unmanned air systems issues and challenges to c4i incose
play

Unmanned Air Systems Issues and Challenges to C4I INCOSE San Diego - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Program Executive Office Command, Control, Communications, Computers and Intelligence (PEO C4I) Unmanned Air Systems Issues and Challenges to C4I INCOSE San Diego 30 Oct 2010 CAPT John Robey Air Sea Integration (PMW 750) 619-524-7560


  1. Program Executive Office Command, Control, Communications, Computers and Intelligence (PEO C4I) Unmanned Air Systems – Issues and Challenges to C4I INCOSE San Diego 30 Oct 2010 CAPT John Robey Air Sea Integration (PMW 750) 619-524-7560 John.l.robey@navy.mil Statement A: Approved for public release; Distribution is unlimited. Information Dominance Anytime, Anywhere… PEOC4I.NAVY.MIL

  2. CNO's Unifying Vision and Guiding Principles Vision - "Pioneer, field and employ game-changing capabilities to ensure Information Dominance over adversaries and Decision Superiority for commanders, operational forces and the nation"  • First Principles Include:  Emphasize UAS/RPV and autonomous  Every platform is a sensor platforms  Every sensor is networked  UAS's increasingly sea-based  Build a little; test a lot  One operator controls multiple platforms  Spiral development/acquisition  Data discoverable and accessible  Plug-n-play sensor payloads  Missions drive requirements  Reduce afloat/airborne manning  Commonality in interfaces, data links  Transition to remoted, automated and control stations  Every shooter capable of using target  Collectors dynamically tasked data derived from any sensor Statement A: Approved for public release; Distribution is unlimited. 2

  3. UAS Family of Systems 3 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; Distribution is unlimited. #09-983

  4. BAMS UAS OV-1 Narrowband Global Wideband SATCOM Positioning SATCOM System UA Maritime Forces MOB Joint Navy HQ(MOC)/ MCS Allied/Coalition Battle FOB Management Nodes EO/IR MCS Maritime Forces Teleport Radar, ESM & AIS Airspace Control Authority BAMS Payload Data Airspace Communications Joint Allied/ BAMS Air Vehicle C2 Airborne Communications Relay Coalition Defense Info System Network/Global Info Grid BAMS UAS Nodes (UA, MOB/FOB MCS) Exploitation Sites 4 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; Distribution is unlimited. #09-983

  5. Managing the Processing, Exploitation and Dissemination (PED) of Data Sensor data from UA Teleport Sensor data from UA BAMS UA Wideband SATCOM Worldwide CDL / Link-16 Main Operating Base (MOB) MPRA DCGS-N Afloat Mission CSG/ESG DISA Nodes Control First Pass GIG POP System Analysis from (MCS) MCS GCCS-M, AIS, Chat, VoIP DCGS-N Enterprise SIPRNET Node Exploitation Sites Sensor data to Exploitation Sites (e.g. NMIC, MOC/MIOCs, NGA, DCGS FoS, FIOC) DCGS Family of Systems (Air Force, Army, Marines, SOF, DCGS-IC) 5 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; Distribution is unlimited. #09-1061

  6. Exponential Data Growth: Enabler & Challenge! (From MIEA Study) 10 24 10 21 Max of 50 Mbps Theater Data Stream (2006): per channel ~270 TB of NTM data / year Current single mode fiber 10 18 carries 960 Gpbs Capability Gap 10 15 UUVs FIRESCOUT VTUAV DATA 10 12 GIG Data Capacity (Services, Transport & Storage) 2000 2005 2010 2015 & Beyond Statement A: Approved for public release; Distribution is unlimited. 6 MIEA Review

  7. Navy Data Strategy Challenge (from PEO C4I ISR Data Study - MITRE) Data Transmission Collection Data Decisions Decisions -Should we collect? -Send all of it? -Which sensors? -Compress it? -Stream it? -When/where to collect? -Just send a metadata -Where to process? -When to transmit ? synopsis? -Where to store? -Adjust Quality of Service? Enterprise/Cloud Data Decisions -Data center consolidation? -Degree of distributed processing? Systems Data Decisions -“Big Data” storage and - Analyze it? processing standards? -“Mark it up” (i.e., metadata)? -Time to live? -Store it? Where and for how long? Searchable? -Data format Tactical Data Decisions -Distribute it? How and which systems need it? standardization? -Analyze it? Is Expertise available? -Which system becomes “authoritative?” -Store it? How long? Capacity? -How to aggregate different results? -Transmit it? How? Capacity? -How to track provenance? Who has -Throw it out? touched it? -How to “mark it up?” -Throw it out? Why collect it and send it to begin with? Each decision is an opportunity to improve the end-to-end mission capability and streamline the OODA* Loop *Observe, Orient, Decide, Act (OODA) Statement A: Approved for public release; Distribution is unlimited. 7

  8. Summary • Proliferation of UASs (and their data) pose a significant challenge to Navy C4I architectures and TTPs • Data Strategies and ISR CONOPS are immature • Acquisition requirements and ownership of data processing, exploitation and dissemination (PED) are unclear – Getting the right data to the right customer at the right time – Manpower - who does what and where – Bandwidth – how much is enough, what needs to be sent and to whom – Automation / Data Fusion – turning data into information • Disciplined Systems Engineering and requirements derivation across SYSCOMs and acquisition programs is critical Statement A: Approved for public release; Distribution is unlimited. 8

Recommend


More recommend