university of tasmania
play

University of Tasmania Travel Behaviour Survey 2017 SUMMARY OF - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

University of Tasmania Travel Behaviour Survey 2017 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Anna Lyth Corey Peterson & Kamal Singh RED Sustainability Consultants Commercial Services & Development, University of Tasmania About the University of Tasmania


  1. University of Tasmania Travel Behaviour Survey 2017 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Anna Lyth Corey Peterson & Kamal Singh RED Sustainability Consultants Commercial Services & Development, University of Tasmania

  2. About the University of Tasmania Travel Behaviour Surveys  UTAS Travel Behaviour Survey (TBS) initiated in 2012  Three datasets: 2013, 2015, 2017  What the UTAS TBS provides: tracks UTAS staff and student travel behaviour associated with  university business (work and study land based) data for all campuses in all regions in which UTAS has operations  (Tasmania and NSW) informs planning and performance indicators that underpin the  University’s sustainable transport strategies databases for further in-depth research (students/academic use) 

  3. Changing transport planning backdrop 40000 Off-campus� (online/remote) 35000 On� Campus� � � � � � 30000  Reduced proportion of student enrolments as ‘ on- enrolments� (in� some� capacity) 25000 campus’ despite a significant increase in enrolments 20000 Student� 15000 10000 5000  Increase in share of ‘on -campus ’ international 0 students (particularly Hobart and Launceston) Year� 2013 Year� 2016 Source:UTAS� student� enrolments� March,� and� UTAS�Statistical� Snapshot� data  Dispersal of students and staff across Hobart CBD facilities – to continue into future with UTAS expansion programs in Launceston, Hobart and Burnie city centres

  4. Working internally and with external partners - Improvements implemented since 2015 Tasmanian public transport service improvements:  higher frequency/through-service bus routes in Launceston and  Hobart high frequency bus services linking Launceston campuses to CBD  Infrastructure upgrades:  >250 bicycle parking, lockers/hubs, end-of-trip facilities  bus shelter installations/upgrades – Newnham, Inveresk, West Park, Sandy Bay  >25 more motorcycle/scooter parking spaces  availability of car pool parking permits and dedicated spaces  Videoconference Improvement Program (VCIP)  Decide Your Ride online videos and maps informing safest  bicycle routes Increase in parking permit costs 

  5. Method, response, confidence  2 online surveys – staff and 3000 students (similar questions) 2500 2000 1500  2671 responses overall (2017) 1000 500 0 Responses� (Yr� 2017)  90-95% confidence levels (high) Students 1976 Staff 695  Margin of error less than3%

  6. Results

  7. Journey to work and study  1 in 3 respondents reported their journeys to work or study at the University as multi-modal  Top two staff multi-modal  Top two student multi-modal journey types to university, 2017 journey types to university, 2017

  8. Students - Primary mode to study Change over time and by campus (2017) Students – All UTAS Students – by campus 2017 35.9 35.9 100% other 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 100 taxi/Uber other 90% 5.5 5.3 6.3 bicycle� (incl.� electric� bicycle) taxi/Uber 90 walk/run bicycle� (incl.� electric� bicycle) 80% 27.1 bus/train� 80 walk/run 30.2 31.0 70% motorcycle/scooter bus/train� 70 car� as� a� passenger motorcycle/scooter 60% % Share� drove� car� - multiple� occupants car� as� a� passenger 60 12.3 16.6 drove� car� - sole 24.0 drove� car� - multiple� occupants 50% Mode� 50 drove� car� - sole 0.9 0.9 7.4 0.8 40% 8.0 40 6.0 5.9 5.6 5.7 30% 30 20% 20 35.9 32.7 30.7 10% 10 0% 0 Year� 2013 Year� 2015 Year� 2017 Sandy� Bay Hobart� CBD Newnham Inveresk CC� &� RCS Sydney

  9. Primary mode change over time Students – south Students – north 0.3 0.2 0.0 1.6 0.7 0.2 100 100 0.1 other other 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 5.6 5.9 4.0 6.1 3.2 8.8 taxi/Uber taxi/Uber 90 90 bicycle� (incl.� electric� bicycle) bicycle� (incl.� electric� bicycle) walk/run walk/run 80 80 28.8 30.3 33.2 32.8 35.4 29.2 bus bus 70 70 motorcycle/scooter motorcycle/scooter car� as� a� passenger car� as� a� passenger 60 60 % 5.3 share� 9.6 drove� car� - multiple� occupants % drove� car� - multiple� occupants 0.7 share� 15.7 5.3 20.0 14.8 0.7 26.8 drove� car� - sole drove� car� - sole 50 50 Mode� 6.8 5.5 Mode� 0.0 1.0 2.1 1.1 6.2 8.1 40 40 7.4 8.1 1.0 6.2 5.6 5.5 30 30 4.9 44.9 20 20 38.6 35.4 31.0 28.4 26.3 10 10 0 0 Year� 2013 Year� 2015 Year� 2017 Year� 2013 Year� 2015 Year� 2017

  10. Primary mode change over time Students – Sandy Bay Students – Hobart CBD 0.3 1.2 0.0 0.7 0.6 0.0 100 100 other 0.1 0.2 0.0 other 0.0 0.2 0.0 4.3 5.9 4.9 6.7 9.7 8.4 taxi/Uber taxi/Uber 90 90 bicycle� (incl.� electric� bicycle) bicycle� (incl.� electric� bicycle) 24.9 walk/run walk/run 80 80 29.6 28.8 34.0 bus bus 31.4 37.0 70 motorcycle/scooter 70 motorcycle/scooter car� as� a� passenger car� as� a� passenger % 60 60 share� drove� car� - multiple� occupants drove� car� - multiple� occupants 14.3 28.2 19.2 drove� car� - sole drove� car� - sole 16.2 50 50 � % Mode� 1.7 share� 23.6 1.6 7.9 1.2 1.4 23.8 40 40 7.7 Mode� 6.7 9.8 6.4 1.2 4.9 5.2 0.0 30 4.2 30 9.1 5.3 3.7 4.8 20 20 33.4 31.4 29.4 28.2 21.3 10 10 19.4 0 0 Year� 2013 Year� 2015 Year� 2017 Year� 2013 Year� 2015 Year� 2017

  11. Primary mode change over time Students – Cradle Coast Students – Sydney 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 100% 100 0.0 0.0 0.0 other 2.7 0.0 6.9 0.0 1.6 0.0 other 10.7 6.8 taxi/Uber 14.6 12.2 taxi/Uber 90% 90 bicycle� (incl.� electric� bicycle) 13.8 bicycle� (incl.� electric� bicycle) 8.4 3.0 0.0 0.0 walk/run 80% walk/run 80 6.0 12.5 12.4 bus/train bus 0.0 70% 19.0 70 motorcycle/scooter motorcycle/scooter 14.4 8.3 42.9 4.3 car� as� a� passenger car� as� a� passenger 60% share� 8.3 60 % 1.7 drove� car� - multiple� occupants share� 3.4 drove� car� - multiple� occupants drove� car� - sole 8.6 drove� car� - sole Mode� 50% 50 Mode� 3.6 0.0 3.6 40% 40 64.9 62.1 30% 30 56.3 46.6 20% 39.3 20 no� data 10% 10 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 Year� 2013 Year� 2015 Year� 2017 Year� 2013 Year� 2015 Year� 2017 Note: Year-to-year comparisons are to be taken with caution for these regions as sample sizes are small <100. Instead the data provides an indication of the mode share.

  12. Staff- Primary mode to work change over time and by campus (2017) Staff – All UTAS Staff – by campus 2017 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 100% 100 0.0 other 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.4 0.4 0.4 9.0 10.2 11.8 8.1 8.9 10.5 11.2 taxi/Uber 14.4 other 90% 90 0.0 bicycle� (incl.� electric� bicycle) 6.3 4.2 10.3 6.2 taxi/Uber 2.1 12.0 18.0 4.3 walk/run 80% 11.0 4.2 80 bicycle� (incl.� electric� bicycle) 6.6 3.4 2.0 0.0 bus 3.9 1.2 4.7 1.6 0.0 walk/run 5.0 1.0 13.7 4.8 70% motorcycle/scooter 70 5.7 9.0 14.4 bus/train� car� as� a� passenger 19.5 14.5 0.8 motorcycle/scooter 60% 16.0 9.0 60 12.7 % drove� car� - multiple� occupants share� 7.6 car� as� a� passenger drove� car� - sole 50% 50 drove� car� - multiple� occupants Mode� 11.9 88.2 drove� car� - sole 40% 40 64.2 30% 30 55.0 53.9 56.1 53.9 53.1 20% 39.8 20 10% 10 0% 0 Sandy� Bay Hobart� CBD Newnham Inveresk� &� LCS CC� &� RCS Year� 2013 Year� 2015 Year� 2017

  13. Primary mode change over time Staff – south Staff – north 1.5 1.1 0.0 100 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.5 100 0.3 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.9 other other 11.7 6.8 8.4 9.2 7.9 10.3 90 taxi/Uber taxi/Uber 4.4 90 1.7 1.9 7.8 7.6 bicycle� (incl.� electric� bicycle) bicycle� (incl.� electric� bicycle) 12.8 1.4 3.7 13.8 4.7 80 2.3 1.9 walk/run walk/run 80 7.3 4.7 4.0 0.7 4.1 bus 11.1 bus 5.7 1.6 1.2 70 5.0 5.1 1.3 10.2 motorcycle/scooter 70 13.1 motorcycle/scooter 6.3 car� as� a� passenger car� as� a� passenger 60 15.8 16.7 drove� car� - multiple� occupants 60 % drove� car� - multiple� occupants share� % 14.0 share� drove� car� - sole drove� car� - sole 50 50 Mode� Mode� 40 40 69.7 66.3 30 63.6 30 50.6 50.1 48.2 20 20 10 10 0 0 Year� 2013 Year� 2015 Year� 2017 Year� 2013 Year� 2015 Year� 2017

Recommend


More recommend