01 TABLE OF CONTENTS H I S T O R I C A L D I S T R I C T M A P P - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

LANDMARKS PRESERVATION COMMISSION PUBLIC MEETING May 9, 2017 01

TABLE OF CONTENTS  H I S T O R I C A L D I S T R I C T M A P P A G E 3  T I M E L I N E S U M M A R Y ( 2 0 1 5 & 2 0 1 6 ) P A G E 4 - 5  C O M P A R I S O N O F D I F F E R E N T S C H E M E S P A G E 6 - 8  D E S C R I P T I V E C O M P A R I S O N O F O L D D E S I G N T O C U R R E N T P A G E 9  I N S P I R A T I O N – D E S I G N E L E M E N T S P A G E 1 0 - 1 2  M A T E R I A L S U S E D I N D E S I G N P A G E 1 3  S E T - B A C K D I A G R A M P A G E 1 4  C O M P A R I S O N O F P R O P O S E D D E S I G N T O R O O S E V E L T T E R R A C E P A G E 1 5  N E W S C H E M A T I C D E S I G N P A G E 1 6  C A D B U I L D I N G E L E V A T I O N S O F P R O P O S E D D E S I G N P A G E 1 7 - 1 8  A D J A C E N T B U I L D I N G A N D O P E N S P A C E D I A G R A M P A G E 1 9  V A R I O U S S E C T I O N S A N D D E T A I L P A G E 2 0 - 2 4  S U M M A R Y O F R E S P O N S E T O L P C C O M M E N T S P A G E 2 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS 02

JACKSON HEIGHTS HISTORIC DISTRICT MAP DESIGNATED IN 1993 03

TIMELINE SUMMARY (2015) BASED ON AUGUST 11, 2015 SUBMISSION: RESPONSE TO THE LPC HEARING PUBLIC HEARING ON AUGUST 11, 2015: •  REMOVED FULL HEIGHT CORNER ROUND GLASS WRAP AROUND. EXAMPLE OF END TREATMENT WITH GLASS WRAPPING AROUND. IT’S A LOT OF GLASS.  ADJUSTED ELEVATIONS & ELIMINATED WINDOWS WITH 3 WINDOWS/ SASHES IN A ROW WITHIN MASONRY OPENING. • TRI-PORTITE CONFIGURATION WITHIN THE MASONRY OPENING IS NOT  SET BACK NEW STREET WALL BELOW MANDATORY MIN. BASE HEIGHT TYPICALLY IN JACKSON HEIGHT’S AREA. TO 10’ - 0” FROM STREET LINE ALONG 85 TH STREET. TIMELINE SUMMARY OF 2015 04

TIMELINE SUMMARY (2016) BASED ON AUGUST 2, 2016 SUBMISSION: RESPONSE TO THE LPC HEARING PUBLIC HEARING ON AUGUST 2, 2016: •  A SLIGHT RECESS ON THE CURVED WINDOW CORNER ADDED TO THE FRONT FACADES OF 85 TH STREET AND 37 TH AVENUE DID NOT ADDRESS PROJECTION ON THE FRONT FACADES OF 85 TH STREET AND DEMONSTRATED ANY PROJECTIONS, EXTRUDINGS OR RECESSED SO THE DESIGN WAS PLAIN AND SIMPLE. 37 TH AVENUE. •  WINDOW NOW SLIGHTLY HIGHER THAN PREVIOUS DESIGN. WINDOWS AROUND THIS DESIGN WERE NOT HIGH ENOUGH. •  ADDED A VERTICAL COMPONENT AT THE CENTER OF THE TWO FRONT THERE WERE ABUNDANCE OF HORIZONTAL ELEMENTS AND LACK OF VERTICAL ELEMENTS. FACADES TO MINIMIZE SOME HORIZONTAL ELEMENTS AND ASPECT. •  SCALE OF BRICKS AND HEADERS ARE SHOWN. THE ELEMENTS OF STREAMLINE MODERNE STYLE WAS NOT SHOWN ACCORDING TO THE HISTORICAL CONTEXT OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD.  ADDED DESIGN FEATURES OF MODERNE STYLE ARE SHOWN. • LACK OF SCALE ON THE BRICKS AND HEADERS.  THE BUILDING BALCONY DESIGN RESEMBLE THE ROOSEVELT TERRACE • THE 4-STORY DESIGN RESEMBLES MORE LIKE A COMMERICAL BUILDING, BALCONIES. NOT LIKE A RESIDENTAL BUILDING.  GREATER DETAIL EXPRESSED ACCORDING IN CURRENT LATEST DESIGN. TIMELINE SUMMARY OF 2016 05

EXISTING 1-STORY COMMERCIAL BUILDING PROPOSED 4-STORY ADDITION PRESENTED TO LPC ON AUG 11, 2015 PROPOSED 4-STORY ADDITION TO EXISTING 1-STORY COMMERICAL BUILDING AT 84-11 37 TH AVENUE 06

SCHEME PRESENTED TO LPC EXISTING 1-STORY COMMERCIAL BUILDING PROPOSED 4-STORY ADDITION PUBLIC HEARING ON AUG 2, 2016 PRESENTED TO LPC ON AUG 11, 2015 COMPARSION OF THE SCHEME FROM 2015 TO 2016 07

NEW PROPOSED SCHEME SCHEME PRESENTED TO LPC PUBLIC HEARING ON AUG 2, 2016 COMPARISON OF NEW SCHEME TO PREVIOUS SCHEME 08

COMPARISON FROM THE 2016 DESIGN TO PROPOSED DESIGN CURVED CORNER DESIGN OLD (2016) PROPOSED OLD DESIGN: • DOES NOT SHOW RECESSED CURVED CORNER, SO PROJECTED FACADES ON 37 TH AVENUE AND 85 TH STREET WAS NOT APPARENT. • THE CURVED WINDOW HAD TWO HORIZONTAL MULLION DESIGN. • CAST STONE BAND WRAP AROUND TOP AND BOTTOM ON THE CURVED WINDOW. 85 TH STREET FAÇADE (37 TH AVENUE SIMILAR) OLD (2016) PROPOSED OLD DESIGN: • BOTH ELEVATIONS ON 85 TH STREET AND 37 TH AVENUE DOES NOT SHOW ANY BALCONY . • NO SIGN OF PROJECTED FACADES, SHOWN FLAT DESIGN. • LEVELED PARAPET PLANE. • SHOWN (8) WINDOWS PER FLOOR ON BOTH SIDES. DESCRIPTIVE COMPARISON OF THE 2016 DESIGN TO CURRENT 09

NEW PROPOSED SCHEME DESIGN DETAILS INSPIRATION – DESIGN ELEMENTS 10

HISTORIC DISTRIC BUILDINGS: CURVED CORNERS, PROJECTED FACADES 888 GRAND CONCOURSE, NEW YORK • CURVATURE CORNER WITH PROJECTED FACADES INSPIRATION – DESIGN ELEMENTS 11

HISTORIC DISTRIC BUILDINGS: CURVED CORNERS WITH CURVED WINDOWS 1142 GRAND CONCOURSE, NEW YORK • EXEMPLIFY CURVATURE CORNER WITH CURVE WINDOW • LOCATED AT STREET CORNERS INSPIRATION – DESIGN ELEMENTS 12

• EXISTING BLACONY TO MATCH ROOSEVELT TERRACE • EXISTING BRICK WORK ON 1-STORY TO BE APPLIED TO NEWLY PROPOSED 4-STORY BUILDING BY REDLAND INC. MODEL #303 HARTFORD RED (MATCH EXISTING 1-STORY STORE FRONT BUILDING) • CRYSTAL WINDOW SERIES 6000 HEAVY COMMERICAL/ ARCHITECTURAL ALUMINUM THERMAL-BREAK TILT WINDOWS • GAMCO CORPORATION SERIES FG-451T THERMAL-BREAK WITH 1” INSULATED GLASS NEW PROPOSED SCHEME MATERIAL TO BE APPLIED ON THE NEW 4-STORY ADDITION 13

SCHEMATC DESIGN AERIAL VIEW OF EXISTING 1-STORY BUILDING, ADJACENT BUILDING AND ROOSEVELT TEERACE • THE ADJACENT BUILDING ON THE LEFT SHOWS A SET-BACK ALONG 37 TH AVENUE SIDE ABOVE 1-STORY STORE FRONT • KEEP WITH THE EXISTING HISTORICAL CONTEXT OF SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD SET-BACK DIAGRAM 14

COMPARISON OF PROPOSED DESIGN TO ROOSEVELT TERRACE ROOSEVELT TERRACE DESIGN: • 9-STORY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING • BALCONIES ARE AT THE MIDDLE OF THE BUILDING ALONG THE FRONT SIDE OF 85 TH STREET, AT THE SIDES AND REAR PORTRAYING A U-SHAPED DESIGN • DISPLAYING ONLY BRICK ELEMENTS • WINDOWS DESIGN AROUND THE CORNERS ENDS OF THE BUILDING ARE MORE VERTICAL DEPICTED AS TO HORIZONTAL. ALTHOUGH THE WINDOW DESIGN WITHIN THE BALCONIES ARE EVENLY DESIGN ACCORDING TO HEIGHT AND WIDTH PROPOSED DESIGN: • 4-STORY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING ABOVE 1-STORY STOREFRONT • BALCONIES ARE AT THE MIDDLE OF THE BUILDING ALONG THE FRONT SIDE OF 37 TH AVENUE AND 85 TH STREET • ELEMENTS SUCH AS BRICK, CORBELING, AND CAST-STONE BAND ARE SHOWN • WINDOW DESIGN ARE MORE HORIZONTAL AS TO VERTICAL. THE WINDOW DESIGN WITHIN THE BALCONY AREA ARE FAVORED IN HEIGHT AS TO WIDTH. WHILE THE FOCUS ON THE ROUND CORNER MAKING IT WRAP AROUND WITH SLIGHT RECESSED. COMPARISON OF PROPOSED DESIGN TO INTERNATIONAL STYLE 9-STORY ROOSEVELT TERRACE BUILDING 15

ROOF PAVERS ROOF GRAVEL PARAPET NEW SCHEMATIC DESIGN PROPOSED BUILDING BULK 16

NEW PROPOSED BUILDING ELEVATION 37 TH AVENUE 17

NEW PROPOSED BUILDING ELEVATION 85 th STREET 18

COURTYARD 1. CONCRETE PAVERS 2. BUSHES 3. PLANTINGS 4. 42” MASONRY PARAPET 10 FT PARAPET 10 FT 40FT RESIDENTIAL ENTRY/EXIT 30FT SECTION RELATIONSHIP TO ADJACENT BUILDINGS AND PROPOSED OPEN SPACE 19

SECTION THRU STONE BAND 20

SECTION THRU WINDOW 21

SECTION THRU BRICK 22

SECTION THRU BALCONY 23

WINDOW DETAIL 24

SUMMARY OF RESPONSE TO LPC COMMENTS DESIGN SCHEME TIMELINE 2016 2015 PROPOSED SCHEME PROGRESSION OF THE DESIGN ELEMENTS W F I A N C D A CURVED WINDOW O D W E CONCLUSION  THE BUILDING DESIGN EMPHASIZE THE CORNER LOCATION WHICH 85 TH STREET DEMONSTRATED THE USE OF GEOMETRY TO ENHANCE THE DESIGN ELEVATION  DIFFERENT ELEMENTS USED IN STREAMLINE MODERNE STYLE TO BE APPLIED TO THE BUILDING WHILE MATCHING WITH THE EXISTING HISTORICAL NEIGHBORHOOD STYLE SUMMARY OF RESPONSE TO LPC COMMENTS 25