white dwarf planetary systems
play

White dwarf planetary systems Alexander Mustill Lund Observatory - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

White dwarf planetary systems Alexander Mustill Lund Observatory Collaborators: Amy Bonsor, Melvyn B. Davies, Jay Farihi, Boris Gnsicke, Ral Maldonado, Chris Manser, Dimitri Veras, Eva Villaver, Mark Wyatt, White dwarfs tell us what


  1. White dwarf planetary systems Alexander Mustill Lund Observatory Collaborators: Amy Bonsor, Melvyn B. Davies, Jay Farihi, Boris Gänsicke, Raúl Maldonado, Chris Manser, Dimitri Veras, Eva Villaver, Mark Wyatt, …

  2. White dwarfs tell us what extra-Solar planets and asteroids are made of Alexander Mustill (Lund University) — Compact Objects For All — 2020-02-11

  3. White dwarfs tell us what extra-Solar planets and asteroids are made of • ~50% of WDs show metal lines in their spectra Alexander Mustill (Lund University) — Compact Objects For All — 2020-02-11

  4. White dwarfs tell us what extra-Solar planets and asteroids are made of • ~50% of WDs show metal lines in their spectra • Metals should sink on short timescales: accretion is ongoing or recent Alexander Mustill (Lund University) — Compact Objects For All — 2020-02-11

  5. White dwarfs tell us what extra-Solar planets and asteroids are made of • ~50% of WDs show metal lines in their spectra • Metals should sink on short timescales: accretion is ongoing or recent • Leading candidate: pulverised asteroids/planets scattered close to the WD Alexander Mustill (Lund University) — Compact Objects For All — 2020-02-11

  6. White dwarfs tell us what extra-Solar planets and asteroids are made of • ~50% of WDs show metal lines in their spectra • Metals should sink on short timescales: accretion is ongoing or recent • Leading candidate: pulverised asteroids/planets scattered close to the WD • Composition gives us insight into planetary and asteroidal compositions beyond the Solar System (review: Jura & Young 2014) Alexander Mustill (Lund University) — Compact Objects For All — 2020-02-11

  7. White dwarf planetary systems: discs and close-in planetesimals Alexander Mustill (Lund University) — Compact Objects For All — 2020-02-11

  8. White dwarf planetary systems: discs and close-in planetesimals Spectroscopic signatures of accreted metals (~45% • flux of WDs, Wilson et al. 2019) and possible planet (Gänsicke et al. 2019) λ Alexander Mustill (Lund University) — Compact Objects For All — 2020-02-11

  9. White dwarf planetary systems: discs and close-in planetesimals Spectroscopic signatures of accreted metals (~45% • flux of WDs, Wilson et al. 2019) and possible planet (Gänsicke et al. 2019) λ Dust discs detected through IR excesses (~1.5% of • flux WDs, Wilson et al. 2019) λ Alexander Mustill (Lund University) — Compact Objects For All — 2020-02-11

  10. White dwarf planetary systems: discs and close-in planetesimals Spectroscopic signatures of accreted metals (~45% • flux of WDs, Wilson et al. 2019) and possible planet (Gänsicke et al. 2019) λ Dust discs detected through IR excesses (~1.5% of • flux WDs, Wilson et al. 2019) λ Gas discs detected through Keplerian emission • flux features (~0.1% of WDs, Gänsicke et al. 2007, Manser et al. 2020) λ Alexander Mustill (Lund University) — Compact Objects For All — 2020-02-11

  11. White dwarf planetary systems: discs and close-in planetesimals Spectroscopic signatures of accreted metals (~45% • flux of WDs, Wilson et al. 2019) and possible planet (Gänsicke et al. 2019) λ Dust discs detected through IR excesses (~1.5% of • flux WDs, Wilson et al. 2019) λ Gas discs detected through Keplerian emission • flux features (~0.1% of WDs, Gänsicke et al. 2007, Manser et al. 2020) λ Transits of disintegrating asteroids (2 known, • flux Vanderburg et al. 2015, Vanderbosch et al. 2019) time Alexander Mustill (Lund University) — Compact Objects For All — 2020-02-11

  12. White dwarf planetary systems: discs and close-in planetesimals Spectroscopic signatures of accreted metals (~45% • flux of WDs, Wilson et al. 2019) and possible planet (Gänsicke et al. 2019) λ Dust discs detected through IR excesses (~1.5% of • flux WDs, Wilson et al. 2019) λ Gas discs detected through Keplerian emission • flux features (~0.1% of WDs, Gänsicke et al. 2007, Manser et al. 2020) λ Transits of disintegrating asteroids (2 known, • flux Vanderburg et al. 2015, Vanderbosch et al. 2019) time line strength and shape Spectral signatures of non-transiting asteroids • (1 known, Manser,…, Mustill et al. 2019) time Alexander Mustill (Lund University) — Compact Objects For All — 2020-02-11

  13. Unifying idea: Material is driven towards the WD on highly-eccentric orbits by large bodies in the outer system. It undergoes orbital circularisation, pulverisation and vaporisation, forms a close-in disc, and ultimately accretes onto the WD. Reviews: Farihi 2016 (observations), Veras 2016 (theory) Alexander Mustill (Lund University) — Compact Objects For All — 2020-02-11

  14. How and why does material get close to the white dwarf? AGB star loses mass (50% for 1M ⊙ ) and increases in radius (1au for 1M ⊙ ) Stellar radius Mustill & Villaver 2012 Alexander Mustill (Lund University) — Compact Objects For All — 2020-02-11

  15. How and why does material get close to the white dwarf? AGB star loses mass (50% for 1M ⊙ ) and increases in radius (1au for 1M ⊙ ) Planets escaped Stellar mass loss causes orbit expansion to conserve L = [ GM ★ a (1 - e 2 )] 1/2 Stellar radius Mustill & Villaver 2012 Alexander Mustill (Lund University) — Compact Objects For All — 2020-02-11

  16. How and why does material get close to the white dwarf? AGB star loses mass (50% for 1M ⊙ ) and increases in radius (1au for 1M ⊙ ) Planets escaped Stellar mass loss causes orbit expansion to conserve L = [ GM ★ a (1 - e 2 )] 1/2 Planets engulfed Stellar radius expansion strengthens tides Stellar radius Mustill & Villaver 2012 Alexander Mustill (Lund University) — Compact Objects For All — 2020-02-11

  17. exoplanets.org | 3/28/2017 3.0 10 3 ♃ 2.5 Planet Mass [Earth Mass] Mass of Star [Solar Mass] ♄ 100 Present-day Solar radius 2.0 ♆ ⛢ 10 1.5 ⊕ ♀ 1 1.0 ♂ ☿ 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.01 -3 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 10 Semi-Major Axis [Astronomical Units (AU)]

  18. exoplanets.org | 3/28/2017 3.0 10 3 ♃ 2.5 Planet Mass [Earth Mass] Mass of Star [Solar Mass] ♄ 100 Present-day Solar radius 2.0 ♆ ⛢ 10 1.5 Engulfed by giant star Survive engulfment ⊕ ♀ 1 1.0 ♂ ☿ 0.5 0.1 Mustill & Villaver 2012 survival limit 0.0 0.01 -3 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 10 Semi-Major Axis [Astronomical Units (AU)]

  19. WDs observed typically descend from single stars slightly more massive than Sun Alexander Mustill (Lund University) — Compact Objects For All — 2020-02-11

  20. WDs observed typically descend from single stars slightly more massive than Sun Few in number Alexander Mustill (Lund University) — Compact Objects For All — 2020-02-11

  21. WDs observed typically descend from single stars slightly more massive than Sun Have not Few in number evolved Alexander Mustill (Lund University) — Compact Objects For All — 2020-02-11

  22. WDs observed typically descend from single stars slightly more massive than Sun Have not Few in number evolved Koester et al 2014 Typical exoplanet surveys Alexander Mustill (Lund University) — Compact Objects For All — 2020-02-11

  23. Asteroid delivery by destabilised planetary systems Alexander Mustill (Lund University) — Compact Objects For All — 2020-02-11

  24. Asteroid delivery by destabilised planetary systems • Loss of stellar mass also increase the planet:star mass ratio. This ratio sets the timescale and strength of planet–planet and planet– asteroid interactions Alexander Mustill (Lund University) — Compact Objects For All — 2020-02-11

  25. Asteroid delivery by destabilised planetary systems • Loss of stellar mass also increase the planet:star mass ratio. This ratio sets the timescale and strength of planet–planet and planet– asteroid interactions • E.g., the Hill spheres of planets expand: r H = a ( M pl /3 M ★ ) 1/3 Alexander Mustill (Lund University) — Compact Objects For All — 2020-02-11

  26. Asteroid delivery by destabilised planetary systems • Loss of stellar mass also increase the planet:star mass ratio. This ratio sets the timescale and strength of planet–planet and planet– asteroid interactions • E.g., the Hill spheres of planets expand: r H = a ( M pl /3 M ★ ) 1/3 • This destabilises formerly stable systems (Debes & Sigurdsson 2002, Mustill et al., 2014, 2018) Alexander Mustill (Lund University) — Compact Objects For All — 2020-02-11

  27. Asteroid delivery by destabilised planetary systems • Loss of stellar mass also increase the planet:star mass ratio. This ratio sets the timescale and strength of planet–planet and planet– asteroid interactions • E.g., the Hill spheres of planets expand: r H = a ( M pl /3 M ★ ) 1/3 • This destabilises formerly stable systems (Debes & Sigurdsson 2002, Mustill et al., 2014, 2018) Mustill et al 2014 Alexander Mustill (Lund University) — Compact Objects For All — 2020-02-11

  28. Asteroid delivery by destabilised planetary systems Frewen & Hansen (2014) showed that an eccentric, low-mass (super-Earth or Neptune) planet is an efficient deliverer of material, but did not look at the origin of the eccentricity Alexander Mustill (Lund University) — Compact Objects For All — 2020-02-11

Recommend


More recommend