A Colorado Call for Innovation: An Overview Office of State Planning and Budgeting (OSPB), January 2017 “The Colorado Call for Innovation is an ambitious statewide effort to catalyze collaboration to move the needle on measurable outcomes for children and their families.” - Gov. John Hickenlooper 1
What is Pay for Success? What is this Pay for Success project? What is your Focus? What is the Call for Innovation? Questions? 2
Standard Government Financing of Services Service Target Provides Funds Provides Services Government Provider Population Outcomes? Impact? Performance Incentives? Possibly. 3
Overview of Pay For Success Model Government (county, state, school district, etc.) repays Provides working Funders funders, per contract, based capital upfront, (Investor/ on outcomes achieved funding services Foundations) Government Service End Payer – pays back Providers Funders based (Nonprofits) on outcomes Independent evaluator A contract Evidence-informed assesses impact of outlines key prevention or services on key outcomes for intervention for outcomes which Target underserved group Evaluator Population government (Assesses Impact, (Receives will pay Outcomes) Services) 4
Example: Denver Project, Launched Last Year Denver Foundation Piton Foundation Denver will make Success Walton Family Foundation Laura and John Arnold Foundation payments over next 5 years 8 Funders: Living Cities Blended Catalyst Fund LLC based on those 2 key outcomes $8.7 Million Nonprofit Finance Fund Colorado Health Foundation Northern Trust Company Service Providers: Government Colorado City and Coalition for Other Parties: Homeless, County of Corporation for Mental Health Denver Supportive Center for Denver Housing, Social Impact Solutions, Evaluation looks at 2 Etc. Supportive Housing and key outcomes: Wrap-Around Case Individuals who stay in Management housing, and reduction Target in Jail Bed Days Population: Evaluator 250 Persistently Urban Homeless Institute Denver Residents 5
Pay For Success Activity Across the U.S. 6
Illustration of How Pay for Success Could Work in Colorado for this Project Providers State Child of Services Government Welfare (Evidence- (CDHS/OSPB/ Involved Other state based & Youth entity?) Promising) Improved Local Juvenile Alignments of Government Justice Service County/Judicial Involved (Continuum of District/School Youth District, etc. care) 7 Possible PFS Finance Rigorous Evaluation
What is Pay for Success? What is this Pay for Success project? What is your Focus? What is the Call for Innovation? Questions? 8
Target Populations and Outcomes Target Population 2: Target Population 1: Colorado Youth in Colorado Child Secure Detention, Welfare-involved, Following Secure Out of Home Placed Detention Youth, Grades 7-12 4,012 Youth 3758 Youth Statewide Statewide (Last Fiscal Year) (On Average) Outcomes: Outcomes: On Time High School Graduation Decrease Future Detention/Commitment Juvenile Justice Involvement Decrease Arrests/Justice System Involvement Post-Secondary Education/Employment Improve Educational Outcomes Placement Stability/Permanency Intermediate Behavioral Measures Intermediate Education/Behavioral Measures 9
Good Work Already Happening Across Colorado to Serve System-Involved Youth County and Judicial District Innovation Collaborative SB-94 Services Management Program (Alternatives to (CMP)/1451 Groups Detention) (42 Counties) Services offered through Crossover Youth Schools Practice Model (in System of Care/Wrap use in CO) Around Pilot Title IV-E Waiver Evidence-Based Programs Services Offered to (Emphasizing Preventative Youth on Probation Child Welfare Approaches) 10
Target Population 1: Out-of-Home Placed, Child Welfare Involved High/Middle School Students Based on CDE-CDHS Data, Colorado Foster Youth Have Very Low Graduation Rates Source: UNC Reports and Data Analysis (2016)
School Changes for Out of Home Placed Child Welfare Youth Grades 7 to 12 12 Source: UNC Report (2016), Based on CDE-CDHS Data Sharing
Additional School Changes For Foster Youth Drop Graduation Rates Dramatically 13 Source: UNC Report (2016), Based on CDE-CDHS Data Sharing
Based on Limited Colorado Data, We See High Overlap with DYC/Justice System 28% of detention center placements 2007-2012 were students who had also experienced a previous out-of-home placement (UNC Report, 2014 and DYC Analysis). Two-thirds (63% to 67%) of DYC commitments were previously involved in an out-of-home placement (Based on DYC analysis from 2007 to 2013). 43% of males with child welfare and public mental health involvement become DYC-involved. Source: UNC Report (2014), DYC Data Analysis, and CDHS COACT Colorado Report (2014) 14
Target Population 2: Youth in Secure (Short- Term) Detention, Post-Release (Note: This is NOT Commitment) Source: DYC Data Source: DYC Data 7,024 Secure Detention Admissions (FY 14-15) 4,012 Unique Youth in Secure Detention (FY 14-15) Source: SB-94 Evaluation (FY 14-15). Source: DYC Data
Colorado Youth In Secure Detention: Reentry Rates? All Youth in Secure Detention, Single Year Percentage Who Return, In Single Fiscal Year FY 2014-2014, Colorado Youth Statewide Return 41% Don’t Average Return Trips: 2.85 59% Source: SB-94 Evaluation (FY 14-15).
Colorado Youth In Secure Detention: Reentry Rates back to Detention? Youth Ages 15-16 in Secure Detention Youth Ages 10-14 in Secure Detention Percent Who Return, FY ‘10/’11 & ‘11/12 to Percent Who Return, FY 2010-2011 & 2011- Present (3920 youth total) 2012 to Present (1910 youth total) Colorado Youth Statewide Colorado Youth Statewide Don’t Don’t Return Return 31% 40% Return Return 69% 60% Source: Division of Youth Corrections Analysis, 2017. Please note this is preliminary analysis by DYC. Further research and confirmation of this numbers is needed. These figures may also include some youth who are 17 transferred between facilities during a single episode of detention.
Colorado Youth In Secure Detention: Rates of Entry to Commitment? Youth Ages 10-14 in Secure Detention Youth Ages 15-16 in Secure Detention Youth in Secure Detention FY 2010-2011 & Youth in Secure Detention FY 2010-2011 & 2011-2012, Later Committed Prior to Aging 2011-2012, Later Committed Prior to Aging Out of Juvenile Justice System, to Present Out of Juvenile Justice System, to Present Later in Later in Commitment Commitment 22.4% Not 30.4% Committed 77.6% Not Committed 69.6% Source: Division of Youth Corrections Analysis, 2017. 18
Colorado Youth In Secure Detention: Total Reentry? (Detention OR Commitment) Youth Ages 10-14 in Secure Detention Youth Ages 15-16 in Secure Detention Youth in Secure Detention FY 2010-2011 & Youth in Secure Detention FY 2010-2011 & 2011-2012, Later either return to Secure 2011-2012, Later either return to Secure Detention OR Committed, to Present Detention OR Committed, to Present Don’t Reenter Don’t Reenter 30.1% Reenter 63.8% 36.2% Reenter 69.9% Source: Division of Youth Corrections Analysis, 2017. Please note this is preliminary analysis by DYC. Further confirmation of these numbers is needed. These figures may also include some youth who are transferred 19 between facilities during a single episode of detention.
Number of Return Trips to Secure Detention, of All Youth Who Returned Of 4,419 all Colorado Youth of any age, who return to Detention or are Committed, of Original FY 2010-2011 and 2011-2012 Cohorts (total of 57.1% of original cohort) 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Source: Division of Youth Corrections Analysis, 2017. Please note this is preliminary analysis by DYC. Further confirmation of these numbers is needed. These figures may also include some youth who are transferred 20 between facilities during a single episode of detention.
Youth Returning to Secure Detention Often Account for High Number of Trips Youth All Ages Who Return to Secure Youth All Ages Who Return to Secure Detention After Release Detention After Release By Number of Youth, of 4419 who Returned By Total Trips through Secure Detention Return more Number of Number of than 3 times: Trips through Trips for 1260 Youth System of those 28.5% those who Returning 3 Return 3+ or less times Return 1, 2 or 3 Times: 5368 Times: 7837 40.7% 3159 Youth 59.3% 71.5% Source: Division of Youth Corrections Analysis, 2017. Please note this is preliminary analysis by DYC. Further confirmation of these numbers is needed. These figures may also include some youth who are transferred 21 between facilities during a single episode of detention.
What is Pay for Success? What is this Pay for Success project? What is your Focus? What is the Call for Innovation? Questions? 22
Recommend
More recommend
