young adults balance sheets and the economy
play

Young Adults Balance Sheets and the Economy May 8, 2014 William R. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Session 1: M Micro a and M Macro P Perspectives on Young Families B Balance Sheets Young Adults Balance Sheets and the Economy May 8, 2014 William R. Emmons and Bryan J. Noeth Center for Household Financial Stability Federal


  1. Session 1: M Micro a and M Macro P Perspectives on Young Families‘ B Balance Sheets Young Adults’ Balance Sheets and the Economy May 8, 2014 William R. Emmons and Bryan J. Noeth Center for Household Financial Stability Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis William.R.Emmons@stls.frb.org These comments do not necessarily represent the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis or the Federal Reserve System. 1

  2. Young Adults‘ Balance Sheets and the Economy  Young adults are different.  Young adults harmed themselves when given more financial freedom.  Young adults harmed the economy, too.  Researchers and policymakers should focus on repairing the damage and preventing a recurrence. 2

  3. The Beginning of the Financial Life Cycle: Assets (and Liabilities) at 21 Assets Liabilities: Actual or implicit Good health College loans Basic education Living expenses Time and energy Shelter No money Save for kids’ education Save for retirement Balance is negative for most young people—you must work your way out of a financial hole. 3

  4. Young People Are Impatient Percent 4 Source: Harrison, Lau, and Williams, 2002

  5. Young People Are Impulsive “[I]mpulsivity in decision-making declines rapidly in young adulthood, reaching stable levels in the 30s.” --Green, Myerson, Lichtman, Rosen, and Fry, “Temporal Discounting in Choice Between Delayed Rewards: The Role of Age and Income,” Psychology and Aging , Vol. 11, No. 1, Mar. 1996, pp. 79-84. 5

  6. Young People Are Bad Drivers 25-year olds = 73-year olds 6 Source: Pence, 2009

  7. Young People Are Bad Drivers 25-year olds = 79-year olds 7 Source: Pence, 2009

  8. Young Adults Make Credit-Card Mistakes “Eureka moment:” When you figure out how to manage a credit- card balance-transfer offer with a temporary teaser rate. 25-year olds = 73-year olds Source: Agarwal, Driscoll, Gabaix, Laibson, 2009 8

  9. Young Adults Make Credit-Card Mistakes 9 Source: Agarwal, Driscoll, Gabaix, Laibson, 2009

  10. Young Adults Make Credit-Card Mistakes 25-year olds = 75-year olds 10 Source: Agarwal, Driscoll, Gabaix, Laibson, 2009

  11. Young Adults Make Mortgage Mistakes 25-year olds = 83-year olds Source: Agarwal, Driscoll, Gabaix, Laibson, 2009 11

  12. Young Adults Make Mortgage Mistakes 12 Source: Agarwal, Driscoll, Gabaix, Laibson, 2009

  13. Young Adults Make Mortgage Mistakes Fully collateralized loans! 25-year olds = 90-year olds 25-year olds = 81-year olds 13 Source: Agarwal, Driscoll, Gabaix, Laibson, 2009

  14. Young Adults Make Car-Loan Mistakes Fully collateralized loans! 25-year olds = 82-year olds 14 Source: Agarwal, Driscoll, Gabaix, Laibson, 2009

  15. The Age-Experience Trade-Off inFinancial Decision-Making Experiential capital Performance = Combination of cognitive ability and experiential capital Peak performance in middle age Cognitive ability 15 Based on Agarwal, Driscoll, Gabaix, Laibson, 2009

  16. Young Adults‘ Balance Sheets: Illiquid, Concentrated in Housing, Highly Levered Demographic Influences on Balance Sheets Marginal effect of belonging to a demographic group on: Safe and liquid Share of assets Ratio of total debt Demographic assets relative to invested in to total assets group annual income housing -16%age pts vs. mid +13%age pts vs. mid +32%age pts vs. mid Young families (< 40 years old) -82%age pts vs. old +16%age pts vs. old +50%age pts vs. old -16%age pts vs. HS +9%age pts vs. HS -4%age pts vs. HS High-school drop-out -34%age pts vs. coll +22%age pts vs. coll -1%age pts vs. coll families -20%age pts vs. +14%age pts vs. +7%age pts vs. African- whites and Asians whites and Asians whites and Asians Americans and Hispanics 16 Source: Emmons and Noeth (2013), based on Survey of Consumer Finances

  17. Part 2: Young Adults Harmed Themselves When Given Greater Financial Freedom  Financial liberalization affected young adults the most.  Young adults were (arguably) the biggest contributors to the housing and credit bubbles. 17

  18. “Exotic“ Mortgages Appealed to Young and Old Percent 18 Source: Chambers, Garriga, and Schlagenhauf, 2009

  19. Homeownership Boomed Among Young and Old Percentage points 19 Source: Census Bureau

  20. Mortgage Debt Exploded Among Young and Old Percent change since 1999 20 Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York Consumer Credit Panel/Equifax based on authors' calculations

  21. Homeownership Collapsed Among 30s and 40s Percentage points 21 Source: Census Bureau

  22. Deleveraging Strongest Among 20s and 30s Percent change since 2007 22 Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York Consumer Credit Panel/Equifax based on authors' calculations

  23. Biggest Homeownership Declines Among 30s Percentage points Remember: A current 50- year old was 30 when the boom began (1994), and 40 when it peaked (2004) 23 Source: Census Bureau

  24. Shouldn‘t CFPB Protect Younger Americans, Too? 24

  25. Young Adults Harmed the Economy and the Harm is Compounding  Empirical evidence suggests young adults contributed disproportionately to the housing bubble and crash.  A generational perspective—following young adults through their life courses—suggests deep wounds that may undermine future growth. 25

  26. Empirical Evidence: Young Adults and the Economy  Household-level evidence (Mian and Sufi, 2011)  Young adults borrowed more aggressively in 2002-06.  Young adults reacted more strongly to house-price increases.  Higher default rates followed more aggressive borrowing and house-price sensitivity.  Family-level evidence (Emmons and Noeth, 2013a, 2013b)  In general, young families have low levels of liquid assets, high concentrations in housing, and high debt.  See table above for our point estimates.  Young families were unusually likely to be homeowners and have high debt in 2007—that is, they were more strongly affected by the housing bubble. 26

  27.  Young Adults Borrowed Aggressively  Young Adults Reacted Strongly to House Prices Inelastic MSAs: Housing markets that had bigger house-price increases, all else equal, due to geographical constraints on new-home construction. Source: Mian and Sufi, 2011 27

  28. Empirical Evidence: Young Adults and the Economy  County-level evidence (Mian, Rao, and Sufi, 2013)  Household spending is very sensitive to housing-wealth shocks.  Higher leverage increases sensitivity of spending to shocks.  Young adults had high and increasing housing exposure and leverage.  State-level evidence (Calomiris, Longhofer, and Miles, 2012)  States with higher shares of young adults had more volatile housing markets.  Higher concentrations of young adults increased the state economy’s sensitivity to the housing cycle. 28

  29.  Strong Response to Housing-Wealth Shocks  Leverage Increases Sensitivity The size of each dot corresponds to the population size of a county. Source: Mian, Rao, and Sufi, 2013 29

  30. Young Adults Loaded Up On House-Price Risk Percent 30 Source: Federal Reserve, Survey of Consumer Finances

  31. More Young Adults => More Volatile Housing Markets Standard deviation of Pacific Census division annual real house prices, 2000-2013, in percent Correlation = 0.468 Mountain South Atlantic New England Middle Atlantic East North Central (incl. Illinois) West North Central East South Central (incl. Missouri) West South Central (incl. Alabama) (incl. Texas) Share of adult population between 25 and 44 in 2004 31 Sources: Federal Housing Finance Agency; Bureau of Economic Analysis; Census Bureau

  32. A Generational Perspective: Generations Since 1900 Currently  The “Greatest Generation,” born 1900-24 90-114 years old (included people who fought in WW II)  The “Silent Generation,” born 1925-45 69-89 (Depression and WW II)  “Baby Boomers,” born 1946-64 50-68  34-49 “Generation X,” born 1965-80  “Generation Y” (also called “Millennials” or 14-33 “Echo Boomers”), born 1981-2000  The “Post-Millennial Generation,” born after Under 14 2000 32

  33. Median Income by Generation 2010 dollars; logarithmic scale 33 Source: Federal Reserve, Survey of Consumer Finances

  34. Median Income by Generation 2010 dollars; logarithmic scale 34 Source: Federal Reserve, Survey of Consumer Finances

  35. Median Income by Generation 2010 dollars; logarithmic scale 35 Source: Federal Reserve, Survey of Consumer Finances

  36. Income Trend of Gen X Has Weakened Percent of Baby Boomers’ level 36 Source: Federal Reserve, Survey of Consumer Finances

  37. All Following Silent Generation Earn Less, Ceteris Paribus 37 Source: Emmons and Noeth, 2014

  38. Median Net Worth by Generation 2010 dollars; logarithmic scale 38 Source: Federal Reserve, Survey of Consumer Finances

  39. Median Net Worth by Generation 2010 dollars; logarithmic scale 39 Source: Federal Reserve, Survey of Consumer Finances

  40. Median Net Worth by Generation 2010 dollars; logarithmic scale 40 Source: Federal Reserve, Survey of Consumer Finances

  41. Wealth Trends of Gen X & Y Have Collapsed Percent of Baby Boomers’ level 41 Source: Federal Reserve, Survey of Consumer Finances

  42. All Following Silent Generation Own Less, Ceteris Paribus 42 Source: Emmons and Noeth, 2014

Recommend


More recommend