2019 Summa*ve Designa*ons The new version of the Illinois State Report Card November 19, 2019
Steps to the designa*on
Indicators – ELA Proficiency : % of students proficient in ELA on SAT or DLM-AA – Math Proficiency: % of students proficient in math on SAT or DLM-AA – ELA Growth: Average individual student growth percen*les (SGP) in ELA – Math Growth: Average individual student growth percen*les (SGP) in Math – Science Proficiency : Average individual student growth percen*les (SGP) in Science – English Language Progress toward Proficiency: % of English Learners on track to aQain language proficiency within 5 years of iden*fica*on. – Chronic Absenteeism: % of students missing 10% or more of the prior academic year (excused or unexcused absences) – Climate Survey
STEPS • Step 1: Performance is determined on each indicator presented on the previous slide • Step 2: Performance on each indicator is scored. – This step uses the data from step 1 and converts it to an indicator score. Scores range from 0 - 100. • Step 3: Mul*ply your indicator score by the weights of the indicators
Indicator Weight (if all indicators present) ELA Proficiency 7.5% Math Proficiency 7.5% ELA Growth 25% Math Growth 25% English Language Progress to Proficiency 5% Chronic Absenteeism 20% Addi6onal Indicators 2019 Weight (2019) Science Proficiency 5% Climate Survey 5%
38 Scoring Rules- Growth � Growth is measured by Mean Student Growth Percentile (Mean SGP) � Average of individual student growth percentiles (SPGs) � Key criteria for selecting a growth measure was that different student groups have full access to the range of growth scores � Works because students’ progress is compared to students who started out in the same place the year prior
Scoring Rules: English Learner Progress to Proficiency (ELPtP) 29 � Scale Score Gain ÷ Gain Target � If Scale Score Gain ÷ Gain Target ≥ 1 � 100 points � If Scale Score Gain ÷ Gain Target < 1 � Ratio * 100 points � Calculating Gain Targets Identify expected year of proficiency (Baseline year + 5) 1. Find Composite Scale Score equal to 4.8 Proficiency Level 2. � Timeline Target : Proficiency Scale Score – Initial Score / 5 Does not change for 5 years � � Revised Target : Proficiency Scale Score – Current Score / # of years left Updated yearly starting in year 2 � � Always use the smaller of Revised or Timeline Target as Gain Target � Targets after timeline : Current Grade Proficiency Scale Score – Previous Score
33 ELPtP: School Aggregation � Average the individual scores to get the “all student” group score, or a demographic group’s score Name Score Millie 8 Bernard 100 Yaxuan 80.8 School 62.933 � The “all” and EL group indicator scores will be the same, but other groups’ scores may differ.
• Schools are rank ordered by their “all students” group index score to find the boQom 5% and top 10% (54.61 from Step 3) • Index scores of the subgroups are compared to the “all student” group index score of the school just below the lowest 5% threshold
Interac*ve School Report Card
EJH Index Score Calcula*ons 2018 EJH 2019 Difference TOTAL 5 points Total added to total score All 54.61 for Climate 60.1 5.49 Summa*ve Designa*on Survey White 56.65 2018: Commendable 61.06 4.41 2019: Commendable Black or African 44.28 - 0 . 32 43.96 American Hispanic or Latino 57.40 58.87 1.47 Asian 49.56 65.27 15.71 IEP/CWD 62.06 47.55 - 14 . 51 EL 55.91 60.97 5.06 Former-EL 63.84 70.02 6.18 Low Income 48.17 54.76 6.59
Lace Index Score Calcula*ons 2018 LACE 2019 Difference TOTAL 5 points added to All 69.89 total score 81.6 11.71 White 71.91 for Climate 83.09 11.18 Summa*ve Designa*on Black or African 48.46 Survey 2018: Commendable American 67.79 19.33 2019: Exemplary Hispanic or 70.38 Latino 78.42 8.04 IEP/CWD 64.14 85.47 21.33 EL 58.99 79.97 20.98 Low Income 68.18 80.86 12.68 Asian 87.13 87.13
Mark DeLay Index Score Calcula*ons Difference 2018 MARK DeLAY 2019 TOTAL 5 points added to Summa*ve Designa*on All 62.94 total score 15.38 78.32 2018: Commendable White 2019: Commendable 60.04 for 20.19 Climate 80.23 Hispanic or Latino 67.62 2.20 Survey 69.82 EL 58.57 83.36 24.79 Low Income 61.84 18.54 80.38 Second grade enrollments from the prior year, *ed to unique student ID numbers, are used to map to current year third grade achievement scores. Schools are only held accountable for students who were actually taught at their schools in years prior, but who are now old enough to have indicator data.
Recommend
More recommend
