1. AIPCE/CEP Introduction 2. Market EU 3. Marketing standards 4. Some Comments
AIPCE CE-CE CEP P – Who ho we are AIPCE-CEP CEP repres esen ents ts the EU Fish Processi essing g and Trade sectors tors . Our mission on is to promote te a positive tive image of the secto tor r and to ensure re that legisl slative tive devel elopm pment ents s fully take into account any impacts s on our secto tor r and t to share e our experti rtise se and knowledge dge for success. ess. 27 billion € value 3.500 companies anies 120.00 000 0 direct ct emplo loyee yees 13.7 millio ion tons/ year r EU consum umpt ptio ion 5.6 millio lion n tons/ year EU import rts
AIPCE CE-CE CEP P – Who ho we are United ted Sweden den Finland and Kingd gdom Belgi gium um France ce Spain Denmark mark Umbrella association of national associations Portuga ugal Germany any Ireland and Nethe therla rland nds Italy Aprox oximati tivel vely a a Norwa way Morroco 80 80-85% % level el of repres esen enta tativeness tiveness
AIPCE CE-CE CEP P – Prior orit ities ies To improve ve the To promote te a Ensur ure the Regulato tory ry positive tive image supply environm ronmen ent CMO/CFP CFP and EMFF Import rt concessio ssions ns Sustaina ainabili bility y WG Reform rm regim ime Traceability ability (IUU and Labelli lling ng WG WG FinF nFish ish Study Contro rol l Regulat latio ions) ns) Food-Law aw WG Trade de WG ACs Competit itiv iveness ness WG
EU TOTAL SUPPLY – ALL SPECIES Fig. 4.1 A Actual supply for consumption and export (f2005 EU [25], from 2006-2012 EU [27], from 2013 EU [28]) 20000 18000 16000 14000 1,000 tonnes live weight 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 e) year Total consumption Export 6
KEY NON-EU SUPPLY COUNTRIES Fig. 4.2 C Volume of wild captured whitefish and pangasius supplied to EU (28) by third countries for 2015 1.000 1,000 tonnes live weight 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Source: Eurostat-Comext Chart: AIPCE 2016 Third country import 7
Source: FAO
FAO/FI Fish Supply-Demand Gap Projections
Marketings standards are old instruments: - Reg 2136/89 : canned sardines - Reg 1536/92 : canned tuna - Reg 2406/1996 : other products Reasons: - fair competition - market transparancy - basis for intervention mechanisme - regulating international trade
Some Comments: For regulated species few reasons to maintain marketing standards For canned sardines and tuna species specific reasons to keep the standards Controles are insufficient and in many MS they have to be paid by fishermen and buyers Min market sizes should be aligned with MCRS to keep it simple and to avoid costs and waste But in some cases the implication of that could be more unwanted sizes of fish on the market Marketing standards less effective with growing international trade Hygene Reg, Controle Reg, Labelling rules, IUU Reg now regulate the markets.
Recommend
More recommend