2 nd dire working group meeting
play

2 nd DIRE Working Group Meeting in collaboration with AISME - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2 nd DIRE Working Group Meeting in collaboration with AISME (Accademia Italiana di Scienze Merceologiche) and hosted by the 18 th IGWT Symposium What is sustainable technology? The role of life cycle-based methods in addressing the challenges of


  1. 2 nd DIRE Working Group Meeting in collaboration with AISME (Accademia Italiana di Scienze Merceologiche) and hosted by the 18 th IGWT Symposium What is sustainable technology? The role of life cycle-based methods in addressing the challenges of sustainability assessment of technologies Rome - 27 September 2012

  2. DIRE WORKING GROUP DIRE is a Working Group established in 2010 within the Italian network on LCA D Development and I Improvement of LCA methodology: R Research and E Exchange of experiences to create a platform for discussing and debating LCA methodology developments to create a platform for promoting the exchange of information and knowledge among its participants G. Barberio, L. Rigamonti, A. Zamagni – Rome 27 September 2012

  3. 1 st DIRE MEETING 1 st MEETING of DIRE WORKING GROUP: ECOMONDO 2010: Valutazioni di sostenibilità di tecnologie: quale ruolo per l’LCA? Economia Economia Economia Discussion points: à à t t i i l l i i b b i i n n e e t t s s o o S S - To improve the robustness of the LCA methodology Ambiente Ambiente Ambiente Società Società Società - Needs and opportunities of combining/integrating LCA with other methods - Towards a life cycle-based sustainability assessment G. Barberio, L. Rigamonti, A. Zamagni – Rome 27 September 2012

  4. 2 nd DIRE MEETING “The 18th IGWT – International Society of Commodity Science and Technology - Symposium will focus on the different aspects of the development of innovative strategies following a global approach which is characteristic of commodity science.” What is sustainable technology? The role of life cycle-based methods in addressing the challenges of sustainability assessment of technologies Main question of this 2 nd meeting: What is sustainable technology ? G. Barberio, L. Rigamonti, A. Zamagni – Rome 27 September 2012

  5. TOPIC OF THE 2 nd DIRE MEETING “[…] technology is neither good nor bad; nor is it neutral: technology’s interaction with the social world is such that technical developments frequently have environmental, social and human consequences that go far beyond the immediate purposes of the technical devices themselves, and the same technology has quite different results when introduced into different contexts or under different circumstances” (Kranzberger 1997) [1] . Overall, technologies in a broad sense behave like complex systems, characterized by non-linear relationships, feedback loops, emergent phenomena, and tangled connections among the parts. The concept of technology is COMPLEX due to its consequences and implications on fields not strictly associated with the technology itself and its assessment is QUITE CHALLENGING. [1] Kranzberger M (1997) Technology and History: Kranzberger ’ s Laws ’ , in T.S. Reynolds and SH Cutcliffe (eds) Technology and the West: A Historical Anthology from Technology and Culture (Chicago: Chicago University Press) G. Barberio, L. Rigamonti, A. Zamagni – Rome 27 September 2012

  6. TOPIC OF THE 2 nd DIRE MEETING The assessment of a technology is QUITE CHALLENGING for three main reasons: - Firstly, emergent technologies like nanotechnologies produce products which often are not end products, but can be applied to a quite broad range of (unforeseen) applications - Secondly, many of these technologies are at laboratory scale and thus data availability and scale up effects are open questions which strongly affect the assessment - Finally, rebound effects may occur, when the increased benefit/efficiency gained by the new technology is partly spoilt or turned into a loss. LCA and other life cycle-based methods offer a well-defined basis for the assessment, which however needs to be coupled and/or integrated with inputs from other domains of knowledge. G. Barberio, L. Rigamonti, A. Zamagni – Rome 27 September 2012

  7. 10:30 – INTRODUCTION Chairs: Grazia Barberio (ENEA), Lucia Rigamonti (Politecnico di Milano), Alessandra 10:45 Zamagni (ENEA) 10:45 – OPENING SPEECH 11:00 Paolo Masoni , President of the Italian LCA Network – ENEA 11:00 – KEYNOTE SPEECH 12:00 Stig Irvin Olsen , Technical University of Denmark “ Strengths, weaknesses and opportunities of LCA and life cycle-based methods for the sustainability assessment of nanotechnologies” 12:00 – POSTER SPOTLIGHT 13:00 M. Jorizzo “Life Cycle Approach and Ecoinnovation” M. Del Grosso “Eco-innovation of sand cores in aluminium gravity casting for the automotive supply-chain: an LCA-based analysis M.L. Parisi “Life Cycle Analysis of Dye Sensitized Solar Cell Technology” H. Dura “Efficiency of today’s individual passenger transport with respect to its applicability in urban areas. Comparative assessment of the performance of a light weight vehicle and conventional vehicle in urban living” N. Mirabella “Environmental sustainability assessment of a short wood supply chain” A. Filareto “Development and In-Field Testing of a Sustainability Assessment method for durum wheat cultivation” A. Filareto “Is healthy eating healthy for the environment” The BCFN Double Food Pyramid” A. Fierro “The primary importance of more precise and locally available data for the evaluation of net GHG emissions of N2O by means of LCA applied to agricultural production” V. Tascione “Environmental optimization of waste management systems by integrating LCA and linear programming: a simulation” G. Arcese “Social LCA: a methodology for the application to the tourism sector” G. Barberio, L. Rigamonti, A. Zamagni – Rome 27 September 2012

  8. 13:00 – LUNCH BREAK 14:30 14:30 - PLATFORM PRESENTATIONS 16:45 V. D’Incognito “Modelling biogenic and fossil carbon among domestic wastes with a material flow analysis model” O. Amerighi “Life Cycle Costing of new technologies” P.K. Ramirez “Subcategory Assessment Method (SAM) for S-LCA: stakeholder “worker” and “consumer” F. Thiebat “Life-cycle methods as design tools for assessment of technologies sustainability” J. Ren “An improved Grey Relation Analysis for technologies selection based on Life Cycle Sustainability” A. Filareto “Barilla EPD Process System to increase reliability, comparability and communicability of LCA studies” 16:45 – DISCUSSION 17:30 Wrap up of the sessions, discussion with the audience, draft of a “Discussion Paper” as main outcome of the meeting. G. Barberio, L. Rigamonti, A. Zamagni – Rome 27 September 2012

  9. TOPIC OF THE 2 nd DIRE MEETING All the presentations and the debate that follows will provide food for thoughts for attempting an answer to the main question of the meeting: What is sustainable technology ? Other questions: - Is LCA suitable for assessing new and emerging technologies, such as nanotechnologies? - How can LCA be combined with and/or integrated to other methods to overcome its limits? And is there any risk in this integration process to stretch too much methods that have been initially conceived for different applications? - Are the data and the knowledge necessary to carry out a study of LCSA available? Is there any risk to develop a methodology that is theoretically robust but whose practical feasibility appears to be difficult? - How can the results of the assessment be used and communicated? G. Barberio, L. Rigamonti, A. Zamagni – Rome 27 September 2012

  10. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We would like to take the opportunity to thank all those who supported us in the organisation of this meeting: - the Italian LCA Network and its President Paolo Masoni (UTVALAMB-LCA ENEA) for always encouraging the activities of the DIRE working group, for the continuous scientific support and advices - the Accademia Italiana di Scienze Merceologiche (AISME) and the International Society of Commodity Science and Technology (IGWT) for hosting the meeting and for the organisational support - Roberto Morabito, head of the technical unit UTTAMB of ENEA, for his support, and Diana Savelli and her staff of the technical unit UCREL-COM of ENEA for the publishing of the proceedings - Stig Irvin Olsen for his keynote speech - all participants for their contributions G. Barberio, L. Rigamonti, A. Zamagni – Rome 27 September 2012

  11. PROCEEDINGS Available at http://www.enea.it/it/produzione-scientifica/edizioni-enea/2012/lca-2012 G. Barberio, L. Rigamonti, A. Zamagni – Rome 27 September 2012

  12. DIRE WORKING GROUP Web site: http://www.reteitalianalca.it/gruppi-di-lavoro/dire E-mail: gruppodire@gmail.com Coordinators: Grazia Barberio, Lucia Rigamonti, Alessandra Zamagni If you want to contribute to DIRE activities sign up at http://www.reteitalianalca.it/gruppi-di-lavoro/dire/iscrizione-Dire G. Barberio, L. Rigamonti, A. Zamagni – Rome 27 September 2012

  13. FUTURE EVENTS SETAC Europe 18th LCA Convegno della Rete Italiana LCA: Case Study Symposium: LCA in Italia: ricerca, mercato, Sustainability assessment in politiche the 21st century - tools, trends and application Ecomondo 2012 7 novembre 2012 26-28 November 2012 Rimini Copenhagen, Denmark www.reteitalianalca.it/info/eventi/lca- in-italia-ricerca-mercato-politiche http://lcacopenhagen.setac.eu www.glasgow.setac.eu 11-13th February 2013 Krakow, Poland 12-16 May 2013 Glasgow, UK Abstract submission 23rd SETAC Europe Annual Meeting deadline is 30 October Building a better future: Responsible 2012 innovation and environmental protection Abstract submission deadline is 30 November 2012. www.sac-online.eu/yes2013 G. Barberio, L. Rigamonti, A. Zamagni – Rome 27 September 2012

Recommend


More recommend