with late effects of polio
play

with late effects of polio Christina Brogrdh Associate Professor, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The 2nd European Polio Conference Amsterdam // 25-27 June 2014 How to assess walking in persons with late effects of polio Christina Brogrdh Associate Professor, RPT Lund University Sweden One of the most common impairment in persons


  1. The 2nd European Polio Conference Amsterdam // 25-27 June 2014 How to assess walking in persons with late effects of polio Christina Brogårdh Associate Professor, RPT Lund University Sweden

  2. • One of the most common impairment in persons with late effects pf polio is muscle weakness in the lower limbs, which impedes walking ability • In clinical practice gait performance is often assessed objectively • Self-reported walking ability also important to assess - reflects other dimensions than gait speed and distance

  3. How to assess walking in persons with late effects of polio… • Present 2 studies: – Objectively (4 commonly used tests) – Subjectively (Walking Impact Scale-12)

  4. Reliability of Gait Performance Tests in Individuals With Late Effects of Polio Flansbjer U-B, Lexell J. PM R 2010;2:125-131

  5. • Aim: – to assess the reliability of 4 common gait performance tests in persons with late effects of polio • Method: • Timed Up & Go Test (TUG) • 10 meter walk test (fast and comfortable speed) • 6 Minute Walk test (6MWT)

  6. • Participants: – 30 men and women; mean age 63 years – Ability to walk at least 300 meters • Procedure: – Assessed twice (7 days apart) – Comfortable shoes – Common walking aids

  7. • Test-retest reliability – Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2.1) – Mean difference between the two test sessions – Measurement variability • Standard Error of Measurement (SEM%; group of individuals) • Smallest Real Difference (SRD%; single individual)

  8. Results Tests Test sessions 1 Test session 2 Timed Up & Go, sec 10.7 (1.8), 7.1-14.7 10.1 (1.6), 6.1-13.1 Gait speed, sec Comfortable Gait Speed 9.0 (1.6), 6.9-13.5 8.7 (1.3), 6.4-11.5 Fast Gait Speed 6.2 (1.3), 3.4-9.9 6.2 (1.3), 3.6-9.0 6-Minute Walk Test, m 469 (89), 334-699 486 (91), 347-694

  9. Results • Test-retest reliability was high – ICC between 0.82 to 0.97 • Measurements errors generally small – SEM% 4% to 7% (smallest change that represents the real difference for a group of individuals) – SRD% 12% to 21% (smallest real difference for a single individual )

  10. Conclusion • These 4 commonly used gait performance tests are highly reliable • Can be recommended to evaluate various aspects of gait performance in groups of individuals as well as for single individuals in persons with late effects of polio – Evaluate gait speed, distance…

  11. Relationship between self-reported walking ability and objectively assessed gait performance in persons with late effects of polio Brogårdh C, Flansbjer UB, Espelund C and Lexell J. NeuroRehabilitation 33 (2013) 127 – 132

  12. Aim • (i) to assess self-reported walking ability in persons with late effects of polio and • (ii) to determine the relationship between self- reported walking ability and objectively assessed gait performance

  13. Participants • 122 persons with verified late effects of polio – 65 women and 57 men, mean age 65 years – mean time since onset of new symptoms 15 years (SD 8) – all were able to walk independently at least 200 meters • 25% walked with a stick or a rollator • 28% used an AnkleFoot orthosis (AFO) or a Knee- Ankle-Foot Orthosis (KAFO)

  14. Self-reported walking ability • Assessed by the Walking Impact Scale (Walk-12) – 12 items: asks about limitations during the past two weeks in: – walking, running, climbing stairs, standing, distance and effort, need for support indoors and outdoors, concentration and gait quality aspects – Five response options: – from 1 (not at all limited) to 5 (extremely limited) – Sum score reported on a 0-100 scale (%): – 0=no self-perceived limitation and 100=maximum limitation

  15. Gait performance tests • Four objectively gait performance tests: – Timed “Up & Go” test (TUG) – 10 metres Comfortable and Fast Gait Speed tests (CGS and FGS) – 6-Minute Walk test (6MWT) – Reliable in persons with late effects of polio ( Flansbjer U-B, Lexell J. PM R 2010;2:125-131)

  16. Gait performance tests Mean, standard deviation, and minimum (min) and maximum (max) values for Walk-12 and the four gait performance tests in 122 persons with late effects of polio. Outcome measures Mean ± SD Min - Max Walk-12 (%) 51.6 ± 24.7 0 – 100 TUG (seconds) 11.8 ± 4.3 6.9 – 33.2 CGS (seconds) 9.6 ± 2.6 6.4 – 22.0 FGS (seconds) 7.3 ± 2.3 4.2 – 20.3 6MWT (metres) 398 ± 105 150 – 650 TUG= Timed Up & Go, CGS= Comfortable Gait Speed, FGS= Fast Gait Speed, 6MWT= Six Minutes Walk Test.

  17. Relationship between the tests Significant correlations (P <0.01) between Walk-12 and the four gait performance tests (rho -0.66 to 0.63)

  18. Conclusion • The strength of the relationship implies that Walk-12 reflects broader dimensions than the objective gait performance tests • Walk-12 can be a useful tool and a good complement to objective gait tests when walking ability in persons with late effects of polio is evaluated

  19. Thank you!

Recommend


More recommend