wreath product of set valued functors and tensor
play

Wreath product of set-valued functors and tensor multiplication - PDF document

Wreath product of set-valued functors and tensor multiplication Valdis Laan January 30, 2004, Kok o Wreath product of monoids and acts Def. 1 (Act) Let A be a monoid. A nonempty set M is called a left A -act (notation A M ), if there is a


  1. Wreath product of set-valued functors and tensor multiplication Valdis Laan January 30, 2004, Kok˜ o

  2. Wreath product of monoids and acts Def. 1 (Act) Let A be a monoid. A nonempty set M is called a left A -act (notation A M ), if there is a mapping A × M → M , ( k, m ) �→ km , such that 1. k 1 ( k 2 m ) = ( k 1 k 2 ) m for every k 1 , k 2 ∈ A and m ∈ M ; 2. 1 m = m for every m ∈ M . Def. 2 (WP of monoids) Let A , B be monoids and B N a left B -act. On the set A N × B we define a multiplication by (Ψ , g )(Φ , f ) = ( f Ψ ∗ Φ , gf ) , Φ , Ψ : N → A , f, g ∈ B , where ( f Ψ ∗ Φ)( n ) = Ψ( fn )Φ( n ) for every n ∈ N . With this multiplication A N × B becomes a monoid, which is called the wreath prod- uct of A and B through B N and denoted A wr N B .

  3. Def. 3 (WP of acts) Let A , B be monoids and A M, B N left acts. Then M × N becomes a left ( A wr N B )-act if we define (Φ , f )( m, n ) = (Φ( n ) m, fn ) , Φ : N → A , f ∈ B , m ∈ M, n ∈ N . This act is called the wreath product of acts A M and B N and is denoted by M wr N . Theorem 4 (Normak) M wr N is pullback flat iff A M and B N are pullback flat and • A is right collapsible, or • A is left reversible and for all f 1 , f 2 ∈ B , n ∈ N with f 1 n = f 2 n there exists g ∈ B such that f 1 g = f 2 g and gN = { n } , or • for all f 1 , f 2 ∈ B , n 1 , n 2 ∈ N with f 1 n 1 = f 2 n 2 there exist g 1 , g 2 ∈ B such that f 1 g 1 = f 2 g 2 and g 1 N = { n 1 } , g 2 N = { n 2 } .

  4. Wreath product of categories Def. 5 (WP of categories) Given small categories A and B and a functor B : B → Set , the (discrete) wreath product A wr B B is a category defined as follows: WP1 The objects of A wr B B are pairs ( α, b ), where b is an object of B and α : B ( b ) → Ob( A ) is a mapping. WP2 A morphism (Φ , f ) : ( α, b ) → ( α ′ , b ′ ) of A wr B B has f : b → b ′ a morphism of B and Φ = (Φ n ) n ∈ B ( b ) where Φ n : α ( n ) → ( α ′ ◦ B ( f ))( n ) in A . WP3 If (Φ , f ) : ( α, b ) → ( α ′ , b ′ ) and (Ψ , g ) : ( α ′ , b ′ ) → ( α ′′ , b ′′ ) are morphisms of A wr B B , then (Ψ , g ) ◦ (Φ , f ) = ( f Ψ ∗ Φ , g ◦ f ) : ( α, b ) → ( α ′′ , b ′′ ) , where ( f Ψ ∗ Φ) n = Ψ B ( f )( n ) ◦ Φ n . for every n ∈ B ( b ).

  5. � � � � � � Wreath product of Set-valued functors Def. 6 (WP of functors) Given small categories A and B and functors A : A → Set and B : B → Set , the wreath product A wr B is a functor A wr B B → Set , defined as follows: WF1 For an object ( α, b ) of A wr B B , ( A wr B )( α, b ) = { ( l, n ) | n ∈ B ( b ) , l ∈ A ( α ( n )) } . WF2 If (Φ , f ) : ( α, b ) → ( α ′ , b ′ ) is a morphism of A wr B B and ( l, n ) ∈ ( A wr B )( α, b ) then ( A wr B )(Φ , f )( l, n ) = ( A (Φ n )( l ) , B ( f )( n )) . � ( A wr B )( α, b ) ( α, b ) ( α, b ) ( A wr B )( α, b ) ∋ ( l, n ) � (Φ ,f ) ( A wr B )(Φ ,f ) ( α ′ , b ′ ) ( α ′ , b ′ ) ( A wr B )( α ′ , b ′ ) ( A wr B )( α ′ , b ′ ) ∋ ( A (Φ n )( l ) , B ( f )( n ))

  6. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � Limits and colimits Let F : D → A be a functor and denote I = Ob( D ). ( L, ( p i ) i ∈ I ) = lim F : M M M � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � m � � � � � � � � � � q i ′ � q i � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � L L L � � � � � � � � � � � p i ′ � � � � p i � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � F ( i ′ ) F ( i ′ ) F ( i ′ ) F ( i ) F ( i ) F ( i ) F ( d ) i ′ i d ( L, ( s i ) i ∈ I ) = colim F : M M M � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � m � � � � � � � � � � t i ′ � t i � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � L L L � � � � � � � � � � � s i ′ � � � � s i � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � F ( i ′ ) F ( i ′ ) F ( i ′ ) F ( i ) F ( i ) F ( i ) F ( d )

  7. Lemma 7 If D is a small category, I = Ob( D ) and F : D → Set is a functor then lim F = { ( x i ) i ∈ I | x i ∈ F ( i ) , ∀ d : j → i in D F ( d )( x j )= x i } , with the obvious projections. A zig-zag connecting objects c and c ′ in a category C : f 1 g 1 f 2 g 2 f n g n − c ′ . c − → b 1 ← − a 1 − → b 2 ← − . . . − → b n ← If there is a zig-zag connecting two objects, we say that these objects are connected . Connectedness is an equivalence relation on the set of objects of a small category C , we denote it by ∼ and the equivalence class of an object c by [ c ] . Lemma 8 If C is a small category and F : C → Set is a functor then colim F = Ob(el( F )) / ∼ , where the injections s c : F ( c ) → colim F , c ∈ Ob( C ) , are defined by s c ( x ) = [( c, x )] , where x ∈ F ( c ) and [( c, x )] is the equivalence class of ( c, x ) ∈ Ob(el( F )) by ∼ .

  8. Preservation of limits Let ( L, ( p i ) i ∈ I ) be the limit of a functor F : D → A , where I = Ob( D ). A functor G : A → Set preserves it if ( G ( L ) , ( G ( p i )) i ∈ I ) is the limit of GF. Category of elements of a functor Consider a functor J : C → Set. The category of elements of J ( denoted by el( J )) has: • objects: pairs ( c, x ) , c ∈ Ob( C ), x ∈ J ( c ), → ( c ′ , x ′ ) are C -morphisms • morphisms ( c, x ) − f : c → c ′ such that J ( f )( x ) = x ′ . There is a forgetful functor E J : el( J ) → C , E J ( c, x ) = c, E J ( f ) = f, and a functor E op : el( J ) op → C op . J

  9. � � � � � � � � � � � Tensor products −◦ E op F � Fun( C op , Set ) J Fun( C op , Set ) Fun( C op , Set ) Fun(el( J ) op , Set ) Fun(el( J ) op , Set ) D � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � colim � � � −⊗ J � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � Set Set We are interested in the situation where C is small, A = Fun( C op , Set), J : C → Set , and G = −⊗ J = colim ◦ ( −◦ E J ) : Fun( C op , Set) − → Set is the functor of tensor multiplication by J . −◦ E op Fun( B op , Set ) B Fun(el( B ) op , Set ) � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � −⊗ B � F colim � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � Set D � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � −⊗ ( A wr B ) � � � � � � � � � T � colim � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � −◦ E op Fun(( A wr B ) op , Set ) A wr B Fun(el( A wr B ) op , Set )

  10. Results Let D be a small category. Theorem 9 If the functor − ⊗ ( A wr B ) preserves D -limits, then the functor −⊗ B preserves D -limits. Theorem 10 1. If the functor − ⊗ ( A wr B ) pre- serves D -limits of representables, then the func- tor − ⊗ A preserves D -limits of representables. 2. If the functor −⊗ ( A wr B ) preserves D -limits of representables, then the functor −⊗ B preserves D -limits of representables.

  11. If a ∈ Ob( A ) and b ∈ Ob( B ), then δ b a : B ( b ) → Ob( A ) denotes the constant mapping on a . If b ∈ Ob( B ) and k : a → a ′ is a morphism in A , then denoting Γ k = ( k ) n ∈ B ( b ) a ′ , b ) in A wr B B . we have (Γ k , 1 b ) : ( δ b a , b ) → ( δ b (*) For every functor T : D → Fun(( A wr B B ) op , Set ), a , b ) → ( δ b ′ a , b ′ ) in A wr B B every morphism (Λ , f ) : ( δ b (that is, f : b → b ′ in B and Λ = (Λ n ) n ∈ B ( b ) where Λ n : a → a for every n ∈ B ( b )) and every i ∈ I = Ob( D ) � (Λ , f ) op � � (Γ 1 a , f ) op � T i = T i . (**) For every functor T : D → Fun(( A wr B B ) op , Set ), every morphism k : a → a in A and every object b ∈ Ob( B ) (Γ k , 1 b ) op � � T i = 1 T i ( δ b a ,b ) . Theorem 11 Suppose that Ob( A ) = { a } and A wr B B satisfies (*) and (**). If − ⊗ A and − ⊗ B preserve D -limits, then − ⊗ ( A wr B ) preserves D - limits.

  12. References 1 G. Kelly, On clubs and doctrines , in Proceedings of Sydney Category Theory Sem- inar 1972/1973, G. Kelly, editor, volume 420 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag. 2 M. Kilp, U. Knauer, A. V. Mikhalev, Monoids, Acts and Categories , Walter de Gruyter, Berlin New York, 2000. 3 P. Normak, Strong flatness and projectivity of the wreath product of acts, in Abelevy Gruppy i Moduli, Tomsk, 1982. 4 M. Barr, Ch. Wells, Electronic supplement to Category Theory for Computing Science , http://www.cwru.edu/artsci/math/wells/pub /papers.html

Recommend


More recommend