2018
play

2018 Departments May Standard-Based Instruction Student Support - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2018 Departments May Standard-Based Instruction Student Support Services Multi-Lingual Services Categorical Programs (Title/LAP) Instructional Technology HCP & Advanced Programs BTAP Assessment &


  1. 2018 Departments May • Standard-Based Instruction • Student Support Services • Multi-Lingual Services • Categorical Programs (Title/LAP) • Instructional Technology • HCP & Advanced Programs • BTAP • Assessment & Accountability • CTE

  2. Curriculum Connector Agenda 1. Standards Based Instruction/GVC 2. Standards Based Grading and Reporting 3. Adoption Updates

  3. TFL update Standards Based Instruction/SIOP Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol The SIOP Model 1. What is Sheltered Instruction? 2. Why SIOP K-12? 3. How will this be supported?

  4. Review sheltered instruction practices and implementation… To share the rationale and plan for improvement GOAL Four

  5. What is Sheltered Instruction? (GLAD/SIOP)

  6. Sheltered Instruction Sheltered Instruction provides ALL teachers What is with a structured and reliable format that can Sheltered be implemented in any classroom consisting Instruction? of… (GLAD/SIOP) Explicit, direct teaching of vocabulary • High levels of academic discussion • Allowing for scholar talk and multiple modes of processing • Explicit instruction in learning strategies • (metacognition) and opportunities to practice those strategies Multiple teaching models including PBL •

  7. Our Focus The Compelling Why of Our Work Research Based Best Practices and Data Why What FWPS Strategic Plan School Improvement Plan How Equity Driven, Aligned and Responsive System of Support

  8. Data Driven Decision Making Data Review: 1. What are some ELL Data common noticings/data trends? 2. What ? connections/ inferences can be made across Professional Academic the data? Development Achievement

  9. ELL Data: Ever-ELL Population Ever-ELL Exited Population 19% Monitored 5% Never ELL 55% • Active ~21% Active 21% • Monitored ~5% • Exited ~19%

  10. ELL Data: Ever-ELL Population Ever-ELL Exited Population 19% Monitored 5% Never ELL Approximately 45% 55% • Active ~21% Active of all FWPS scholars 21% • Monitored ~5% are NON-Native • Exited ~19% English Speakers

  11. ELL Data: Population (Active & LTEL) Total Active ELL # of Active ELLs that are LTELs FWPS Secondary Elementary 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 Elementary Secondary FWPS Total ELL 3177 1680 4857 LTELs 223 780 1003

  12. ELL Data: Population (Active & LTEL) Total Active ELL # of Active ELLs that are LTELs FWPS Secondary Elementary 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 Elementary Secondary FWPS Total ELL 3177 1680 4857 LTELs 223 780 1003

  13. ELL Data: Population (Active & LTEL) Total Active ELL # of Active ELLs that are LTELs FWPS Secondary 48% of all Active ELL w ithin Elementary grades 6-12 have been in program for more than 5 years 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 Elementary Secondary FWPS Total ELL 3177 1680 4857 LTELs 223 780 1003

  14. ELL Data: Long Term English Learners FWPS – % of LTELs 100% FWPS: 90% • K-5/K-8 – 223 (7%) 80% • 5 th grade – 223 (61%) 70% 60% • Secondary – 780 (48%) 50% • 5 th  12 th – 1003 (52%) 40% • FWPS – 1003 (21%) 30% 20% 10% 0% ELEMENTARY 5TH ONLY SECONDAY 5TH-12TH FWPS K-12 % of LTELs 7% 61% 48% 52% 21%

  15. ELL Data: Exit Rates by District Exit Rates by District: ELL Exit Rates 2016-17 School Year • WA State: 13.6% 40 35 • Auburn: 14.4% 30 • Renton: 14.3% 25 • Kent: 13.5% 20 • FWPS: 11.5% 14.4 14.3 13.6 13.5 15 11.5 11.5 11.5 • Tacoma: 11.5% 10 5 • Highline: 11.5% 0 WA State Auburn Renton Kent FWPS Tacoma Highline

  16. ELL Data ? Professional Academic Development Achievement

  17. Academic Achievement: Math iReady Math At/Above – Winter iReady Math Growth Fall-Winter Benchmark 50 45 40 ALL 35 30 25 Non-ELL 20 15 We expect lower 10 ELL benchmark scores… 5 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 ELL Non-ELL ALL Grades K-2 Grades 3-5 Grades 6-8 Grades 9-12 Grades K-2 Grades 3-5 Grades 6-8 Grades 9-12

  18. Academic Achievement: Reading iReady Reading At/Above - Winter iReady Reading Growth Fall-Winter Benchmark 50 45 40 ALL 35 30 25 Non-ELL 20 15 We expect lower 10 ELL benchmark scores… 5 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 ELL Non-ELL ALL Grades K-2 Grades 3-5 Grades 6-8 Grades 9-12 Grades K-2 Grades 3-5 Grades 6-8 Grades 9-12

  19. Academic Achievement: Vocab. iReady Vocabulary At/Above - Winter iReady Vocabulary Growth Fall-Winter Benchmark 50 45 40 ALL 35 30 25 Non-ELL 20 15 We expect lower 10 benchmark scores… ELL 5 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 ELL Non-ELL ALL Grades K-2 Grades 3-5 Grades 6-8 Grades 9-12 Grades K-2 Grades 3-5 Grades 6-8 Grades 9-12

  20. ELL Data ? Professional Academic Development Achievement

  21. Professional Development • Disparate ratios of classroom teachers with research based training to support Scholars acquiring English: (current staff) FWPS Sheltered – ~60% of K-5 classroom teachers GLAD trained Instruction – ~30% of 6-12 core content area teachers SIOP trained Training (PD) • Varied levels of teacher expertise and training of Sheltered Instruction across FWPS – training models – follow up systems – Calendars • Teacher Feedback – GLAD: Content-dependent (units) and raised a workload concern – SIOP: multiple components (8) unclear where to start

  22. Professional Development • Inconsistent Ownership Expectations FWPS Sheltered – Language Acquisition (LA) strategies embedded in core versus LA occurring outside of core Instruction Implementation • Inconsistent Systems of Supports – Job-embedded supports – Follow-up and check-ins for fidelity with implementation – Look-fors available in curriculum & principal guides • Inconsistent Training Leadership and Staff – Principal expectations for all staff to be trained vs. an opt-in model

  23. Data Driven Decision Making Data Review: 1. What are some ELL Data common noticings/data trends? 2. What ? connections/ inferences can be made across Professional Academic the data? Development Achievement

  24. Data Driven Decision Making Data Review: 1. What are some ELL Data common noticings/data trends? 2. What ? connections/ inferences can be made across Professional Academic the data? Development Achievement

  25. Sheltered Instruction Research Integrated language instruction alongside What do we know content instruction, lowering scholars’ affective about Sheltered filter, which results in… Instruction? (GLAD/SIOP) Increased scholar engagement & motivation • Increased processing time & scholar • achievement Improved academic and language skills •

  26. Sheltered Instruction Research Integrated language instruction with an What do we know emphasis on content, lowering scholars about Sheltered affective filter, which results in… Instruction? (GLAD/SIOP) Increased scholar engagement & motivation • Increased processing time & scholar • achievement Improved academic and language skills •

  27. Addressing the Problem of Practice If we have a consistent K-12 system, ELL Data implemented with fidelity, supported through Achievement ? theory of action, and aligned to our strategic plan… Academic Then we should see an increase in overall achievement data Professional Development Math, Reading, Vocabulary, and ELL Exit rates and progression

  28. Unpacking the ‘IF’ Statement If we have… ELL Data Achievement ? • K-12 Consistency – Common Language – Supports – Routines Academic • Bell-to-bell sheltered instruction Professional • Language access across all content areas Development – Key Academic and Content Vocabulary

  29. Unpacking the ‘IF’ Statement If we have… ELL Data Achievement ? • K-12 Consistency – Common Language – Supports – Routines Academic • Bell-to-bell sheltered instruction Professional • Language access across all content areas Development – Key Academic and Content Vocabulary

  30. Why K-12 SIOP K-12 SIOP Provides: ELL Data • Capacity to implement and support: K-12 – Utilizes similar strategies across GLAD & SIOP SIOP • Same research is used to develop both programs – Allows for a phased-in implementation Academic Achievement • One Component/Feature vs. Full Units Professional Development – Designed to support access to rigorous content • Focused English language acquisition through the development of content knowledge

  31. Why K-12 SIOP K-12 SIOP Provides: ELL Data • Capacity to implement and support: K-12 – Utilizes similar strategies across GLAD & SIOP SIOP • Same research is used to develop both programs – Allows for a phased-in implementation Academic Achievement • One Component/Feature vs. Full Units Professional Development – Designed to support access to rigorous content • Focused English language acquisition through the development of content knowledge

  32. Why K-12 SIOP K-12 SIOP Provides: ELL Data • Consistency across the grade levels K-12 – Common Language – Supports SIOP – Routines Academic • Access to Bell-to-bell sheltered instruction Achievement – Strategies and techniques used ‘a la carte’ Professional Development • Language access across all content areas – Key Academic and Content Vocabulary

Recommend


More recommend