washington state community and technical college
play

Washington State Community and Technical College Allocation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Washington State Community and Technical College Allocation Methodology Nick Lutes, Vice President for Administrative Services Grays Harbor College February 14, 2017 Building the Allocation of State appropriations Step 6.1 Compile Step 1


  1. Washington State Community and Technical College Allocation Methodology Nick Lutes, Vice President for Administrative Services Grays Harbor College February 14, 2017

  2. Building the Allocation of State appropriations Step 6.1 – Compile Step 1 – Set Gross District Allocation – Step 6.2 – Compile Funding level for Model Distribute Net Allocation District Allocation – Sum after Step 3 based on Allocation Step 6.1 and Step 2 Share of Step 5 Step 2 – Identify SAI Step 5 – Determine Step 6.3 – Compile Share & Allocate to weighted enrollment District Allocation – Sum Districts share for districts Step 6.2 and Step 3 Step 3 – Set Aside MOA - Final Allocation - (Leaves Net Allocation Step 4 – Set District for distribution to Enrollment Target (pre-stop/loss) enrollments in Step 6.1) 2

  3. New Model – STEP 1 – Set Gross Funding Level Identify Value of Total Appropriation Annual State $739.0 million Remove Provisos and Earmarks Priorities of the Legislature and ($178.6) million State Board Remove Administrative Functions, Ed Programs and Reserves State Board offices, Central IT ($46.4) million and state services $514.0 million 3

  4. New Model – STEP 2 – Identify Share for SAI Net Value of Appropriation to allocate after Step One Annual State $514.0 million Identify Share for distribution using SAI ($36.0) million 5 percent of total appropriation SAI to be distributed based on District Share of: 10% for Total 45% for Points per 45% for Total Points (less completions) Completion points Student $478.0 million 4

  5. New Model – STEP 3 – Set aside MOA Net Value of Appropriation to allocate after Step Two – SAI Annual State $478.0 million (5% SAI) Set aside Minimum Operating Allowance ($96.9) million $2.85 million per college Net value of Appropriation to be distributed for enrollments: $381.1 million 5

  6. Addresses Problem #4 New Model – STEP 4 – Set District Enrollment Target 1.Compare 3 2. Establish 3. Distribute 4. Compile 5. Use % share year averages: Pool of Surplus outcomes of from 4 to Target to enrollments to Enrollments in 1.A and 3 into distribute Actual rebase & Rebase Pool a single district system target enrollments overenrolled list of for district share enrollment new fiscal year targets A. If target Group A. greater than Subtract Determine actual then The system actual from Using share sum of the assign actual enrollment target and determined in district target for a (under sum for new year can 2.B distribute target enrolled) system be different pooled target values ( Pool ) from the enrollments previous three to year targets B. If Actual Group B. used in average overenrolled greater than Determine Determine districts and target then district % district share add to 1.B assign target share of District of total over (over total target Enrollment enrollments enrolled) Target set! 627

  7. New Model – STEP 5 – Determine Weighted Enrollment Share 2. Multiply FTEs in 3. Compile Weighted 1. Take district mission categories from Enrollment totals outcomes for Step 1.A by assigned weight to Four determined weighted A. Determine district value sum of weighted A. Distribute district mission enrollments. target by share of weighted category from previous year B. Establish system- Only Enrollments in wide total weighted Priority, as well as enrollments  Unweighted Basic Ed, will receive a weight  Weighted C. Determine district greater than 1.0  Basic Education share of weighted  Other Weighted enrollments. This share is the basis for the distribution of available funding from outcome of STEP THREE. 7

  8. New Model – STEP 6 – Compile District Allocation 4. Add Safeharbor 1. Distribute Funding 2. Add district (earmark and proviso level determined in distribution of SAI funding) STEP Three by final from STEP Two to district share from Enrollment Funding Enroll +SAI +MOA+SH STEP Five Enroll +SAI 93.7% of total 57.0% of total appropriation is appropriation is allocated after this allocated after this action action Enrollment Funding At this point the 3. Add MOA from STEP 52.0% of total district allocations are Three to Enroll + SAI complete and rebased. appropriation is Enroll +SAI +MOA Compared to old 70.0% of total allocated with method. Changes to appropriation is allocation due to this action. rebase subject to allocated after this stop/loss policies. action 8

  9. 9

  10. What can I do to help my college? • As the time rolls on and we use the new model, certain variables will be importation to watch, which will allow for predictions of state funding changes: • Enrollments • Enrollment levels and type of enrollments have enhanced meaning • Target changes due to over or under-enrollment • Mix of priority Enrollments • Funding based on performance is increasing… • …developing an understanding about services provided and student outcomes will be increasingly important. 10

Recommend


More recommend