update
play

UPDATE Matt King 09/06/2015 Overview 2 Plan for paper simulation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 MOEDAL SIMULATION UPDATE Matt King 09/06/2015 Overview 2 Plan for paper simulation Overall plan Details Issues MoEDAL collaboration meeting Plan for talk 09/06/2015 Matthew King, IFIC Plan for paper simulation 3


  1. 1 MOEDAL SIMULATION UPDATE Matt King 09/06/2015

  2. Overview 2  Plan for paper simulation  Overall plan  Details  Issues  MoEDAL collaboration meeting  Plan for talk 09/06/2015 Matthew King, IFIC

  3. Plan for paper simulation 3  Parameterize efficiency over several model points:  First pass model points and production range:  Points:  m = 100GeV, 1000GeV, 3000GeV  q = 0.5, 1.0, 2.0  Production:  θ = 2.4  3.0 (MMT acceptance, wide coverage)  φ = -2.7  -0.5 (MMT acceptance, wide coverage)  KE = 0  1000GeV (feedback? ck?)  Parameterize efficiency for each point in terms of:  Ez  Y projection of θ , φ (at approximate MMT z position)  Run generation phase only for new models to get θ , φ , KE values  Obtain efficiency from parameterized graphs 09/06/2015 Matthew King, IFIC

  4. Plan for paper simulation 4  Parameterized efficiency tables:  Take a long time to create.  Do not take up much space.  Enable fast calculation of efficiency from models  Can generate several tables for different geometry variations  May allow for systematic estimation of error from geometry  May take of order a week to generate new set of tables from a new geometry  Geneva batch system availability is variable  Grid may be better, but have had problems trying to get it to work 09/06/2015 Matthew King, IFIC

  5. Issues 5  Code for generation of efficiency tables is already in place  Have initial testing tables (1M events) ready  Will require a set of “final” geometries to actually produce results  Currently writing new nTuple writer algorithm for Gauss Generation phase  Original plan was to run, but immediately kill Simulation phase  Slow, simulation still needs to be set up and started. Messy.  Instead, run only the Generation phase  MonopoleTupleAlg is part of the SimMonitor Gaudi chain, never gets called  New tool (GenTupleAlg) sits in the GenMonitor chain and outputs generator results  Cannot simply copy MonopoleTupleAlg code. “ StoreGate ” classes used are different between Sim and Gen.  Looking into using Gauss built in Ntuple output. This is the official LHCb method, but could never make it work before. 09/06/2015 Matthew King, IFIC

  6. MoEDAL collaboration talk 6  We were in very early stages for the talk last year https://indico.cern.ch/event/320391/contribution/5/material/slides/1.pdf  A reminder of some advances for software framework alone:  Proper infrastructure: svn, batch system, CernVM image  Addressed problems arising from “Magnetic field drift”  Fixed memory usage problems, allowing for longer simulations  Removal of non-monopoles from Simulation phase, vastly speeding up process  LHE based generation as well as improved particle gun  Far fuller understanding of the Geant4 dE/dx calculation  Implementation of MMT/NTD hit generation in Geant4  MMT efficiency calculation  (Identified LHCb Random Number Generator issue) 09/06/2015 Matthew King, IFIC

  7. MoEDAL collaboration talk 7  Basic idea:  Outline developments made, want to demonstrate that real progress has been made.  In more detail:  G4 dE/dx equation research  dE/dx eqn is the main thing people are conceptually interested in. It’s validity is essential, low beta model concerns may come up.  MMT efficiency calculations and current results  This is the main tool we will use for the paper, everyone must understand what the situation is.  Plan for paper:  Similar to previous slides in this document, but with more detail and explanation  Estimation of Geometry errors: should this be in mine or Rafal’s talk? 09/06/2015 Matthew King, IFIC

Recommend


More recommend