Accreditation Public Forum November 4, 2016 Today ’s forum: 1. Describing current MVC accreditation processes underway, description of the Midterm Report and the Follow-Up report; 2. Soliciting feedback on Report drafts from October 24 in preparation for the Final draft, coming November 10, 3. Answering your questions MVC ’ s Accreditation web page http://www.mvc.edu/accreditation/ At bottom of this accreditation website are the two documents we will discuss: Midterm Report DRAFT from October 24, 2016 http://www.mvc.edu/files/MVC-Mid-Term-Report-24102016.pdf NOTE: The Follow-Up report is simply the Midterm Report ’s response to College Recommendation 4 and the timeline. Follow-Up Report DRAFT from October 24, 2016 http://www.mvc.edu/files/MVC-Follow-Up-Report-24102016.pdf Remember, your feedback on these reports is welcome and encouraged . Please send comments to David Vakil, Dean of Instruction, at david.vakil@mvc.edu . Send feedback soon because The Final draft is scheduled to be completed Thursday, November 10.
Soliciting diverse accreditation feedback College committees mentioned explicitly or implicitly in accreditation reports SPC and SPC subcommittees Equity and Success (new Student Services Council combined committee) Faculty Development Diversity Committee Faculty Association Academic Senate Report Assessment Standard III Standard IV Curriculum Standard II Standard I segment ASMVC Equity starts on HRAG PRAG TRAG FRAG CSEA CIPR SSSP APC SPC page … Report Section Follow-Up Timeline 4 X X X List last updated: Follow-Up Coll Rec 4 5 X X X X X 25-Oct-16 Timeline (see Follow-Up Midterm 4 X X X report) Midterm Dist Rec 1 6 X X X X Midterm Dist Rec 2 7 X X X X X Midterm Coll Rec 1 9 X X X X X X Midterm Coll Rec 2 11 X X X X X X X X X X X X X Midterm Coll Rec 3 14 X X X X Coll Rec 4 (same as Midterm 16 X X X X X Follow-Up report) Midterm Coll Rec 5 21 X X X X X X X X Midterm Coll Rec 6 26 X X X X X X Midterm ACCJC data 34 Midterm ACCJC financial data 34 Midterm Institutional Standards 34 Midterm Institutional Goals 34 Midterm AIP 1 35 X X Midterm AIP 2 35 X Midterm AIP 3 35 X X X X X X Actionable Improvement Plans Midterm AIP 4 36 X X X X (self-identified by college) Midterm AIP 5 36 X X X X X Midterm AIP 6 36 X X X X X X X X Midterm AIP 7 37 X X X X X Midterm AIP 8 37 X X X Midterm AIP 9 37 X X X Midterm AIP 10 37 X X Midterm AIP 11 37 X X X X Midterm AIP 12 38 X X X X X X Midterm AIP 13 38 X X X Midterm AIP 14 38 X X X Midterm AIP 15 39 X X X X
Midterm Report Summary Excerpts Excerpts from the draft Midterm report published on accreditation website October 24, 2016 NOTE: College Recommendations 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 were addressed satisfactorily in the October 2015 Follow-Up Report; we note this in the Midterm Report. A Follow-Up report for Recommendation 4 is being submitted with identical language as in the Midterm report as noted below. Two District Recommendations were also previously addressed and appear in the Midterm Report. Coll llege R Recommendatio ion 1 1 (pages 9-10) 10) In order to meet the Standards, the team recommends that the College further articulate its goals and objectives in measurable terms, and assess progress toward achieving its goals systematically and on a regular cycle (Standards I.B.2, I.B.3). Moreno Valley College has sustained its efforts to create goals, objectives, and strategies in measurable terms and continues to assess progress towards achieving goals systematically. The College produced three overarching plans since the Visiting Team’s reco mmendation in 2014: the 2015-2018 Integrated Strategic Plan, the Student Success and Support Programs Plan and the Student Equity Plan. Each of these documents identifies specific goals, strategies to achieve the goals, completion timelines, and responsible parties. The College has also improved its process for measuring achievement of goals by integrating data and objectives into the Instructional Annual Program Review process through the online host TracDat. The College has begun assessing its completion of the goals and strategies in the 2015-2018 Integrated Strategic Plan. The Mission and Institutional Effectiveness (Standard I) subcommittee of the SPC has agreed to develop a systematic process to ensure that ongoing assessment of institutional goals continues systematically. Coll llege R Recommendatio ion 2 2 (pages 1 11-13) In order to meet the Standards, the team recommends that the College assess its planning and program review processes to ensure an ongoing and systematic cycle of evaluation, integrated planning, resource allocation, implementation, and re-evaluation (Standards I.B.6, I.B.7. III.A.6, III.B.2.b, III.B.6, III.B.7, III.C.2, III.D.4). The College has sustained the practices previously outlined in the October 2015 Follow-Up Report related to assessing its planning and program review processes and with integrating and evaluating integrated planning, resource allocation. Details of sustained practices follow. In order to ensure widespread participation in developing resource allocation priorities, Student Services has created a Student Services Council and a Program Review Coordinator to bolster its planning, resource allocation, and program review processes. November 4, 2016 Page 1 of 4
In 2015- 16, the CIPR committee’s revised its charge to review only the Comprehensive Program Reviews and the Program Review processes and to assist with (but not review) the Annual Program Reviews. Based on focus group feedback and on recommendations from the CIPR Committee during regular meetings in 2015-16, the College improved how data are provided in Program Reviews. The College has continued using integrated planning processes and allocating resources, as documented in the college’s Integrated Planning and Resource Allocation (IRPA) document. The College continues to evaluate and improve the IRPA document and associated processes as well as the communications associated with integrated planning and resource allocation. Coll llege R Recommendatio ion 3 3 (pages 1 14-15) In order to meet the Standards, the team reconm1ends that the College regularly assess learning outcomes for all courses and programs and include analysis of learning outcomes results in institutional planning processes (Standard II.A.2.e, II.A.2.f, II.A.2.a, II.A.2.b; II.A.2.e. II.A.2.f.). The College continues to follow through on its assessment plans and actions described in the October 2015 Follow-Up report. As of October 17, 2016, the College has increased the number of courses with ongoing SLO assessment to 94%, or 448 of all 477 active courses. Additionally, of the college’s 2459 SLO statements in all active courses, 2078 (85%) have been assessed as part of an ongoing cycle. The College has also significantly increased the number of courses that have fully assessed all SLOs, as shown in the table below. Report 2015 Annual 2015 Follow- 2016 Annual 2017 Midterm report Up report report report* Courses with some 65% 79% 89% 94% SLOs assessed Courses with all 43% 78% SLOs assessed *Data for 2017 Midterm report based on assessment results reported by October 20, 2016. [T]he college has* completed its mapping between the learning outcomes in the Areas of Emphasis associate degrees and courses comprising those degrees. (*10/26/16 insert “nearly”) Did we complete ADT maps? We reported we would in the 2015 Follow-Up report. November 4, 2016 Page 2 of 4
Recommend
More recommend
