bri
play

(BRI) AND I NTERNATIONAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION Diego Meja-Lemos - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Apr 04, 2023 •661 likes •719 views

T HE B ELT AND R OAD I NITIATIVE (BRI) AND I NTERNATIONAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION Diego Meja-Lemos National University of Singapore Faculty of Law Typology of BRI Disputes US$900bn in projects planned or already underway Commercial Long-term

  1. T HE B ELT AND R OAD I NITIATIVE (BRI) AND I NTERNATIONAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION Diego Mejía-Lemos National University of Singapore Faculty of Law

  2. Typology of BRI Disputes US$900bn in projects planned or already underway Commercial Long-term multi-contract, multi- HKIAC (in 2015 increase in number and amount of disputes party disputes, construction and between PRC and BRI Participating state parties) infrastructure sectors (corporate, M&A, project Typology literature: [Wang 2017] [Zhao 2018 (RoL)] finance, maritime, trade disputes) Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) 61 BITs exist between China and BRI participating states Investor- State Multilateral Investment Treaties Of the above states, 49 are parties to the Convention on the (MITs) Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (ICSID Convention) Chinese BIT programme (commenced in 1980s; Chinese BITs entered into between the 1980s and the mid-1990s (no umbrella clauses, disputes relating to the compensation amount for expropriation); post-2000s: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Iran, Myanmar, South Africa and Uzbekistan (contain umbrella clauses/ISDS in relation to any dispute relating to the investment) WTO Inter-State Other fora for non-WTO (eg, for certain BRI participating states: Court of the Eurasian Economic Union)

  3. Typology of BRI Dispute Settlement Fora/Methods China’s Supreme People’s Court: China International Commercial International Commercial Courts Litigation Court [Shenzhen CICC (Maritime Road) and Xi’an CICC (Belt)] PRC Opinion 7 re BRI dispute resolution; PRC Guideline to establish a mechanism to resolve BRI trade and investmen disputes ; Singapore’s International Commercial Court and Dubai’s International Financial Centre (DIFC) as ‘models’ Enforcement: Convention of 30 June 2005 on Choice of Court Agreements (Hague Conference on Private International Law; entered into force 1 October 2015; signed by PRC on 12 Sept 2017, not yet ratified) ICC Guidance on Mediation of Belt and Road Disputes. Mediation ADR Singapore International Mediation Centre (SIMC)/China Chamber of International Commerce Mediation Centre (CCOIC) MoU Institutional (ICC, LCIA, HKIAC, SIAC, etc) Global Institutions Ad Hoc (UNCITRAL Rules, administered by, eg, PCA) International China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC) Shenzhen Court of International Arbitration (SCIA) BRI-specific: Silk Road Arbitration Centre in Xi’an Arbitration Chinese Institutions Wuhan Arbitration Centre Belt & Road Arbitration Court Enforcement: 1958 New York Convention (only BRI participating states not parties: Ethiopia, Iraq, Maldives, Timor-Leste, Turkmenistan, Yemen); ICSID Convention

  4. Selected References ‘The Belt and Road Initiative in quest for a dispute resolution mechanism’ 25(1) Asia Pacific Law Review (2017) Wang 2017 ‘Dimensions of the New Belt & Road International Order: An Analysis of the Emerging Legal Norms and a Conceptionalisation of the Regulation of Dahlan 2018 Disputes’ 9 Beijing Law Review 87 (2018) ‘Development of International Dispute Resolution under the Belt and Road Initiative’ in Zhao, Development of International Dispute Resolution Zhao 2018 under the Belt and Road Initiative (CUP, 2018)

Recommend

More recommend