water supply plan
play

Water Supply Plan Public Workshop at the University of North - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Draft North Florida Regional Water Supply Plan Public Workshop at the University of North Florida October 25, 2016 Scott Laidlaw, P.G. St. Johns River Water Management District Amy Brown, Ph.D. Suwannee River Water Management District


  1. Draft North Florida Regional Water Supply Plan Public Workshop at the University of North Florida October 25, 2016 Scott Laidlaw, P.G. St. Johns River Water Management District Amy Brown, Ph.D. Suwannee River Water Management District

  2. Outline of today’s discussion • North Florida Water Supply Partnership • Florida statutes and regional water supply planning • North Florida Regional Water Supply Plan - NFRWSP 2

  3. North Florida Regional Water Supply Partnership 3

  4. North Florida Regional Water Supply Partnership • Regional water supply planning – Stakeholder Advisory Committee • Minimum flows and minimum levels • Groundwater modeling • Hydrologic data • Project development • Conservation and irrigation efficiency 4

  5. 35 Stakeholder Advisory Committee meetings Stakeholder Group SJRWMD Member SRWMD Member Public Supply Rick Hutton, P.E. Stephen Roberts Gainesville Regional Utilities Lake City Utilities Agriculture Kerry Kates Thomas Harper Florida Fruit and Vegetable Harper Farms Association Commercial/Power Nancy Kilgo Veasey James Cornett Generation JEA Cornett’s Spirit of the Suwannee, Inc. Environmental Patrick T. Welsh, Ph.D. Jacqui Sulek UNF and Save Our Lakes Audubon Florida Industrial/Mining J. Michael O’Berry Terry L. Baker, P.E. Vulcan Materials Company PotashCorp – Phosphate Division Local Government Lee Pinkoson Gene Higginbotham Commissioner, Alachua County Commissioner, Dixie County 5

  6. Outreach and collaboration 35 SAC meetings 6

  7. Regional water supply planning, §373.709, F .S. The governing board of each water management district shall conduct water supply planning for a water supply planning region …, where it determines that existing sources of water are not adequate to supply water for all existing and future reasonable-beneficial uses and to sustain the water resources and related natural systems for the planning period. 7

  8. What is a regional water supply plan (RWSP)? Constitutes an assessment of: • how much water needed over the planning horizon and • whether the traditional sources meet the demand While: • protecting the water resources and related natural systems and • identifying future water supply sources 8

  9. RWSP process • 20-year planning horizon • Conducted in open public process • Identifies supply sources/water resource development projects to meet all reasonable- beneficial demands • Approved by Governing Board • Updated on a 5-year basis 9

  10. Is a RWSP similar to a capital facilities plan? No – – WSPs focus on sustainability of resources – Point to or identify options for water supply, strategies, and AWS projects  economic feasibility  environmental feasibility  technical feasibility 10

  11. Are users required to implement RWSP options? No – • Water users are not required to implement any of the options identified • Users may offer one of these alternatives to mitigate impacts for new permits or when requesting increases in allocations 11

  12. Will a RWSP affect consumptive (water) use permits? No – • This is a plan, not a regulatory requirement • The plan contains strategies – conservation concepts – essential to all water use permits – reclaimed water and AWS feasibility evaluations – lowest quality source 12

  13. NFRWSP – planning process • NFSEG regional groundwater flow model • Water use and future projections • Water resource analysis • Water supply development and water resource development projects • Water conservation and reuse 13

  14. NFSEG regional groundwater flow model overview 14

  15. Water ter use use and pr and projections ojections for t or the he NFRWSP NFRWSP ar area ea Category 2010 2035 Change % Change Public Supply 198 256 58 29 Domestic Self-Supply and 49 61 12 24 Small Utilities Agriculture 135 153 18 13 Commercial / Industrial / Institutional and Mining / 121 132 11 9 Dewatering Landscape / Recreation / 22 31 9 41 Aesthetic Power Generation 25 34 9 36 Total 550 667 117 21 Numbers may differ slightly due to rounding Values shown in million gallons per day. Values do not include NWFWMD, SWFWMD or Georgia 15

  16. Historic Water Use and Population -vs- Projected Water Demand and Population in NFRWSP 1000 2,750,000 900 2,475,000 800 2,200,000 Million Gallons Per Day 700 1,925,000 Population 600 1,650,000 500 1,375,000 400 1,100,000 300 825,000 200 550,000 100 275,000 0 0 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 Year Public Supply Agriculture Commercial / Industrial / Institutional & Mining / Dewatering Landscape / Recreational / Aesthetic Domestic Self-Supply Power Generation Population 16

  17. The region’s challenge Estimate 667 mgd of water need at 2035 117 mgd potential Range of recovery needed by for the Lower 2035 Santa Fe and Ichetucknee MFLs 550 mgd in 2010 WRD projects are predicted to reduce withdrawal effects to priority water bodies. 17

  18. Water resource analysis • Assessed the amount of fresh groundwater available to meet 2035 demands using NFSEG model • Determined impacts to water resources ‒ groundwater quality ‒ wetlands ‒ MFLs ‒ spring flows ‒ non-MFL priority water bodies 18

  19. Analysis results determined that: • Traditional groundwater sources can meet some, but not all, projected water needs • Water demand projections exceed fresh groundwater availability • There are wells with elevated chlorides, and increasing chloride trends • There are springs and rivers below MFLs • There are potential impacts to non-MFL springs or other waterbodies 19

  20. Estimated changes in drawdown based on Demand Projections 2035 with WRD projects 2035 without WRD projects 20

  21. Groundwater quality concerns Chloride Trends – Rate Number of Wells Number of Wells Expected of Change Currently >250 mg/l >250 mg/L by 2035 > 3mg/L per year 5 11 1 to 3 mg/L per year 0 1 21

  22. Surface water constraints 22

  23. Proposed Water Resource Caution Area 23

  24. Since constraints are not met • The plan identifies projects to meet future demands while meeting the needs of the water resources • The projects include a combination of water resource development, water supply development, conservation, reclaimed water or other projects • The total sum of projects exceeds the shortfall; these projects are identified to show that future demands can be met through a combination of alternatives 24

  25. Opportunities and solutions • Water conservation • Recharge • Alternative water supply – Surface water – Stormwater harvesting – Reuse • Collaboration 25

  26. Water conservation • Indoors • Outdoors • Rates • Education 26

  27. 2035 Low and high water conservation potential 27

  28. Diversification of water supplies: Excess surface water or storm water 28

  29. Reuse options Augmentation of surface waters used Landscape irrigation for irrigation Recharge Potable reuse Rebound (in feet) for 10 MGD Golf course irrigation injection 29

  30. 20 2015 15 Reu euse se an and d was aste tewate ter r disp dispos osal al 30

  31. Water resource development projects Number of Quantity Water Estimated Cost Type Projects Produced (mgd) ($M) Groundwater 2 10.30 3.80 (LFA) Surface Water 11 47.39 153.59 Seawater 0 N/A N/A Reclaimed Water 3 7.50 9.65 ASR and 0 N/A N/A Reservoirs Total 16 65.19 167.04 Note: Estimated costs are construction costs only 31

  32. Water supply development projects Number of Quantity Water Estimated Cost Type Projects (mgd) ($M low range) Groundwater (IAS 2 2.88 0.79 and LFA) Stormwater/Surface 5 5.37 50.68 Water Reuse of RO 1 0.75 1.24 Concentrate Seawater 0 N/A N/A Reclaimed Water 56 86.44 169.89 Total 64 95.44 222.60 Note: Estimated costs are construction costs only 32

  33. WSP Planning Pr WSP Planning Process ocess WMDs - Update WSP every five years After GB Approval 6 Months – WMD Notifies PWS of projects in WSP 12 Months – PWS selects project(s) and informs WMD 18 Months – Facilities Work Plan adopted into Comp Plan Then Thereafter Annually Nov. 15 – PWS submit Annual Report 33

  34. Importance of collaboration • Meet needs of commercial, agricultural, environmental and urban uses • Meet needs of recreational and quality of life • Business and community leader engagement is vital • Working together to meet all the needs will ensure a vital economy 34

  35. Water Supply Plan Timeline Activity 2014 2015 2016 2017 Stakeholder Outreach Develop, Evaluate, and Revise Project Benefits Draft Water Supply Plan Resource Assessment Stakeholder Input on Draft Plan Finalize Water Supply Plan Implement Water Supply Plan 35

  36. How to submit comments • Go to: http://northfloridawater.com/watersupplyplan/draft.html • If you have several comments please use comment review form (excel spreadsheet) • Otherwise you can submit on the embedded form at the above web address or at: nfrwsp-comments@sjrwmd.com 36

  37. Questions? 37

Recommend


More recommend