value of transgenics weed management
play

Value of Transgenics: Weed Management Culpepper and Steckel Survey - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Value of Transgenics: Weed Management Culpepper and Steckel Survey Participants Jamshid Asigh Mike Marshall Tom Barber Donnie Miller Tom Baughman Mike Patterson Jason Bond Ken Smith Stanley Culpepper Larry Steckel Peter Dotray Daniel


  1. Value of Transgenics: Weed Management Culpepper and Steckel

  2. Survey Participants Jamshid Asigh Mike Marshall Tom Barber Donnie Miller Tom Baughman Mike Patterson Jason Bond Ken Smith Stanley Culpepper Larry Steckel Peter Dotray Daniel Stephenson Wayne Keeling Alan York Individuals represent 96% of the 2009 US cotton crop!

  3. Adoption of Herbicide-Resistant Cotton >99% 100% 93% 100% 100% 98% 96% >99% 91.5% 99% Source: 2009 Beltwide Weed Science Survey – Percent cotton planted to cotton with herbicide-resistant traits in 2009. USDA AM S 2009 crop estimates 94.75% transgenic.

  4. Confirmed Number of Herbicide-Resistant Weed Species in the Cotton Belt 18 8 14 8 8 0 9 3 2 4 12 8 4 4 5 4 5 Source: International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds (12/ 28/ 09)

  5. Herbicide-Resistant Weeds Challenging Cotton Growers Palmer amaranth Common waterhemp Horseweed Johnsongrass Ryegrass Ragweed – common and giant Resistance to glyphosate in all of the listed weeds is the primary issue as well as ALS resistance in several of the species.

  6. 2009 Cotton Acreage and Percent Acreage Infested with Herbicide-Resistant Weeds 380,000 340,000 (50%) 520,000 (100%) 30,000 (85%) (0%) 140,000 270,000 980,000 (75%) 4,917,000 (75%) (75%) (2%) 250,000 240,000 (30%) (0%) Source: National Cotton Council and Beltwide Weed Science S urvey

  7. 2009 Cotton Acreage and Percent Acreage Infested with Herbicide-Resistant Weeds Acres in survey: 8.1 mil (96% of US) US acres infested with resistance: 27% SE and MS acres infested with resistance: 68% 380,000 340,000 (50%) 520,000 (100%) 30,000 (85%) (0%) 140,000 270,000 980,000 (75%) 4,917,000 (75%) (75%) (2%) 250,000 240,000 (30%) (0%) Source: National Cotton Council and beltwide weed survey (12/ 28/ 09)

  8. All Weeds Are Not Created Equal

  9. Amaranthus palmeri 2009 N Carolina Tennessee Arkansas S Carolina Mississippi Georgia Alabama Louisiana

  10. Palmer amaranth Infestation Levels Little to No Infestations Significant Alabama Arkansas Louisiana Georgia Mississippi North Carolina New Mexico South Carolina Texas Tennessee {5,707,000 acres} {2,360,000}

  11. Has The Value of Glyphosate-Resistant Technology Changed for Areas With M inimal Impact by GR Palmer? 100 80 80% of acres have increased value 60 40 2% of acres 20 decreased in value $9/A increase 0 Wider window for Flex Development of glyphosate-resistant Germplasm weeds Improved weed control *Results are weighted on cotton acreage in states participating in the survey.

  12. Has The Value of Glyphosate-Resistant Technology Changed for Areas Impacted by GR Palmer? 100 80 60 45% of acres 40 decreased in value 0% of acres have 20 increased value $19.50/A decrease 0 Herbicides to combat resistance Cultivating Hand weeding *Results are weighted on cotton acreage in states participating in the survey.

  13. Value of Transgenics Are Changing Where GR Palmer is Present. Glyphosate 3 times Glyphosate 3 times 2006 2009 University of Georgia Ponder Farm

  14. Managing Severe GR Palmer Amaranth Populations in Dryland Cotton Production. Staple + Reflex + Direx PRE Roundup WMax + Parrlay POST Direx + MSMA Layby

  15. Impact of GR Palmer amaranth in Georgia counties with severe infestations.* Before (2004) After (2008) 60 40 45 % acres 26 20 20 5 0 0 0 0 0 Hand Herbicide Ignite Cultivation weeding Incorp. systems *Average of Macon, Taylor, Sumpter, Schley, and Dooly counties

  16. Has The Value of Ignite-Based Programs Changed for Areas With M inimal Impact by GR Palmer? 100 80 60 8% of acres have 40 increased value 0% of acres $5/A increase 20 decreased in value 0 Improved control of: Morningglory GR weeds *Results are weighted on cotton acreage in states participating in the survey.

  17. Has The Value of the Ignite-Based Programs Changed for Areas Impacted by GR Palmer? 100 80 60 53% of acres have 40 increased value 0% of acres 20 decreased in value $19.50/A increase 0 Best option for GR Palmer POST Only option for ALS+GR Palmer POST POST option for GR horseweed and ragweed Less cultivating and handweeding *Results are weighted on cotton acreage in states participating in the survey.

  18. Weathermax 88 oz Staple LX 10 oz

  19. GR Palmer Control in Dryland Conservation Tillage Prowl + Reflex PRE Prowl + Reflex PRE Roundup + Dual POST Ignite + Dual POST Diuron + MSMA PD Diuron + MSMA PD

  20. Giant Ragweed Control with Ignite or Roundup. TN, 2009. PowerMax 22 oz 2 leaf Ignite 29 oz 2 leaf PowerMax 22 oz 5 leaf Ignite 29 oz 5 leaf

  21. Is There M ore Value with Flex Cotton Compared to Traditional RR cotton? Focus is just on weed control and not germplasm!! No herbicide resistance: 10 of 10 states say there is increased value ($8 to 20/A): Topical applications easier, quicker, less expensive One sprayer to maintain Improved weed control Overtop options without crop damage

  22. Is There M ore Value with Flex Cotton Compared to Traditional RR cotton? Focus is just on weed control and not germplasm!! No herbicide resistance: 10 of 10 states say there is increased value ($8 to 20/A): Topical applications easier, quicker, less expensive One sprayer to maintain Improved weed control Overtop options without crop damage BUT this will promote more use and dependence on glyphosate and ALS herbicide chemistry which will exasperate the impact of herbicide resistant weeds.

  23. Role of pollen movement and gene-flow in the spread of herbicide resistance

  24. Potential Pollen M ovement 3000 3 ft plant height Dispersal distance (ft) 2500 6 ft plant height 2000 1500 1000 500 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 Wind speed (mph) Sosnoskie, 2009

  25. Number of Seed Produced per Plant. Glyphosate-Resistant Weeds in US. 500,000 450 K 400,000 300,000 309 K 200,000 230 K 100,000 28 K 250 0 Giant Johnson Horseweed Waterhemp Palmer ragweed -grass amaranth Ragweed = Harrison et al. 2001; johnsongrass = Warwick and Black (1983); horseweed = Regehr and Bazzaz (1979); waterhemp = Nordby and Hartzler (2004); Palmer amaranth = Macrae et al (2009).

  26. Is There M ore Value with Flex Cotton Compared to Traditional RR cotton? Focus is just on weed control and not germplasm!! Herbicide resistance present: 8 of 9 say no Paying more for technology fee with no benefits Herbicide programs extremely costly Residual herbicides at planting, during the season, and at layby Wider window for early POST application?????

  27. Prowl + Reflex PRE, WeatherMax + Dual POST, Direx + MSMA Layby POST 18 DAP POST 24 DAP

  28. Will Growers Continue to Rely on the Glyphosate-Resistant Cotton Technology? Areas without resistance: Yes, as long as the technology performs Yes, but very interested in alternatives Yes, but will use other modes of action to combat resistance development Areas WITH resistance: No better options. As options become available, they will be evaluated. Yes, but interest building in conventional and Liberty Link systems. Moving toward Ignite-based systems. If yields were equal, growers would adopt Ignite based programs rapidly!! YIELD IS STILL THE KEY DECIDING FACTOR

  29. With Yield and Quality Equal, How M any Acres Would Be Planted to Conventional Cultivars? 2,000,000 1,500,000 ~1,524,740 acres 1,000,000 500,000 ~417,945 acres 0 Predicted acres Current acres What would happen the second year after planting all the conventional acres???

  30. Future Technology: 2,4-D or Dicamba Resistant Cotton 2,4-D resistant 2,4-D sensitive cotton cotton

  31. Will There Be Value in 2,4-D or Dicamba Resistant Traits for Cotton Growers? 1. Tool for managing GR ragweed, horseweed, Palmer, morningglory, perennial weeds, winter annual weeds 2. No preplant interval for burndown 3. A new mode of action for in-crop control 4. Applications overtop of cotton 5. Price of herbicides are currently economical 6. Option to rotate with Roundup for resistance mgmt

  32. 12 DAT Ignite Ignite + 2,4-D 0.75 lb

  33. 12 DAT Ignite Ignite + dicamba 0.5 lb

  34. Are You Comfortable M aking 2,4-D or Dicamba In-Crop Weed M anagement Recommendations TODAY? 1. Fair 2. No 3. No 4. No 5. Comfortable with dicamba, not with 2,4-D 6. No 7. Absolutely not 8. No 9. Yes, but only in some locations 10. No way, not today

  35. Why Are Weed Scientists So Uncomfortable? 1.Physical drift, drift, drift (10 of 10 are concerned)

  36. Why Are Weed Scientists So Uncomfortable? 1.Physical drift, drift, drift (10 of 10 are concerned) 2. Tank contamination 3. Volatility 4. Don’t provide complete pigweed control 5. Concern over cost of technology 6. Potential development of resistance 7. Accidental application to non-resistant cultivars 8. Attempting to control weeds too large

  37. Palmer amaranth is a game changer!

  38. Palmer amaranth seedbank – it is the key! YEAR 1: 5 Palmer females escape Produce 2,000,000 seeds in cotton (50% germ) YEAR 2: Weed program = 99.9% control 1,000 plants per acre left at harvest 400 female plants/A 160,000,000 seeds produced in cotton (50% germ) YEAR 3: Weed program 99.9% control 80,000 plants per acre left at harvest 32,000 female plants/A = 1.28 X 10 10 seed/A

Recommend


More recommend