automated mri based pipeline for glioma segmentation and
play

Automated MRI Based Pipeline for Glioma Segmentation and Prediction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS MEDICAL IMAGE AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (MEDISIP) Automated MRI Based Pipeline for Glioma Segmentation and Prediction of Grade, IDH Mutation and 1p19q Co-deletion Milan Decuyper 1 , Stijn Bonte 1 ,


  1. DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS MEDICAL IMAGE AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (MEDISIP) Automated MRI Based Pipeline for Glioma Segmentation and Prediction of Grade, IDH Mutation and 1p19q Co-deletion Milan Decuyper 1 , Stijn Bonte 1 , Karel Deblaere 1,2 and Roel Van Holen 1 1 Medical Image and Signal Processing (MEDISIP), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium 2 Department of Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium

  2. Motivation WHO classification of glioma 1 : Histology Oligodendroglioma Astrocytoma Oligoastrocytoma Glioblastoma T1 T1ce IDH status IDH mutant IDH wild-type IDH mutant IDH wild-type 1p19q and other Glioblastoma, IDH mutant ATRX loss* genetic 1p/19q codeletion TP53 mutation* Glioblastoma, IDH wild-type parameters Genetic testing not done or inconclusive Diffuse astrocytoma, IDH mutant After exclusion of other entities: Diffuse astrocytoma, NOS Oligodendroglioma, Diffuse astrocytoma, IDH wild-type Oligodendroglioma, NOS * = characteristic but not Oligodendroglioma, NOS Oligoastrocytoma, NOS IDH mutant and 1p/19q codeleted required for diagnosis Glioblastoma, NOS • WHO Grade, IDH mutation and 1p19q co-deletion are important markers for optimal therapy planning and prognosis • Biopsies involve risks and negatively impact overall survival Need for non-invasive, accurate and automatic CAD systems T2 FLAIR 1 Louis, D.N., Perry, A., Reifenberger, G. et al., 2016. The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the 2 Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 131, 803–820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1

  3. Segmentation 4x112x112x112 32x112x112x112 64x56x56x56 128x28x28x28 256x14x14x14 512x7x7x7 Encoding: MaxPool 2x2x2 3x3x3 Conv - IN - LReLU 1x1x1 Conv - SoftMax Decoding: Trilinear Upsampling Increased robustness to missing modalities through input channel dropout Data: Available modalities Dice Score Training: BraTS 2019 Training set (335) ET WT TC Test: BraTS 2019 Validation set (125) (online evaluation platform 1 ) T1, T1ce, T2, FLAIR 75.7 89.8 83.2 T1ce, FLAIR 74.4 89.4 82.7 T1ce, T2 74.1 87.0 82.2 3 1 https://ipp.cbica.upenn.edu

  4. Multi-task Glioma Classification GBM FC Tumour ROI LGG Adaptive avg. pool Input 3D ROI, 4 ch 3x3x3 conv, 128 /2 3x3x3 conv, 256 /2 3x3x3 conv, 512 /2 7x7x7 conv, 64 /2 3x3x3 conv, 64 3x3x3 conv, 128 3x3x3 conv, 256 3x3x3 conv, 512 3x3x3 conv, 64 IDHmut FC IDHwild 1p19qDel FC 1p19qIntact Training Validation Test Public Data: Multi-task learning: Glioblastoma 264 27 46 • TCIA: TCGA-GBM | TCGA-LGG | 1p19qDeletion + Reduce overfitting Lower-grade 194 43 54 BraTS 2019 (not already included in TCGA) + Handle missing labels IDH mutant 123 41 48 • 628 patients Train one network on all data IDH wildtype 87 29 52 • At least preoperative T1ce + T2 and/or FLAIR 1p19q co-deleted 83 20 30 1p19q Intact 100 23 24 Total 458 70 100 4

  5. Results Independent Test Data Ghent University Hospital (GUH): • 61 GBM + 49 LGG • 32 IDH mutant + 54 IDH wildtype • 12 1p19q co-deleted + 28 1p19q Intact TCIA Test set AUC Acc. Sens. Spec. IDH status assessed through immunohistochemistry GBM vs. LGG 93.3 90.0 93.5 87.0 lower sensitivity compared to gene sequencing IDH mutation 94.0 89.0 89.6 88.5 lower specificity of network 1p19q co-deletion 82.1 83.3 86.7 79.2 GUH AUC Acc. Sens. Spec. 3D CNN pipeline GBM vs. LGG 94.0 90.0 90.1 89.8 IDH mutation 86.2 75.6 84.4 70.4 WHO Grade IDH mutation 1p19q co-deletion 86.6 75.0 58.3 82.1 1p19q co-deletion • Non-invasive • Robust to variations in imaging • Accurate protocols and missing modalities • Fully automatic • Based on routine pre-therapy MRI Email: milan.decuyper@ugent.be 5

Recommend


More recommend