wastes and waste derived products
play

wastes and waste derived products case studies V I K T R I A F E I - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Improvement of degraded soil by wastes and waste derived products case studies V I K T R I A F E I G L * , O R S O L Y A K L E B E R C Z * , V A U J A C Z K I * , E M E S E V A S Z I T A * , M N I K A M O L N R * , N I K O L E T


  1. Improvement of degraded soil by wastes and waste derived products – case studies V I K T Ó R I A F E I G L * , O R S O L Y A K L E B E R C Z * , É V A U J A C Z K I * , E M E S E V A S Z I T A * , M Ó N I K A M O L N Á R * , N I K O L E T T U Z I N G E R * * , K A T A L I N G R U I Z * W I T H T H E C O N T R I B U T I O N O F T H E ” S O I L U T I L ” , T H E ” B Á N Y A R E M ” A N D T H E ” T E R R A P R E T A ” P R O J E C T C O N S O R T I A *Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Bioengineering, Department of Applied Biotechnology and Food Science **Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Institute for Soil Sciences and Agricultural Chemistry, Centre for Agricultural Research

  2. Evaluation of wastes and their application for soil based on their risks and benefits Values and benefits  Nutrient and organic matter content, pH Hazard of  New, improved soil waste and the  Re-use of waste  Green areas: aesthetic, climatic, ecological risk of its application Value of the wastes and Hazards and risks Toxic substance content  benefit Radioactivity  of their Patogenes  utilization Natural dilution  Land use   Frequency of application Untreated degraded land 

  3. Case studies: wastes for soil improvement  No. 1. Remediation of mine waste with fly ash and other amendments  No. 2. Remediation of metal contaminated soil with fly ash  No. 3. Revegetation and rehabilitation: creation of a fertile topsoil layer from fly ash and organic wastes  No. 4. Soil substitute from red mud  No. 5. Acidic sandy soil improvement with biochar

  4. Mine waste Environ- dump Metal ore Case study No 1. mental effect mine waste to be treated Nagyvölgyi creek  Site: Gyöngyösoroszi mining site  Problem: acidic (pH=2.8), Combined chemical and Chemical Chemical Cd, Zn, Pb and As containing stabiliser stabiliser pytostabilisation mine waste on the surface for 40 years  Solution: combined chemical and phytostabilisation  Amendments: Field experiment fly ash, lime, iron grit  Plants: Fly ash + lime treatment grass mixture, broom corn, Fly ash sudan grass Untreated plot

  5. Effect of chemical stabilisation Leachate: Cd: 441 µg/l ( HQC : 5 µg/l)* → 0. 12 µg/l Zn: 89 079 µg/l ( HQC: 200 µg/l)* → 29.3 µg/l (Untreated mine waste, 2007 → Fly ash+lime+iron, 2009) Mine waste treated with fly ash Untreated mine waste and lime Grass: 0.16 mg/kg Cd (HQC=1 mg/kg)** 58 mg/kg Zn (HQC=100 mg/kg)** * B contamination level for underground water, 6/2009 (IV. 14.) KvVM- EüM -FVM joint decree ** Hungarian quality criteria for food and fodder, 44/2003. (IV.26.) FVM and 17/1999 . (VI. 16.) EüM decree

  6. Case study No 2.  Site: Gyöngyösoroszi Flooding in Mine waste mining site Gyöngyösoroszi in the Toka-creek  Problem: agricultural soil 3D Contour Plot (distribution of the zinc in the hobby garden) 18 contaminated with Cd and 16 14 Zn by flooding 12 10 8  Solution: combined 6 4 2000 2 chemical and Distance from 1500 1000 0 500 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 (ppm) Widht (m) Direction Toka-creek phytostabilisation Sudan grass on untreated (left) and fly ash  Amendment: treated (right) soil fly ash Cd: 3.00 mg/kg Cd: 0.902 mg/kg  Plant: grass mixture, Zn: 348 mg/kg Zn: 104 mg/kg broom corn, sudan grass, maize

  7. Case study No. 3.  Site: .A.S.A. Hungary Ltd. municipal landfill site at Gyál  Problem: steep ringwall with no vegetation – bad Barren ringwall aesthetic view, erosion of the municipal landfill  Solution: in situ waste mixing  Amendment: Eroded fly ash; wood ash; raw, ringwall digested and composted sewage sludge  Plant: grass mixture

  8. Long term effect of waste treatment (2.5 years)  One-time treatment, but improvement from year to year  Improvement in texture, nutrient-availability, biological activity  No toxic effect  Best option: organic+inorganic amendment together Field experiment Fertilizer Organic Inorganic Organic+ Grass on the organic + inorganic inorganic waste amended plot

  9. Experimental Case study No. 4. plots  Site: .A.S.A. Hungary Ltd. municipal landfill site at Gyál Plants grown  Problem: cheap and fertile on the waste cover material needed mixtures  Solution: soil substitute from waste Best combinations: o subsoil + 2% Ajka red mud  Wastes: + 10% green waste or compost  subsoil (construction waste) o subsoil + 20% red mud contaminated soil  red mud (Ajka)  red mud contaminated soil Soil substitute with ideal water balance, (removed after Ajka accident) available nutrient and organic matter  compost, green waste, saw dust content, active microflora,  Plant: grass mixture no toxic effect

  10. Case study No. 5. Experimental field plots  Site: Nyírlúgos , Biochar agricultural land  Problem: acidic (pH=4.5) sandy (85 w/w% sand) soil Maize in pot  Solution: biochar experiments amendment  Biochar from waste: Best options: o 1% biochar  Grain husks o 0.5% biochar + microbial soil inoculant  Paper fibre sludge Improved plant growth & productivity,  Pyrolysis: 500 ° C, 20 min higher pH, available K and P, water holding capacity,  Plant: maize more active microflora & soil as habitat

  11. Wastes are solution for degraded land! Thank you for your attention! E-mail: vfeigl@mail.bme.hu, mmolnar@mail.bme.hu More info: www.enfo.hu The experiments were carried out in the frame of the BÁNYAREM (GVOP 3.1.1-2004-05-0261/3.0), the MOKKA (NKFP-020-05 ) and the SOILUTIL (TECH_09-A4-2009-0129) Hungarian R&D projects, the TERRA PRETA (HU09-0029-A1-2013) Norway Grants project

Recommend


More recommend