work package 2 mutual learning
play

Work Package 2 Mutual Learning WP Leader: APRE, IT WP2: Objectives - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Work Package 2 Mutual Learning WP Leader: APRE, IT WP2: Objectives To transfer knowledge and experience on the day- to-day activities of NCPs To offer one-on-one support and opportunity for exchange of best practices at a more detailed


  1. Work Package 2 Mutual Learning WP Leader: APRE, IT

  2. WP2: Objectives  To transfer knowledge and experience on the day- to-day activities of NCPs  To offer one-on-one support and opportunity for exchange of best practices at a more detailed level than it would be possible through other trainings and workshops.  To improve and professionalise level of NCPs

  3. WP2: 5 TASKS  Task 2.1. Bilateral visits  Task 2.2. NCP training  Task 2.3. Network meetings  Task 2.4. Welcoming package  Task 2.5. Benchmarking: mapping NCP experience and NCP needs

  4. Task 2.1 Bilateral visits Task Leader: RPF, CY (Eleana Gabriel) Task support: AMEUP, HR (Marina Pražetina) Open to all Science with and for Society NCPs (members of the Consortium and Associated Partners) Expected no. of visits: 18 Expected duration: min 1,5 day Expected benefits: exchange of best practices and capacity building

  5. Eleana sent the invitation. First time nobody answered, so Task 2.1 Bilateral visits she sent a reminder Step 2: Each pair of NCPs (host and Step 1: Invitation to submit proposals visitor) submits a proposal to the Task by cut – off dates Force (RPF &HR) Only Israel requested for pluri-lateral visit Host NCP: Smadar Hirsh, ISERD Visiting NCPs: Pascale Van Dinter, BELSPO/STIS - Belgian Science Policy Office Denise Erpen, Euresearch, Switzerland Denise Bartolo, Malta Council for Science and Technology Step 3: Evaluation of Proposals by Task Step 4: Task Leader informs applicants Force (planned output & expected on the selection results. impact of the cooperation) Step 5 : Bilateral visits followed by online communication

  6. Task 2.2 NCP training Task leader: APRE, IT Task support: AMEUP , HR and RPF, CY

  7. Task 2.2 NCP training  Six trainings (M5, M8, M12, M 16, M25, M36) if possible combined with other projects meetings.  groups of maximum 20 participants.  A feedback form to assess the quality and the efficacy of the training sessions will be collected by Task Leader and Task support in order to improve the training quality.

  8. Task 2.2 NCP training  First training (M3) was in March (30th) on RRI. 14 NCPs attended the event in Edinburgh. The training was held by Peter gray, Peter Gray Research adviser, European Projects

  9. Task 2.2 NCP training  The second training (M8) is tomorrow on How to write a successful proposal. The trainer is Maria Habicht - Estonian Research Council  The third training (M12, october) will be in Rome on Legal and Financial aspects of a Horizon 2020 project. The idea is to have it with the Health NCP network and with NCP Academy trainers.  The fourth training (M16, february) on Evaluation of proposals in Spain.

  10. Task 2.3. Network meetings Task Leader: TC AV CR, CZ Task support: ETAg, EE and RANNIS, IS

  11. Task 2.3. Network meetings  The main objective of Task 2.3 is to create a regular meeting platform for the cooperation of NCPs and for the interaction between NCPs and the European Commission as well as with some important stakeholders.  The second objective is to improve the understanding of Science with and for Society policy context for NCPs.  Six network meetings, two meetings for each year of the project (M8, M14, M21, M25, M29, M36)

  12. Task 2.4 Welcoming package Task Leader: MATIMOP-ISERD, IL Supporting Partner: FFG, AT

  13. Task 2.4 Welcoming package The Welcome Package:  Welcome letter to be sent to newcomers  Information about available project activities  Make available: all Training materials and sources of information

  14. Task 2.5 Benchmarking: mapping NCP experience and NCP needs Task leader: MATIMOP-ISERD, IL Task support: APRE, IT and TC AV CR, CZ

  15. Task 2.5 Benchmarking Purpose of the questionnaire and analasys of it:  Identify the needs and expectations of NCPs for additional knowledge  Couple newcomers/less experienced NCPs with more experienced NCPs

  16. Task 2.5 Benchmarking Questionnaire Dissemination:  During KoM and also to all formally nominated Science with and for Society NCPs not present at the meeting On Going throughout the lifetime of the project:  Periodically via the sisncp@mm.etag.ee mailig list

Recommend


More recommend