assessment of micromechanically induced uncertainties in
play

Assessment of micromechanically-induced uncertainties in the - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

3rd International Electronic Conference on Sensors and Applications Assessment of micromechanically-induced uncertainties in the electromechanical response of MEMS devices Ramin Mirzazadeh , Stefano Mariani Dept. of Civil and Environmental


  1. 3rd International Electronic Conference on Sensors and Applications Assessment of micromechanically-induced uncertainties in the electromechanical response of MEMS devices Ramin Mirzazadeh , Stefano Mariani Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, IT ramin.mirzazadeh@polimi.it, stefano.mariani@polimi.it

  2. Motivation  MicroElectroMechanical Systems (MEMS) miniaturization and reliability  Polysilicon a popular material in MEMS fabrication  Anisotropic crystalline material whose material properties depends on the relative orientation to the crystal lattice  Characteristic length of mechanical components can be www.sandia.gov compared to the size of grains  Morphology & crystal lattice orientation Sources of uncertainties in device static/dynamic response  As the Characteristic length of mechanical components decreases the effects of fabrication inaccuracies emerge Hopcroft,M.A .,et.al.,“What is the Young Modulus of Silicon?”, JMEMS ,2010  Type & amplitude of these fabrication imperfections R. Mirzazadeh 2

  3. Experiments design  Electrostatic actuation/sensing  Microcantilever  4 testing configurations in a simple design Rotational capacitors g 0 = 2 μ m Actuation Designed gap h = 2 μ m Designed beam thickness l = 20 μ m Beam length Lateral capacitor R. Mirzazadeh 3

  4. Experiments design  Electrostatic actuation/sensing  Microcantilever  4 testing configurations in a simple design g 0 = 2 μ m Designed gap h = 2 μ m Designed beam thickness l = 20 μ m Beam length R. Mirzazadeh 4

  5. Experiments  10 specimens are tested  Capacitance changes in order of few fF l = 20 μ m www.ipms.fraunhofer.de Scattering of electromechanical reseponses R. Mirzazadeh 5

  6. Formulating uncertainty sources  Formulating the problem • Young’s modulus, E • Overetch, O Initial rotation, 𝜄 0 • R. Mirzazadeh 6

  7. Analytical modelling • Assumption: negligible electric fringe field , perfect anchor Euler Bernoulli Timoshenko Electrostatic potential Unit electrostatic force Unit capacitance Similar expressions for capacitance changes at two sets of capacitors R. Mirzazadeh 7

  8. Parameter identification Genetic algorithm • • Parameter identification using a genetic algorithm Formulating the problem • Population of 5000 individuals, and 11 generations • Young’s modulus, E • • Two actuation types for cross-validaiton Overetch, O Initial rotation, 𝜄 0 • R. Mirzazadeh 8 8

  9. Parameter identification Genetic algorithm Consistent estimations Inconsistent estimations capacitance change (fF) capacitance change (fF) 4 0.5 3 Introducing three 0 2 uncertain parameters into -0.5 the model enhaced the 1 parameter estimation 0 -1 0 10 20 30 40 0 5 10 15 V R (V) V L (V) process with respect to the capacitance change (fF) 0 capacitance change (fF) 2.5 previous work* 2 -2 1.5 1 -4 Numerical Simulated 0.5 Experimental Experimental *Mirzazadeh R., Ghisi A., Mariani S., “Assessment of -6 0 polysilicon film properties through on- chip tests”, Proceedings 0 10 20 30 40 0 5 10 15 V L (V) V R (V) of Sensors and Applications, November 2015. R. Mirzazadeh 9

  10. Conclusion Concluding remarks: • An on-chip testing device is designed in order to characterize the main features of MEMS fabricated by polycrystalline materials with cross-validation capability. • Experimental evidence on the scattering of micro beams electromechanical response when their characteristic length shrinks. • Analytical coupled-field models are provided for electrostatic MEMS. Appropriate models can be developed for other MEMS devices similar to what has been proposed in this work. • Material and geometrical parameters of the devices have been characterized through genetic algorithm. Possible future developments • Adopting numerical models such as FEM for more sophisticated modelling of the device. • Employing probabilistic tools (such as Bayesian inference based methods) for parameter identification to allow for measurement errors References:  Mirzazadeh, R., Eftekhar Azam, S., Mariani, S.: Micromechanical Characterization of Polysilicon Films through On-Chip Tests. Sensors, 16, 1191, 2016.  Mirzazadeh R., Ghisi A., Mariani S., “Assessment of polysilicon film properties through on - chip tests”, Proceedings of Sensors and Applications, November 2015.  Younis M.: MEMS Linear and Nonlinear Statics and Dynamics. Springer Science+Business Media, 2011.  Hopcroft M. A., Nix W. D., Kenny T. W.: What is the Young’s Modulus of Silicon? J Microelectromech Syst 19: 229-238 2010. R. Mirzazadeh 10

Recommend


More recommend