Ultrafine Particles and Freeways Yifang Zhu , Ph.D. Assistant - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ultrafine particles and freeways
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Ultrafine Particles and Freeways Yifang Zhu , Ph.D. Assistant - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Ultrafine Particles and Freeways Yifang Zhu , Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Environmental Engineering Texas A&M University Kingsville Email: yzhu@even.tamuk.edu yifang.zhu@tamuk.edu 1 Comparison of PM10, PM2.5, and Ultrafine


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Ultrafine Particles and Freeways

Yifang Zhu , Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Environmental Engineering Texas A&M University –Kingsville Email: yzhu@even.tamuk.edu yifang.zhu@tamuk.edu

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Comparison of PM10, PM2.5, and Ultrafine PM

PM10 (10 µm) PM2.5 (2.5 µm) Ultrafine PM (0.1 µm)

Human Hair (60 µm diameter)

PM2.5 (2.5 µm) PM10 (10 µm)

Relative size of particles

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Atmospheric Aerosols: Particulate Matter (PM) Size Distribution

Number Distribution Mass Distribution

Ultrafine Particles PM2.5 PM10

Source: Hinds 1999

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Respiratory Deposition, fraction 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Particle Diameter (nm)

1 10 100 1000 10000

Number Weighted Mass Weighted Head Airways Tracheobronchial Alveolar

Particle Regional Deposition for Light Exercise

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Pathways of Particle Translocation Within and Outside Respiratory Tract

Translocation of UFP from NP and TB region along sensory neurons to CNS (neurodegeneration)

  • Translocation of UFP to

interstitium, capillaries, heart

  • Uptake by endothelium; platelets
  • Activation/interaction of endothelial

cells, platelets and leukocytes Alveolar inflammation

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Publications Address Ultrafine Particles

Pollution Health Toxcicity Cardiovascula Asthma

Number of Publications

100 200 300 400 500 Before 1996 1996-2005

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

I-405 Freeway

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Sampling Site

Day Night

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

INSTRUMENTS

Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer (SMPS): Particle Size Distribution (6-300 nm) Condensation Particle Counter (CPC): Total Particle Number Concentration Q-Trak: CO, CO2, Temp, Rh Portable Aethelometer: EC Dust Trak: Real time PM10, PM2.5 Weather Wizard III: Wind speed and direction

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Experimental Setup: 2001 Daytime

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Traffic Effect: Total Particle Number Concentration & Traffic Density

Zhu et al., 2002a

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

 Normal Traffic  Traffic Slowdown

Zhu et al., 2002a

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

RESULTS: Change in Ultrafine Particle Size Distribution with Increasing Distance Day

Zhu et al., 2002a

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

RESULTS: Number Concentration for Different Size Ranges

  • Vs. Increasing Distance from Freeway 405.

Zhu et al., 2002a

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

RESULTS: Relative Particle Number, Mass, Black Carbon, CO Concentration, Vs. Downwind Distance from Freeway 405.

Zhu et al., 2002a

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Experimental Setup: 2004 Nighttime

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Distance from the freeway (m)

500 400 300 200 100 100 200 300 400 500

Total Particle Number Concentration (cm-3)

0.0 2.0e+4 4.0e+4 6.0e+4 8.0e+4 1.0e+5 1.2e+5 1.4e+5 1.6e+5 1.8e+5 2.0e+5 Freeway 405 Eastern Side LA National Cemetery Western Side VA Facility Daytime Dominant Wind

RESULTS: Decay of Total Particle Number Concentration

Nighttime Dominant Wind

Nighttime Dominant Wind

Daily exposure to Ultrafine Particles: 3 folds of difference between the two cases

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Distance from the freeway (m)

500 400 300 200 100 100 200 300 400 500

Total Particle Number Concentration (cm-3)

0.0 2.0e+4 4.0e+4 6.0e+4 8.0e+4 1.0e+5 1.2e+5 1.4e+5 1.6e+5 1.8e+5 2.0e+5 Freeway 405 Eastern Side LA National Cemetery Western Side VA Facility Daytime Dominant Wind

RESULTS: Decay of Total Particle Number Concentration

Nighttime Dominant Wind

Nighttime Dominant Wind

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

RESULTS: Temperature Effect

Temperature ( oC )

10 20 30 40

Particle Number Concentration/vehicle (cm-3)

0.0 2.0e+4 4.0e+4 6.0e+4 8.0e+4 1.0e+5 1.2e+5 405 Fwy Summer 405 Fwy Winter 405 Fwy Night Time

Y=7.35e4-1.74e3X R2=0.98 Y=5.17e3+1.17e5exp(-0.071X) R2=0.99

Zhu et al, 2006

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Indoor Study

 Sampling Site and Dominant Wind

Zhu et al., 2005

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

I-405 Freeway

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

RESULTS: Effect of distance from freeways

 Apartment 1  Apartment 2

Zhu et al., 2005

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

RESULTS: Effect of Ventilation Conditions on Size Segregated I/O Ratios

Zhu et al., 2005

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

RESULTS: Effect of Ventilation Conditions on Size Segregated I/O Ratios

Zhu et al., 2005

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

RESULTS: Effect of Ventilation Conditions on Size Segregated I/O Ratios

Zhu et al., 2005

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

In-Cabin Study

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

Outdoor and In-Cabin Size Distribution Time Series

Zhu et al., 2007

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

Average Outdoor UFP Distribution on Different Freeways

Zhu et al., 2007

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

Average In-Cabin UFP Distribution on Different Freeways

Zhu et al., 2007

slide-33
SLIDE 33

33

Similar I/O Ratio Profiles on Different Freeways

Zhu et al., 2007

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

Effect of Ventilation Conditions on I/O Profiles

Zhu et al., 2007

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

TAKE HOME MESSAGES

  • Because of dilution (and coagulation/condensation)

ultrafine particles behave like a local source.

  • Central station monitoring not useful for estimating

dose

  • 1 hr on freeway exceeds 23 hrs away from freeway.
  • Newer vehicles with recirculation on helps to

reduce in-cabin ultrafine particle exposure.

slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

  • Most ultrafine particles formed after exhaust

leaves the tailpipe

  • Cooling and dilution both occurring
  • Cooling increases nucleation
  • Dilution decreases nucleation
  • Complex physical process
  • Sensitive to environmental conditions

TAKE HOME MESSAGES

slide-37
SLIDE 37

37

  • Assessing Children’s Exposure to Ultrafine Particles from

Vehicular Emissions Objective: To identify hot spots in South Texas where school children are likely to be exposed to high levels of UFPs and develop simple models to estimate children’s exposure to UFPs from vehicular emissions.

  • Using In-Situ Observations to Quantify Emissions from

Prescribed Fires in two Grassland-Pine Ecosystems Objective: To directly quantify UFP emissions from prescribed fires on DoD managed grassland and grass-shrub type ecosystems with different fuel types and fuel loadings.

FUTURE WORD

slide-38
SLIDE 38

38

FUTURE WORD

Master and Ph.D. Students will be Financially Supported in Part by National Science Foundation (NSF) sponsored Center for Research Excellence in Science and Technology (CREST)- Research in Environmental Sustainability for Semiarid Coastal Areas (RESSACA) at Environmental Engineering Department at Texas A&M University-Kingsville.