acc expansion
play

ACC EXPANSION CONCEPT DESIGN PREVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ACC EXPANSION CONCEPT DESIGN PREVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020 1 AGENDA COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020 2 AGENDA 1. Introduction 2. Educational Specifications 3. Parking


  1. ACC EXPANSION CONCEPT DESIGN PREVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020 1

  2. AGENDA COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020 2

  3. AGENDA 1. Introduction 2. Educational Specifications 3. Parking and Transportation 4. Building Design 5. Next Steps COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020 3

  4. INTRODUCTION COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020 4

  5. CHECK IT OUT! $$$ https://www.apsva.us/design-and-construction/ HOW MUCH, BY WHEN, arlington-career-center/ FOR WHAT? SCHEDULED MEETINGS ARE SHOWN HERE ROSTER, RESPONSIBILITIES, PARTICIPANTS AND PROCESS (VERY) RELEVANT BACKGROUND RECENT INFORMATION PRESENTATIONS TO SCHOOL BOARD COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020 5 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020

  6. PROJECT OVERVIEW BLPC CHARGE ARLINGTON CAREER CENTER COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020 6

  7. PROJECT BUILDING BLOCKS ACC EXPANSION PROJECT BLPC/PFRC ED SPEC CCWG CIP COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020 7 2

  8. THE JOURNEY WE’VE TAKEN Meeting No. 1: BLPC/PFRC Charge, Urban Design, CIP Meeting No. 2: CCWG, Transportation Study Meeting No. 3: Ed Specs, ACC Programs Meeting No. 4: Design Exercise Meeting No. 5: Bus and Parent Pick Up / Drop Off Meeting No. 6: Parking Meeting No. 7: Auto Tech/Collision, Community Programs, Service Meeting No. 8: Concept Design Review Community Meeting: January 22, 2020 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020 8

  9. EDUCATIONAL SPECIFICATIONS COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020 9

  10. ED SPECS FOR THE ACC EXPANSION 1. Developed through a series of collaborative meetings with representatives from Department of Teaching and Learning, Arlington Career Center and Facilities and Operations 2. Reflect APS and ACC pedagogy 3. Are adaptable to future instructional changes Approved by the School Board on November 7, 2019. Any revisions will be identified concurrent with Concept, Schematic, and Final Design reviews. COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020 10

  11. ACC SPACE PROGRAM AT-A-GLANCE CONNECTED COMMUNITY CHANGE GSF Note: GSF – Gross Square Footage COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020 11

  12. PARKING AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020 12

  13. TRANSPORTATION: GOALS 1. Provide and promote multi-modal options to help reduce the amount of driving to the Career Center 2. Create a safe campus for all modes of travel 3. Minimize traffic impact generated by the Career Center 4. Minimize parking costs of project 5. Minimize on-street parking conflicts 6. Provide efficient and convenient transportation options for APS families and staff 7. Minimize space dedicated to transportation on Career Center campus COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020 13

  14. BLPC CHARGE: PARKING OPTIONS Develop options and estimated costs for various options for on-site parking during the Concept Design phase, including: 1. No structured parking and accessible parking spaces only provided on site 2. A one-level 225 to 250-space, below-grade parking structure 3. A two-level 450 to 500-space, below-grade parking structure 4. Other parking solutions that may emerge during Concept Design COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020 14

  15. PROCESS FOR DETERMINING PARKING 1. Calculate estimated peak demand considering all site uses 2. Determine reasonable expected reduction using Transportation Demand Management (TDM) division-wide goals (APS GO! and Vision Zero) 3. Assign parking supply to match peak demand; parking supply could utilize on-site, off-site, and on-street strategies 4. County Board approves required parking as part of the Use Permit COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020 15

  16. PARKING DEMAND Demand Range (2PM Peak) HS Staff: 210-247 spaces ES Staff: 72-79 spaces Students: 85-135 spaces Library/Visitor: 35 spaces Total: 402-496 spaces *Low relies heavily on Transportation Demand Management (TDM) HS – High School ES – Elementary School COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020 16 16

  17. PARKING DEMAND Recommended Demand Range Demand (2PM Peak) (2PM Peak) HS Staff: 210-247 spaces HS Staff: 210 spaces ES Staff: 72-79 spaces ES Staff: 72 spaces Students: 85-135 spaces Students: 103 spaces Library/Visitor: 35 spaces Library/Visitor: 35 spaces Total: 402-496 spaces Total: 420 spaces *Low relies heavily on Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Applied Mode Splits HS – High School HS Staff: 75% (APS Go! 2021 Target, reduction from 85%) ES – Elementary School ES Staff: 75% (APS Go! 2021 Target, reduction from 79%) Students: 12% (25% reduction in driving students) COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020 17 17

  18. PARKING DEMAND & SUPPLY Recommended Supply Demand On-Site Off-Site On-Street (2PM Peak) Lease Options: (up to 200 spaces if HS Staff: 210 spaces available) Adjacent: ES Staff: 72 spaces Below-grade 77 spaces Students: 103 spaces ECDC garage for Above-grade temporary use only Nearby Unrestricted: Library/Visitor: 35 spaces (up to 100 spaces Up to 144 spaces Total: 420 spaces Surface under present agreement) BALANCE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020 18 18

  19. PARKING DEMAND & SUPPLY Recommended Supply Demand On-Site Off-Site On-Street (2PM Peak) Lease (up to 200 spaces if Options: HS Staff: 210 spaces available) Adjacent: ES Staff: 72 spaces Below-grade 77 spaces Students: 103 spaces ECDC garage for Above-grade Nearby Unrestricted: temporary use only Library/Visitor: 35 spaces Up to 144 spaces (up to 100 spaces Total: 420 spaces Surface under present agreement) Provides greatest flexibility and predictability for parking management; Requires capital investment, permanence reduces options for alternative site development COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020 19 19

  20. PARKING DEMAND & SUPPLY Recommended Supply Demand On-Site Off-Site On-Street (2PM Peak) Lease (up to 200 spaces if Options: HS Staff: 210 spaces available) Adjacent: ES Staff: 72 spaces Below-grade 77 spaces Students: 103 spaces ECDC garage for Above-grade Nearby Unrestricted: temporary use only Library/Visitor: 35 spaces Up to 144 spaces (up to 100 spaces Total: 420 spaces Surface under present agreement) Limited flexibility and dependent on availability and market conditions; Distance from ACC may make use of leased spaces ineffective COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020 20 20

  21. PARKING DEMAND & SUPPLY Recommended Supply Demand On-Site Off-Site On-Street (2PM Peak) Lease (up to 200 spaces if Options: HS Staff: 210 spaces available) Adjacent: ES Staff: 72 spaces Below-grade 77 spaces Students: 103 spaces ECDC garage for Above-grade Nearby Unrestricted: temporary use only Library/Visitor: 35 spaces Up to 144 spaces (up to 100 spaces Total: 420 spaces Surface under present agreement) A viable option to address demand, particularly for spaces immediately adjacent to APS property; Strategy successfully utilized on past APS projects COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020 21 21

  22. LOCATION OF ON-SITE PARKING Items to consider when determining the quantity and location of on-site parking must include: 1. Maintaining safe school operations during construction 2. Initial capital and ongoing operational/maintenance costs 3. Construction phasing 4. Trade-offs for alternative site uses: a. Geothermal well field b. Stormwater management (APS requirements and broader County goals) 5. Impact on flexibility for future site development 6. Ability to modify (expand or reduce) as parking demand changes COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020 22

  23. ON-SITE PARKING COSTS $30M +/- $15M +/- $5M +/- $0 +/- 450 +/- 250 +/- 500 +/- 150 0 above grade below grade below grade surface COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020 23

  24. SITE DESIGN COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020 24

  25. SITE DESIGN COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020 25

  26. EXAMPLE – APPROX. 450 SPACES ON-SITE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020 26

  27. EXAMPLE – APPROX. 350 SPACES ON-SITE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020 27

  28. EXAMPLE – APPROX. 300 SPACES ON-SITE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020 28

  29. STATUS OF TRANSPORTATION ITEMS 1. Meet parking demand using a combination of on-site and proximate on-street spaces 2. Consider leased spaces as a short-term solution, particularly during construction, not for a long-term solution to meet parking demand 3. General agreement between APS and Arlington County transportation staff that 420 spaces is a reasonable parking demand to expect COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020 29

  30. TRANSPORTATION NEXT STEPS 1. Continue discussions with Arlington County staff, specifically seeking feedback on: a. On-street opportunities for accommodating parking demand b. Location and access to on-site parking c. Proposal for use of right-of-way areas to support school bus/parent vehicle operations 2. Finalize APS staff recommendation for quantity of on-site parking provided 3. Develop concept designs and cost estimates for parking scenarios required by the BLPC charge COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020 30

  31. BUILDING DESIGN COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020

Recommend


More recommend