what syntax doesn t feed semantics fake indexicals as
play

What syntax doesnt feed semantics Fake indexicals as indexicals - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

What syntax doesnt feed semantics Fake indexicals as indexicals Emar Maier ILLC/University of Amsterdam www.ru.nl/ncs/~emar ESSLLI Workshop What syntax feeds semantics?, Hamburg August 11, 2008 Introduction Fake indexicals . . . as


  1. What syntax doesn’t feed semantics Fake indexicals as indexicals Emar Maier ILLC/University of Amsterdam www.ru.nl/ncs/~emar ESSLLI Workshop ‘What syntax feeds semantics?’, Hamburg August 11, 2008

  2. Introduction Fake indexicals . . . as indexicals De se binding and de re acquaintance Introduction: I • Kaplan (1977,1989): • I is indexical, like today 1. context-dependent 2. directly referential • 2D semantics I am speaking �≡ the speaker is speaking • Heim (1991,2008), Kratzer (1998,2008), Jacobson (2008): • I is a pronoun, like he • pronouns have bound and referential readings Only I did my homework sloppy others didn’t do theirs: ∀ x [ x � = i → ¬ do . hw ( x , x )] • today: defend Kaplan Emar Maier What syntax doesn’t feed semantics Fake indexicals as indexicals

  3. Introduction Fake indexicals . . . as indexicals De se binding and de re acquaintance Introduction: I • Kaplan (1977,1989): • I is indexical, like today 1. context-dependent 2. directly referential • 2D semantics I am speaking �≡ the speaker is speaking • Heim (1991,2008), Kratzer (1998,2008), Jacobson (2008): • I is a pronoun, like he • pronouns have bound and referential readings Only I did my homework sloppy others didn’t do theirs: ∀ x [ x � = i → ¬ do . hw ( x , x )] • today: defend Kaplan Emar Maier What syntax doesn’t feed semantics Fake indexicals as indexicals

  4. Introduction Fake indexicals . . . as indexicals De se binding and de re acquaintance Introduction: I • Kaplan (1977,1989): • I is indexical, like today 1. context-dependent 2. directly referential • 2D semantics I am speaking �≡ the speaker is speaking • Heim (1991,2008), Kratzer (1998,2008), Jacobson (2008): • I is a pronoun, like he • pronouns have bound and referential readings Only I did my homework sloppy others didn’t do theirs: ∀ x [ x � = i → ¬ do . hw ( x , x )] • today: defend Kaplan Emar Maier What syntax doesn’t feed semantics Fake indexicals as indexicals

  5. Introduction Fake indexicals . . . as indexicals De se binding and de re acquaintance Introduction: I • Kaplan (1977,1989): • I is indexical, like today 1. context-dependent 2. directly referential • 2D semantics I am speaking �≡ the speaker is speaking • Heim (1991,2008), Kratzer (1998,2008), Jacobson (2008): • I is a pronoun, like he • pronouns have bound and referential readings Only I did my homework sloppy others didn’t do theirs: ∀ x [ x � = i → ¬ do . hw ( x , x )] • today: defend Kaplan Emar Maier What syntax doesn’t feed semantics Fake indexicals as indexicals

  6. Introduction Fake indexicals . . . as indexicals De se binding and de re acquaintance Outline 1 Introduction 2 Fake indexicals Pronouns in Generative Linguistics VP ellipsis Only 3 . . . as indexicals Ellipsis resolution by unification Only by unification Avoiding sloppy names 4 De se binding and de re acquaintance Avoiding de se names Emar Maier What syntax doesn’t feed semantics Fake indexicals as indexicals

  7. Introduction Pronouns in Generative Linguistics Fake indexicals VP ellipsis . . . as indexicals Only De se binding and de re acquaintance Outline 1 Introduction 2 Fake indexicals Pronouns in Generative Linguistics VP ellipsis Only 3 . . . as indexicals Ellipsis resolution by unification Only by unification Avoiding sloppy names 4 De se binding and de re acquaintance Avoiding de se names Emar Maier What syntax doesn’t feed semantics Fake indexicals as indexicals

  8. � � Introduction Pronouns in Generative Linguistics Fake indexicals VP ellipsis . . . as indexicals Only De se binding and de re acquaintance The syntax-semantics interface DS SS � � � � � wh ,... QR � � � � � � � � � � � LF PF L � � m Emar Maier What syntax doesn’t feed semantics Fake indexicals as indexicals

  9. � � Introduction Pronouns in Generative Linguistics Fake indexicals VP ellipsis . . . as indexicals Only De se binding and de re acquaintance The syntax-semantics interface DS SS � � � � � wh ,... QR � � � � � � � � � � � LF PF L � � m Emar Maier What syntax doesn’t feed semantics Fake indexicals as indexicals

  10. � � Introduction Pronouns in Generative Linguistics Fake indexicals VP ellipsis . . . as indexicals Only De se binding and de re acquaintance The syntax-semantics interface DS SS � � � � ��������������� � � wh ,... QR � � � � � � � � � � � LF PF L � � m Emar Maier What syntax doesn’t feed semantics Fake indexicals as indexicals

  11. Introduction Pronouns in Generative Linguistics Fake indexicals VP ellipsis . . . as indexicals Only De se binding and de re acquaintance Binding and coreference SS: John did his homework ւ ց Emar Maier What syntax doesn’t feed semantics Fake indexicals as indexicals

  12. Introduction Pronouns in Generative Linguistics Fake indexicals VP ellipsis . . . as indexicals Only De se binding and de re acquaintance Binding and coreference SS: John did his homework ւ ց LF: [John did his homework] Emar Maier What syntax doesn’t feed semantics Fake indexicals as indexicals

  13. Introduction Pronouns in Generative Linguistics Fake indexicals VP ellipsis . . . as indexicals Only De se binding and de re acquaintance Binding and coreference SS: John did his homework ւ ց LF: [John did his homework] ↓ L : do . homework . of ( j , x ) Emar Maier What syntax doesn’t feed semantics Fake indexicals as indexicals

  14. Introduction Pronouns in Generative Linguistics Fake indexicals VP ellipsis . . . as indexicals Only De se binding and de re acquaintance Binding and coreference SS: John did his homework ւ ց LF: [John did his homework] ↓ L : do . homework . of ( j , x ) ↓ m : � do . homework . of ( j , x ) � f w = 1 iff John did homework of f ( x ) Emar Maier What syntax doesn’t feed semantics Fake indexicals as indexicals

  15. Introduction Pronouns in Generative Linguistics Fake indexicals VP ellipsis . . . as indexicals Only De se binding and de re acquaintance Binding and coreference SS: John did his homework ւ ց LF: [John did his homework] ↓ L : do . homework . of ( j , x ) ↓ m : � do . homework . of ( j , x ) � f w = 1 iff John did homework of f ( x ) context: his = f ( x ) = John Emar Maier What syntax doesn’t feed semantics Fake indexicals as indexicals

  16. Introduction Pronouns in Generative Linguistics Fake indexicals VP ellipsis . . . as indexicals Only De se binding and de re acquaintance Binding and coreference SS: John did his homework ւ ց John 1 [ t 1 did his 1 homework] LF: [John did his homework] ↓ L : do . homework . of ( j , x ) ↓ m : � do . homework . of ( j , x ) � f w = 1 iff John did homework of John context: his = f ( x ) = John Emar Maier What syntax doesn’t feed semantics Fake indexicals as indexicals

  17. Introduction Pronouns in Generative Linguistics Fake indexicals VP ellipsis . . . as indexicals Only De se binding and de re acquaintance Binding and coreference SS: John did his homework ւ ց John 1 [ t 1 did his 1 homework] LF: [John did his homework] ↓ ↓ L : do . homework . of ( j , x ) λ x [ do . homework . of ( x , x )]( j ) ↓ m : � do . homework . of ( j , x ) � f w = 1 iff John did homework of John context: his = f ( x ) = John Emar Maier What syntax doesn’t feed semantics Fake indexicals as indexicals

  18. Introduction Pronouns in Generative Linguistics Fake indexicals VP ellipsis . . . as indexicals Only De se binding and de re acquaintance Binding and coreference SS: John did his homework ւ ց John 1 [ t 1 did his 1 homework] LF: [John did his homework] ↓ ↓ L : do . homework . of ( j , x ) do . homework . of ( j , j ) ↓ m : � do . homework . of ( j , x ) � f w = 1 iff John did homework of John context: his = f ( x ) = John Emar Maier What syntax doesn’t feed semantics Fake indexicals as indexicals

  19. Introduction Pronouns in Generative Linguistics Fake indexicals VP ellipsis . . . as indexicals Only De se binding and de re acquaintance Binding and coreference SS: John did his homework ւ ց John 1 [ t 1 did his 1 homework] LF: [John did his homework] ↓ ↓ L : do . homework . of ( j , x ) do . homework . of ( j , j ) ↓ ↓ m : � do . homework . of ( j , x ) � f � do . homework . of ( j , j ) � f w = 1 w = 1 iff iff John did homework of John John did homework of John context: his = f ( x ) = John Emar Maier What syntax doesn’t feed semantics Fake indexicals as indexicals

  20. Introduction Pronouns in Generative Linguistics Fake indexicals VP ellipsis . . . as indexicals Only De se binding and de re acquaintance VP ellipsis PF: John likes his dad but Peter doesn’t • ambiguous: strict: Peter doesn’t like John’s sloppy: Peter doesn’t like his own Emar Maier What syntax doesn’t feed semantics Fake indexicals as indexicals

Recommend


More recommend