an ifu survey of redshift one galaxies
play

An IFU survey of redshift one galaxies Chris Lidman H Gas - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

An IFU survey of redshift one galaxies Chris Lidman H Gas Velocity Dispersion 72 50 0.3 50 Gas Velocity 32 50 64 0.0 24 40 40 0.3 40 56 16 0.6 8 30 30 30 48 0.9 0 40 20 20 1.2 20 8 1.5 32


  1. An IFU survey of redshift one galaxies Chris Lidman H α Gas Velocity Dispersion 72 50 0.3 50 Gas Velocity 32 50 64 0.0 24 40 40 − 0.3 40 56 16 − 0.6 8 30 30 30 48 − 0.9 0 40 20 20 − 1.2 20 − 8 − 1.5 32 − 16 10 10 10 − 1.8 − 24 24 0 − 2.1 − 32 − 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 0 0 16 0 10 20 30 40 0 10 20 30 40 Courtesy of D. Campbell-Wilson With help from Julia Bryant and Scott Croom ULTIMATE-Subaru Collaboration Meeting

  2. Fibre Integral Field Units OzDES SAMI MaNGA 32” 15” Single fibre ULTIMATE-Subaru Collaboration Meeting

  3. Local galaxy IFU surveys The SAMI survey - http://sami-survey.org/ › 3,400 galaxies › Median redshift z~0.05 › Started in March 2013, ends 2018 The MaNGA survey - http://www.sdss.org/surveys/manga/ › 10,000 galaxies › Median redshift z~0.03 › Started in March 2014, ends 2020 The HECTOR survey › 10,000+ galaxies › Starting in 2019 › Larger IFUs ULTIMATE-Subaru Collaboration Meeting

  4. The SAMI survey OzDES H α Gas Velocity Dispersion 60 50 50 0.9 240 Gas Velocity 50 45 220 0.6 40 40 30 40 200 0.3 15 180 30 30 30 0.0 0 160 − 0.3 20 20 20 − 15 140 − 0.6 10 120 − 30 10 10 − 0.9 100 − 45 0 − 1.2 0 − 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 0 80 − 60 0 10 20 30 40 0 10 20 30 40 -1.2 -0.8 -0.4 0.0 0.4 Log([NII]/H α ) SFR Mass ULTIMATE-Subaru Collaboration Meeting

  5. Science results from SAMI and MaNGA OzDES 146 papers with SAMI or MaNGA in the title Enormous diversity in the science • Environmental quenching occurs outside-in (Schaefer++2017) • Mass quenching occurs inside-out (Ellison++2018) • Star formation is not enough to explain gas turbulence in disk galaxies (Zhou++2017) • The “Kinematic” morphology - density relation (Green et al. 2018, Brough++2017) • The ubiquity of low-ionisation emission line regions (Belfiore++2016) • The ubiquity of galactic scale outflows - 40% of edge on galaxies (Ho++2016) • Tight local mass density - metallicity relationship (Barrera-Ballesteros++2016) ULTIMATE-Subaru Collaboration Meeting

  6. The Universe at z=1 OzDES SAMI ULTIMATE M-IFS • It is 7.8 billion years younger (middle age) • It is 8 times denser • The SFR density is 10 times higher, i.e. more SNe • The AGN number density is ~100 times higher • Galaxy clusters are a factor of 3 less massive • Higher gas fractions How do the processes that shape galaxies at z=1 differ in importance from the ones we see today? For example, one might expect galaxy scale winds to be far more common ULTIMATE-Subaru Collaboration Meeting

  7. OzDES ULTIMATE Multi-object IFU Galaxy Survey A SAMI-like at three (four) redshift intervals: z~0.6, 0.9, and1.4 (2.2) • 3000 galaxies • Targets from the COSMOS and SXDF-UDS fields (HSC ultra-deep survey and forerunner ULTIMATE imaging surveys) › What are the physical processes responsible for galaxy transformations? - Morphological and kinematic transformations; internal vs. external; secular vs. fast; ram pressure stripping; harassment, strangulation; galaxy–group/cluster tides; galaxy-galaxy mergers; galaxy-galaxy interactions… › How does mass and angular momentum build up? - The galaxy velocity function; stellar mass in dynamically hot and cold systems; galaxy merger rates… › Feeding and feedback: how does gas get into galaxies, and how does it leave? - Winds and outflows; feedback vs. mass; triggering and suppression of SF; gas inflow; metallicity gradients; the role of AGN… ULTIMATE-Subaru Collaboration Meeting

  8. ULTIMATE IFUs OzDES 1.35” Area= 61 1.5 d 2 / 3 = 1.18 sq. arc seconds 1 7 19 37 61 d Area=1.5dt t d=0.15” pitch or flat-to-flat ULTIMATE-Subaru Collaboration Meeting

  9. OzDES SAMI, MaNGA and ULTIMATE IFU Characteristic SAMI @ z~0.05 MaNGA @ z~0.03 ULTIMATE @ z~1 Number of IFUs 13 17 13 FoV of positioner 3.6 Mpc (60’) diameter 3.2 Mpc (90’) diameter 7.2 Mpc (15’) diameter 7.2-19.3 kpc FoV of IFU 15 kpc (15”) 11.0 kpc (1.35”) (12”-32”) Number of fibres per 61 19-127 61 IFU Fibre pitch 1.6 kpc (1.6”) 1.2 kpc (2”) 1.2 kpc (0.15”) Minimum sep. 30kpc (30”) 160 kpc (20”) Spectral resolution 1,700-4500 2,000 3,000-5,000 Telescope 3.9m 2.5m 8.2m ULTIMATE-Subaru Collaboration Meeting

  10. SINFONI, KMOS and ULTIMATE IFU OzDES Characteristic SINFONI @ z~1 KMOS @ z~1 ULTIMATE @ z~1 Number of IFUs 1 24 13 3.5 Mpc (7.2’) FoV of positioner - 7.2 Mpc (15’) diameter diameter FoV of IFU 24.4 kpc (3”) 22.7 kpc (2.8”) 11.0 kpc (1.35”) Number of fibres per 1024* 196* 61 IFU Fibre pitch 0.8 kpc (0.1”) 1.6 kpc (0.2”) 1.2 kpc (0.15”) Minimum sep. - 49 kpc (6”) 160 kpc (20”) Spectral resolution 2000-4000 2,000-4,200 3,000-5,000 Telescope 8.2m 8.2m 8.2m Wavelength 1.1-2.4 mic 0.8-2.5 mic 0.8-1.8 mic ULTIMATE-Subaru Collaboration Meeting

  11. What are we learning from surveys done with SINFONI and KMOS • SINS, SHiZELS, MASSIV, AMAZE/LSD (one object at a time and prior to KMOS) • KMOS surveys (24 objects at a time, long integrations) IFU FoV and spatial resolution: Ideally, a 2” FoV with 0.1” resolution Spectral resolution: Ideally R=4500 / (1+z) Observations (especially at high-z) are photon starved, integrations are long, and most papers focus on the properties of the gas. Wisnioski++ Sample size: At high z, samples are ~500 (Cf. At low z, samples are ~10,000) Sample sizes at high redshift are trimmed by factors of 2-4 after selection cuts are made. Specially resolved studies of the stellar continuum at z~1 will require TMT, MNT or ELT. ULTIMATE-Subaru Collaboration Meeting

  12. OzDES The original concept 1.35” Area= 61 1.5 d 2 / 3 = 1.18 sq. arc seconds 1 7 19 37 61 d Area=1.5dt t d=0.15” pitch or flat-to-flat Not optimal for galaxies or points sources ULTIMATE-Subaru Collaboration Meeting

  13. OzDES A revised concept 2.1” Area= 169 1.5 d 2 / 3 = 0.45” 3.3 sq. arc seconds Points sources (stars, high-z galaxies) d Area=1.5dt d=0.15” t pitch or flat-to-flat ULTIMATE-Subaru Collaboration Meeting

  14. OzDES Technical challenges The increase in the number of fibres from 61 to 169 means three times fewer IFUs with the same detector. To recover the multiplex one needs larger detector and multiple spectrographs => $$$ Two sets of IFUs means that a slit exchanger is required => $$$ d ULTIMATE-Subaru Collaboration Meeting

  15. What will the landscape look like in 10 years? OzDES GMTIFS @ z~1 Characteristic ULTIMATE @ z~1 (see also HARMONI) Number of IFUs 4-5 (2k detectors) 1 FoV of positioner 7.2 Mpc (15’) diameter NA FoV of IFU 17.0 kpc (2.1”) 36x18 kpc (4.4”x2.3”) Number of fibres per IFU 169 1980 Fibre pitch 1.2 kpc (0.15”) 0.05-0.4 kpc (6-50 mas) Minimum sep. 160 kpc (20”) NA Spectral resolution 3,000-5,000 5,000-10,000 Telescope 8.2m 25m Wavelength 0.8-1.8 mic 0.9-2.5 mic Also GIRMOS on Gemini and IRIS/NFIRAOS on TMT ULTIMATE-Subaru Collaboration Meeting

  16. OzDES Issues that need more work I. What is the optional fibre spacing on the detector? (assumed 5 pixels) II. Can we install a slit exchanger? III. Using fibres that transmit in the K band VI. Is an ADC needed for the small IFU? VII. Further development of the science cases IV. Detailed feasibility calculations ULTIMATE-Subaru Collaboration Meeting

  17. OzDES Thank You ULTIMATE-Subaru Collaboration Meeting

Recommend


More recommend