appropriate use and interpretation of cardiac biomarkers
play

Appropriate Use and Interpretation of Cardiac Biomarkers Dr. Vikas - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Canadian Society of Internal Medicine Annual Meeting 2017 Toronto, ON Appropriate Use and Interpretation of Cardiac Biomarkers Dr. Vikas Tandon Associate Professor, Cardiology McMaster University November 1, 2017 CSIM Annual Meeting 2017


  1. Canadian Society of Internal Medicine Annual Meeting 2017 Toronto, ON Appropriate Use and Interpretation of Cardiac Biomarkers Dr. Vikas Tandon Associate Professor, Cardiology McMaster University November 1, 2017

  2. CSIM Annual Meeting 2017 Conflict Disclosures I have the following conflicts to declare: Company/Organization Details Advisory Board or equivalent X X Speakers bureau member X X Payment from a commercial organization. X X (including gifts or other consideration or ‘in kind’ compensation) Grant(s) or an honorarium X X Patent for a product referred to or X X marketed by a commercial organization. Investments in a pharmaceutical X X organization, medical devices company or communications firm. Participating or participated in a clinical Participated in periop research studies McMaster University trial including VISION, POISE-2, MANAGE

  3. CSIM Annual Meeting 2017 The following presentation represents the views of the speaker at the time of the presentation. This information is meant for educational purposes, and should not replace other sources of information or your medical judgment. Learning Objectives: • Develop an approach to managing patients elevated troponins who present with non - coronary presentations • Develop short - and long - term management plans for patients with post - operative troponin elevations • Understand the indications for ordering a BNP in acute medical patients and interpret results

  4. Perioperative Care Congress: Science, Evidence and Practice Save the date: Perioperative Care Congress 2018 May 11-13, 2018 Toronto, Ontario CANADA Visit our website http://periopcongress.org/ or follow us on twitter @periopcongress More information to follow!

  5. Scope of problem • Biomarkers are commonly used in medical patients as a means to diagnosis and prognosis • Biomarkers very sensitive but not necessarily specific for any one particular disease process • Interpretation can sometimes be challenging thus requiring an organized approach

  6. Case 1 • 66 F presents with 8/10 RSCP, diaphoresis, palpitations • Baseline ECG shows rapid atrial fibrillation on admission • Cardiac RF – DM, HTN, dyslipidemia, remote smoker • Meds: ASA 81 mg, Rosuvastatin 10 mg, Perindopril 8 mg, Metoprolol 50 mg BID • O/E – HR 120-140 bpm, BP 130/78; otherwise normal • hs-trop I 620 (peak)

  7. 12 Lead

  8. This patient has: 1. Normal coronaries 2. Mild atherosclerotic plaque with no significant stenosis 3. Single vessel disease 4. Multivessel disease

  9. Case 2 • 50 F presents with 2 day history of headaches, chest and back pain lasting hours at a time • Cardiac RF – HTN, current smoker (30 pack year history) • O/E – Hypertensive urgency with BP 200/118 on admission, HR 67; symptoms resolved when normotensive in hospital • hs-trop I 68 (peak)

  10. 12 Lead

  11. This patient has: 1. Normal coronaries 2. Mild atherosclerotic plaque with no significant stenosis 3. Single vessel disease 4. Multivessel disease

  12. Case 3 • 58 F presents with bright red blood per rectum, known history of Ulcerative Colitis • Cardiac RF – HTN, 40 pack year smoking history (recently quit) • No cardiac symptoms. O/E – HR 110-120, BP 130/78 • hs-trop I 108 (peak), Hb 118 (stable)

  13. 12 Lead

  14. This patient has: 1. Normal coronaries 2. Mild atherosclerotic plaque with no significant stenosis 3. Single vessel disease 4. Multivessel disease

  15. The cases thus far: Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 66 F w 8/10 RSCP 50 F headaches, CP and 58 F bright red blood per rapid A Fib 120-140 back pain lasting hours rectum; known UC HTN urgency: BP 200/118 DM, HTN, Chol, remote HTN, current smoker HTN, recent smoker smoker (5 pack yr history) (30 pack year history) (40 pack year history) Peak trops = 620 Peak trops = 68 Peak trops = 108

  16. The cases thus far: Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 66 F w 8/10 RSCP 50 F headaches, CP and 58 F bright red blood per rapid A Fib 120-140 back pain lasting hours rectum; known UC HTN urgency: BP 200/118 DM, HTN, Chol, remote HTN, current smoker HTN, recent smoker smoker (5 pack yr history) (30 pack year history) (40 pack year history) Peak trops = 620 Peak trops = 68 Peak trops = 108 Cath: Mild plaque Cath: 90% stenosis ostial Cardiac CT: Normal No significant stenosis RCA; mild dz LAD/LCX coronaries

  17. Concept • The size of the troponin elevation does not correlate with extent of coronary disease But • The rise of the troponin does indicate poorer outcome in patients compared to normal troponin counterparts

  18. Ostermann et al. Critical Care 2014

  19. Lim et al, Arch Intern Med 2006

  20. Other Medical Conditions Condition Hazard Ratio Critical Illness OR 2.5 for all cause mortality Chronic Kidney Disease Trop T adjusted HR = 3 Trop I adjusted HR = 2.7 Pulmonary Embolism OR 4.8 for all cause mortality

  21. The Importance of Myocardial Injury Devereaux, JAMA, 2012

  22. Approach • Look for and correct physiological abnormalities – hypoxia, hypotension, tachycardia (if BP adequate), Hb if <70, sepsis, PE • If no signs of bleeding initiate ASA 81 mg daily • Initiate or intensify Statin therapy • Inpatient vs. outpatient risk stratification and follow up

  23. CASE 4: Postoperative troponin monitoring • 64 y/o male • Postop day 3 orthopedic surgery • No symptoms, trop 0.15 (0.04 ULN) • EKG: Anterior biphasic T waves • Cath/OCT - 3 days after trop increase

  24. This patient has: 1. Normal coronaries 2. Mild atherosclerotic plaque with no significant stenosis 3. Single vessel disease with plaque rupture/thrombus 4. Single vessel disease but no thrombus/stable plaque

  25. CASE 5: Perioperative Myocardial Infarction • 83 y/o male • Postop day 5 orthopedic surgery • Sudden chest pain trop 9.85 (0.04 ULN), • EKG: No acute changes • Cath/OCT - 2 days after trop increase

  26. This patient has: 1. Normal coronaries 2. Mild atherosclerotic plaque with no significant stenosis 3. Single vessel disease with plaque rupture/thrombus 4. Single vessel disease but no thrombus/stable plaque

  27. Summary of Cases 4 and 5 Case 4 Case 5 64 year old male 83 year old male POD 3 orthopedic surgery POD 5 orthopedic surgery No symptoms, trop 0.15 (ULN 0.04) Sudden chest pain, trops 9.85 (ULN 0.04) Biphasic T waves anterior leads No acute ECG changes

  28. Case 4 Cath Findings

  29. Case 4 OCT findings

  30. PCI with BMS, Dual antiplatelet therapy with ASA and Plavix for 1 year Uncomplicated course at 1 year

  31. CASE 5: Perioperative Myocardial Infarction • 83 y/o male • Postop day 5 orthopedic surgery • Sudden chest pain trop 9.85 (0.04 ULN), • EKG: No acute changes • Cath/OCT - 2 days after trop increase

  32. Case 5 Cath Findings Moderate LAD stenosis Distal LCX stenosis >80% in small vessel Normal LV function

  33. Case 5 OCT findings

  34. PCI with BMS 3.5 mm Dual antiplatelet therapy x 12 months Uncomplicated course at 30 days

  35. Summary of Cases 4 and 5 Case 4 Case 5 64 year old male 83 year old male POD 3 orthopedic surgery POD 5 orthopedic surgery No symptoms, trop 0.15 (ULN 0.04) Sudden chest pain, trops 9.85 (ULN 0.04) Biphasic T waves anterior leads No acute ECG changes

  36. Summary of Cases 4 and 5 Case 4 Case 5 64 year old male 83 year old male POD 3 orthopedic surgery POD 5 orthopedic surgery No symptoms, trop 0.15 (ULN 0.04) Sudden chest pain, trops 9.85 (ULN 0.04) Biphasic T waves anterior leads No acute ECG changes Plaque rupture and thrombus - LAD Significant stenosis RCA but no plaque rupture

  37. Concept • The size of the troponin elevation does not correlate pathophysiology – i.e. cannot distinguish between plaque rupture vs. supply demand • Presence or absence of symptoms not helpful in determining pathophysiology – Further, no significant difference in mortality outcomes

  38. MINS that probably will go undetected without trop monitoring • MINS without chest discomfort, other possible symptoms (i.e., arm, neck, or jaw discomfort, shortness of breath), or pulmonary edema • 84.2%

  39. MINS – High Sensitivity Assay • Among 3904 patients who had MINS • 93.1% did not experience an ischemic symptom • 21.7% fulfilled universal definition of MI – elevated hsTnT with ≥1 ischemic feature • Thus, troponin screening is the most effective way to screen for cardiac complications

  40. Approach to MINS • Look for and correct physiological abnormalities – hypoxia, hypotension, tachycardia (if BP adequate), Hb if <70 • If no signs of bleeding initiate ASA 81 mg daily • Initiate or intensify Statin therapy

  41. BNP/nt-pro BNP • Usage in diagnosis of CHF vs. Resp cause • Usage in prognosis of CHF and acute decomp • Usage in periop risk stratification

  42. Case 6 • 67 M seen in preop for bariatric surgery • Cardiac RF: DM, HTN, remote smoker • Other PMHX: prev colon ca, OSA, GERD, migraines • Meds: Rosuvastatin, Ramipril, Metformin, Empagliflozin • “Asymptomatic” but nt-pro BNP = 219

  43. Nuclear Perfusion Study No Persantine ECG changes

  44. Nuclear Perfusion Study

  45. Nuclear Perfusion – PET/CT

  46. Cath

Recommend


More recommend