority Strategies Sustainable Systems Integration Model (SSIM™) 7

  8. SSIM™ EnergyVision Benefits of Scenario Based Energy Planning • Streamlined whole systems integration that simplifies complex decision making while maximizing return on investment • Enables effective decision making process through the generation of quantitative and qualitative outputs • Integrates project planning and execution strategies through a project “life cycle” approach • Establishes performance metrics for project measurement and verification and monitoring based commissioning Sustainable Systems Integration Model (SSIM™) 8

  9. Case Study: SPAWAR Systems Center, Pacific • Client Overview • SSC PAC is the U.S. Navy’s premier research, development, testing and evaluation, engineering and fleet support center for ocean surveillance, command and control, and communication systems. • San Diego facility includes over 225 buildings with a combined workspace of 3,032,000 square feet. • SSC PAC spends over $5M per year in utilities and operations and maintenance. • Energy Program Goals • Enables SSCPAC to exceed federally mandated energy / water goals. • Leverage project’s cost savings to address critical infrastructure issues. • Develop, Finance and Implement a multi-phase ESPC project that when bundled together will fit within a 20 year financing term. • Collaborate with the SSCPAC team throughout the development process to ensure the project fully supports mission requirements. Sustainable Systems Integration Model (SSIM™) 9

  10. Case Study: SPAWAR Systems Center, Pacific • Solution • Utilized SSIMe Energy Vision process to develop four self-funding task orders that met SSCPAC’s vision and goals. • Collaborated over eight month development phase to identify/select projects, evaluate technical and financial options, and to identify optimized project bundles. • Program Results • Implemented $34.5M in energy, water, and infrastructure upgrades over a four year period (four task orders) • Secured over $1.7M in utility incentives • Reduced annual operating costs by $2.1M • Recapitalized critical infrastructure and improved resiliency to meet mission requirements. • Reduced installation energy intensity by 35% and exceeded all federal and energy and water reduction mandates Sustainable Systems Integration Model (SSIM™) 10

  11. Case Study: SPAWAR Systems Center, Pacific Over $3.5M in annual energy and operational savings have funded $40.0M in energy and infrastructure upgrades. Sustainable Systems Integration Model (SSIM™) 11

  12. SSIM™ Project Example: Guam Joint Military Base Sustainability Master Program APA (Federal Division) Outstanding Sustainable Planning Award, 2011 Sustainable Systems Integration Model (SSIM™) 12

  13. Annika Moman Mark A. Handley, PE Associate Vice President Vice President, Federal Programs Energy & Power RADM, CEC, USN (ret) (703) 682-9072 D 757-306-6725 Annika.Moman@aecom.com Mark.Handley2@aecom.com #1 Top 150 Global Design Firms #1 Top 500 Design Firms #1 Pure Design #1 Transportation #1 General Building Mass Transit/Rail 1 Airports 1 Marine and Port Facilities 1 Architecture 3 Power 1 Bridges 2 Pure Design 1 Chemical & Soil Remediation 3 Retail Facilities 2 Commercial Offices 1 Sanitary and Storm Sewers 2 Correctional Facilities 1 Solar Power 1 Education 1 Sports Facilities 1 General Building 1 Transmission and Distribution 3 Government Offices 2 Transmission Lines 1 Green Design 3 Transportation 1 Health Care Facilities 1 Wastewater Treatment Plants 2 Highways 1 Hydroplants 1

  14. SSIM™ Project Example: Guam Joint Military Base Sustainability Master Program • Program • Design Specifications • Implementation Toolkit Sustainable Systems Integration Model (SSIM™) 14

  15. The SSIM™ Integrated Approach to Sustainability Towards Innovative + Transformative Solutions from To Complex, Opaque  Transparent, well organized Decision Process and documented  Energy Focus Holistic multi-system focus Bundles/Packages; Net People  Single Project Value of multiple efforts; Scalable solutions ROI and Payback  multi-dimensional criteria – focus “a new Math” Strategic Sustainability Reactive Planning /  Planning (Predictive, Monitoring Scenario based) Independent silo-like  Collaborative and Integrated operations across Enterprise Sustainable Systems Integration Model (SSIM™) 15

  16. AECOM’s Integrated Approach to Sustainability Sustainability Decision Modeling Framework Sustainable Systems Integration Model (SSIM™) 16

  17. The SSIM™ Approach: Scenario Results: Measuring Costs and ROI Project Cost Burden by Detailed Life-Cycle Strategy Costs Project Funding Source Strategy Project Prioritization Phasing Sustainable Systems Integration Model (SSIM™) 17

  18. The SSIM™ Approach: Compare Scenarios : Explore the Range of Possibilities The Optimal Solution is what is Politically & Financially Acceptable Sustainable Systems Integration Model (SSIM™) 18

Recommend


More recommend