working for biodiversity net gain
play

Working for Biodiversity Net Gain Session 4 Government Road Map - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Working for Biodiversity Net Gain Session 4 Government Road Map Paris 27 November 2018 Why a roadmap? Systems evolve over many years. Example: Evolution of offsetting in Victoria 1989 Regulation of native vegetation clearing An end to


  1. Working for Biodiversity Net Gain Session 4 Government Road Map Paris 27 November 2018

  2. Why a roadmap? Systems evolve over many years. Example: Evolution of offsetting in Victoria 1989 – Regulation of native vegetation clearing • An end to large scale clearing. However offsetting was sporadic and unquantified 1998 – Biodiversity mapping • Extant vegetation, 1750 vegetation, bioregions, threatened species. Provided state-wide information base 2000 – Auction-based incentive program – BushTender • Introduced site assessment, landowner agreements. Development of key techniques outside regulatory Victoria 1750 environment 2002 – Policy - the Native Vegetation Management Framework • No net loss, like-for-like, metrics. However developers found it hard to find their offsets 2007 – Offset market based on credit trading • Third party suppliers, brokers, credit register 2013-17 – Revisions to like for like, information base Victoria 2018

  3. The BBOP Government Roadmap, 2018 What does the document cover? Part 1 : Why should a government plan for Biodiversity Net Gain, and what’s at stake? Part 2 : How can we develop policy for achieving Biodiversity Net Gain and put it into practice in our country?  Phases of planning for BNG & principal elements of a national system  Benefitting from lessons from the past  Elements of a roadmap Backed by Technical Notes

  4. Supporting information: Technical notes

  5. introduction to core roadmap concepts  Phases of planning for biodiversity net gain  Elements of a roadmap  Benefitting from lessons from the past

  6. The four stages • “SWOT”, options and gaps • Establish risks & opportunities, strengths & weaknesses; identify policy options with Analysis their advantages, disadvantages and needs; analyse gaps; assess likely losses and feasibly gains over 20+ years; involve stakeholders; select preferred policy option • Framework with data, capacity and supply of offsets • Put in place the policy framework, gather data, build information systems and capacity Building for the initial BNG/NNL system blocks • Line up supply of offsets ready for launch. • Start any pilot projects. • System in operation • Government administers the system, monitoring and evaluating individual projects and their cumulative progress in achieving the overall policy goals. Launch • Developers must comply with any requirements. • Adapting the system • Broader scope Evolution • Build capacity and data • Adaptive management based on monitoring & evaluation against policy goals.

  7. The four elements  Law & policy: principles that underpin BNG/NNL; statement of policy itself (including whether mandatory or voluntary); biodiversity targets; how policy established (e.g. through a legal requirement supplemented by guidelines); scope and limits of the policy  Supporting measures:  guidelines that spell out the policy and any associated regulations  underlying information needed to apply them  standards, agreements and management plans  financial arrangements  Governance & planning: coordination between different branches of government; integration of BNG/NNL into land-use (& marine) planning & other policies; assessment; oversight, monitoring and enforcement.  Capacity building & partnerships (including pilot projects): building capacity of government, consultants and NGOs, companies and investors, and offset providers and brokers.

  8. The roadmap table The Table integrates: • the four stages & • the four elements

  9. Lessons for success with mitigation • Clear goals and targets for biodiversity outcomes  Improve the application of the entire mitigation hierarchy • Clear, consistent guidance , for certainty and to avoid delays. Remove perverse and conflicting policy signals. Clear roles for national, state and local government and ensure good coordination between government departments. • Adequate monitoring of performance and enforcement of commitments, with adequate budgetary provision for them and good governance mechanisms.  Clear principles and standards for mitigation measures (including offsets).  Legal and financial instruments available to secure long-term implementation. • Plan proportionate approaches , e.g. streamlined procedures. Simple baseline studies and metrics for the least significant impacts on biodiversity. Full assessments with more sophisticated metrics for more significant impacts.  Realistic roadmap to develop the BNG/NNL system. Prepare for implementation of the system (including checking there will be adequate supply of offsets) during the policy development phase.  Good baseline data , mapping and landscape level planning. • Select good methods and avoid those that don’t deliver (e.g. poor metrics). • Support flexibility by allowing options for implementation of mitigation, provided the same standards are met. • Help parties who need to find each other (e.g. those who need offsets and potential providers of offsets).

  10.  Using the roadmap can help Using the BBOP roadmap for government can help:  Assess feasibility of policy options  Assess needs (laws, guidelines, institutions, data, capacity building)  Make realistic plans to improve mitigation over time  Implement plans in orderly, systematic and predictable way  Avoid mistakes of the past!  Benefit from lessons learned and experiences worldwide

  11. Working for Biodiversity Net Gain Thank You Paris 27 November 2018

Recommend


More recommend