a quantum leap
play

A QUANTUM LEAP The biggest change in energy efficiency since the - PDF document

16.02.2016 A QUANTUM LEAP The biggest change in energy efficiency since the shift from steam to diesel propulsion machinery Jon ge Eidem, Ulmatec 16.02.2016 ULMATEC Ulmatec Handling Systems AS, Hareid, Norway Ulmatec Components AS,


  1. 16.02.2016 A QUANTUM LEAP The biggest change in energy efficiency since the shift from steam to diesel propulsion machinery Jon Åge Eidem, Ulmatec 16.02.2016 ULMATEC � Ulmatec Handling Systems AS, Hareid, Norway � Ulmatec Components AS, Hareid, Norway � Ulmatec Skipsservice AS, Fosnavåg, Bergen, Tromsø, Norway � Ulmatec Pyro AS, Gamlem, Norway � Ulmatec Engineering AS, Hareid, Norway � Ulmatec Baro AS, Fosnavåg, Norway � Penetrators Norge AS, Stavanger-Ulsteinvik, Norway � Penetrator Inc. Canada, North America � Ulmatec Asia Pte Ltd Singapore � Ulmatec Well Products As, Stavanger, Norway � Powder Tec AS, Surnadal, Norway � Ulmatec Services LLC Dubai, UAE � Ulmatec Baro LLC Houston, North America 4 1

  2. 16.02.2016 16.02.2016 MORE THAN 60 YEARS OF KNOW-HOW Pyro founder Palmar Bjørnøy Cold trips to Shetland – 1940 - 1945 5 16.02.2016 MORE THAN 15.000 SHIPS WORLDWIDE WITH PYRO™ HEATING SYSTEMS 6 2

  3. 16.02.2016 16.02.2016 ÅRETS BEDRIFT MØRE OG ROMSDAL 2014 ÅRETS NYSKAPAR NORDVESTLANDET 2015 7 16.02.2016 Our focus and promise since 2011 … recovering otherwise wasted energy instead of using high- grade energy in the form of oil or gas 8 3

  4. 16.02.2016 16.02.2016 In 2011 we claimed ONLY 30-40% OF ENERGY 60% OF ENERGY IS USED EFFICIENTLY CAN EASILY BE UTILISED 9 16.02.2016 Now, in 2015, we know that CAN BE UTILISED 10 4

  5. 16.02.2016 16.02.2016 PYRO™ WASTE ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM A QUANTUM LEAP � Steam engine The most important energy saving 1800 - 10-15% efficiency / utilisation invention since moving from � Diesel engine 1900 - 30-40% efficiency / utilisation steam engine to diesel engine � Diesel Engine + Waste Heat Recovery 2011* - 40-60% efficiency / utilisation � Diesel Engine + Waste Energy Management 2015** - 60-75% efficiency / utilisation * In 2011 Ulmatec Pyro introduced the Pyro™ Waste Heat Recovery System ** In 2015 Ulmatec Pyro introduced the Pyro™ Waste Energy Management System 11 16.02.2016 RUN YOUR HEATING, COOLING AND POWER SYSTEMS AT MINIMUM COST We see a great many opportunities for huge savings by transferring energy consumption from electricity to waterborne heat… … even generating electric power from waste heat recovery 12 5

  6. 16.02.2016 16.02.2016 MADE POSSIBLE WITH PYRO™ SYSTEMS Traditional products � Fuel Fired Heater � Exhaust gas Economiser � Incinerator System New products 2012-2013 � Waste Energy Recovery System (patent) � Tank Heating System (patent) 13 16.02.2016 MADE POSSIBLE WITH... GREEN TECHNOLOGY from ULMATEC, SPERRE & ANDA OLSEN � SPERRE Pleat & Rack Coolers with their uniqe competence and low pressure drop. � ANDA OLSEN battery technology for energy storage and peak operations together with CLIMEON New products 2015-2017 � De-Icing System (patent) � Ballast Water Management System (patent) � Waste Energy Cooling System (patent) � Waste Energy Power Generation System (patent) � Waste Energy Management System (patent) 14 6

  7. 16.02.2016 16.02.2016 UNDERSTANDING THE ENERGY CONVERSION Caterpillar 3516C (data from engine supplier) kW 2500 Rated power 36,6 % 830 Heat rejection to coolant 12,2 % Heat rejection to exhaust gas 2478 36,3 % 59,7 % Heat rejection to charge air aftercooler 763 11,2 % Heat rejection to air from engine 161 2,4 % Heat rejection to air from generator 91 1,3 % Total effect 6823 100,0 % Fuel consumption L/h kg/h kg/kWh Engine load 100 % 656 564,16 0,226 Engine load 75 % 510 438,60 0,234 Engine load 50 % 372 319,92 0,256 Fuel energy kW Load 6823 Fuel energy KJ/s (kW) 43539 100 % Max. Specific Fuel value KJ/kg 45000 Energy Cost NOx kg/year Effekct Energy/24h Consumption Nox Fuel Cost kW kwh kg/kWh *3) kg/kg *1) USD/kg *2) USD/liter kg/liter KJ/kg NOx tax USD Fuel USD Total USD Engine < 200 rpm (Generator) 1250 30000 0,256 0,1000 2,40 0,86 43539 672 768 - 672 768 280 320 Engine 200-1000 rpm (Generator) 1250 30000 0,256 0,0530 2,40 0,60 0,86 43539 356 567 1 955 721 2 312 288 148 570 Engine 1000-1500 rpm (Generator) 1250 30000 0,256 0,0500 2,40 0,60 0,86 43539 336 384 1 955 721 2 292 105 140 160 Engine >1500 rpm (Generator) 1250 30000 0,256 0,0440 2,40 0,60 0,86 43539 296 018 1 955 721 2 251 739 123 341 Fuel fired heater (MGO) 1250 30000 0,091 0,0036 2,40 0,60 0,86 43539 8 609 695 198 703 807 3 587 Heat recovery 1250 30000 - - - - *1)= kg Nox / kg fuel Engines (200-1000kW og >1500kW) before year 2000, Nox value increase 0,001 kg/kg *2)= USD/ kg. Nox (19,19NOK/8,00USD/NOK=2,40 USD/kg) *3)= Engine speciffic values to be used (e.g. 0.256 g/kWh) 15 *4)= Spesiffic density MGO 0,86 kg/liter 16.02.2016 FUEL SAVINGS Offshore Vessel 120mx22m Engine Installation 5xCaterpillar 3516C 12500 kW Average Engine load 2x50% 2500 Available Waste Energy effect @ 100% engine load 3200 kW Actual available Waste Energy effect @ 50% engine load 1250 kW Crew 120 Ballast Water capasity 5000 m3 Installed cooling effect 15000 kW Operational hours 8760 h Energy efficiency 0,256 kg/kwh Desity fuel 0,86 kg/liter Avearage consumption/year Tropical Area Northern Area Artic Area Effect kW Energy kWh Effect kW Energy kWh Effect kW Energy kWh Heating of accomodation 0 - 150 1 314 000 250 2 190 000 Cooling of accomodation 150 1 314 000 50 438 000 0 - Fresh Water Production 200 1 752 000 300 2 628 000 400 3 504 000 Sanitary Hot Water 25 219 000 45 394 200 50 438 000 Tank Heating - - - Tank Washing - - - De-Icing - - 1000 8 760 000 Ballast Water Treatment - - - Pre-heating of engine at standstill 25 219 000 40 350 400 50 438 000 Total waste energy used 400 3 504 000 585 5 124 600 1750 10 950 000 Fuel Fired Energy 500 4 380 000 Available waste energy 850 665 0 Electricity production 10% efficiency 85 744 600 66,5 582 540 0 - Fuel savings (Liter) 1 264 700 1 698 870 1 955 721 Total Fuel Consumption (Liter) 6 519 070 6 519 070 6 519 070 Total Fuel Saving 19 % 26 % 30 % 16 7

  8. 16.02.2016 16.02.2016 Example of benefits REDUCED PUMP EFFECT = 2000 LITRE FUEL/YEAR Marine gas oil price is going up and down. Currently the cost is about US$500 per tonne and has been up to US$ 960 per tonne, but is expected to increase toUS$1,800 by 2020, and to US$2,300 by 2035 Source: Article by Chad Henderson, Wallenius Wilhelmsen Logistics, October 2014. Adjusted for current prices (September 2015). 17 16.02.2016 PYRO™ WASTE ENERGY COOLING SYSTEM 1 2 3 4 Fixed rpm Frequency controlled Frequency controlled Fixed rpm 18 8

  9. 16.02.2016 16.02.2016 PYRO™ WASTE ENERGY COOLING SYSTEM FUEL SAVING: 800.000 kWh = 200.000 LITRE FUEL/YEAR Example Traditional WECS � Cooling effect: 15.000 kW 15.000 kW � Pump capacity: 4x800m3/h 6x400m3/h � Pumping effect: 4x100 kW 6x50 kW � Energy Consump. 2 pumps: 1.600.000kWh 800.000kWh 19 PLATE HEAT EXCHANGER SPERRE PLEAT COOLER (PHE) 240 MAN-HOURS 1 MAN-HOUR 45 GASKETS 50 DAYS OFFHIRE 1 GASKET 1 DAYS OFFHIRE 9

  10. 16.02.2016 Energy saving solution Fuel savings - Emission reductions Reduced energy consumption on the seawater-pumps due to low pressure drop Rack cooler have no marine growth due to CuNi 90/10 and antifouling paint Chilled water element reduces running time at the chilled-water compressors Heat recovery element makes it possible to use the surplus heat 16.02.2016 PYRO™ WASTE ENERGY COOLING SYSTEM 4 Fixed rpm REDUCED PUMP EFFECT = 200.000 LITRE FUEL/YEAR Four pumps with automatic regulated valves which only pumps the required volume and flow of cooling water. Reduced number of pumps saves energy. A flexible system that works. 22 10

  11. 16.02.2016 16.02.2016 PYRO™ COOLING SYSTEM BENEFITS � Reduced no. of cooling pumps installed � Reduced no. of cooling pumps running � Full control of cooling temperatures � Reduced no. of heat exchangers installed � Full control of circulation pressure � Possible to utilize the waste low temperature (LT) cooling energy � Full flexibility in no. of cooling pump running (automatic start/stop) � Less energy used for cooling water circulation � Monitoring the waste energy utilized - and wasted to sea and air (exhaust) 23 16.02.2016 PYRO™ WASTE ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CASE STUDY – INSTALLATION 140m Offshore Construction Vessel DP3-4 split power system � No. of seawater (SW) cooling pumps reduced from 30 to 12 reduction = 18 � No. of freshwater (FW) cooling pumps reduced from 26 to 12 reduction = 14 � No. of seawater heat exchangers reduced from 20 to 8 reduction = 12 � No. of freshwater heat exchangers increase from 0 to 4 increase = 4 � A minimum of cooling pumps running according to cooling requirement In DP mode: 2-8 SW cooling pumps + 2-8 FW cooling pumps running Normal mode: 1-8 SW cooling pumps + 1-8 FW cooling pumps running � Full flexibility and back-up capacity � DNV GL verified solution � Significant reduction in engineering time � Significant reduction in installation time � Standardised and modulated “plug and play” units 24 11

  12. 16.02.2016 PYRO™ WASTE ENERGY POWER GENERATION SYSTEM EGB EMISSION-FREE HT circuit ELECTRICITY 85C-95C Cooling water 0C – 35C Product range from 150kWe to 600kWe 25 16.02.2016 PYRO™ WASTE ENERGY POWER GENERATION SYSTEM 1300kW WASTE ENERGY ELECTRIC POWER 26 12

Recommend


More recommend