truckee river flood management authority locally
play

Truckee River Flood Management Authority Locally Preferred Plan - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Truckee River Flood Management Authority Locally Preferred Plan Discussion of Project Elements Cost Estimate Chronology of Project Cost Development In December 2012 The USACE completed MCACES for the National Economic Development Plan


  1. Truckee River Flood Management Authority Locally Preferred Plan Discussion of Project Elements Cost Estimate

  2. Chronology of Project Cost Development • In December 2012 The USACE completed MCACES for the National Economic Development Plan (2012 NED). • In April of 2013 HDR developed MCACES using quantities developed for the Local Preferred Plan (2013 LPP) and, except for a few exceptions, used the contingencies from the 2012 NED. • In February 2017 HDR developed a Phasing Plan based on the 2013 LPP. During this effort the project costs were escalated from 2013 costs to 2016 cost. • In December 2013 the USACE updated the cost estimate for 2012 NED (Certification date of December 2013). – (2013 NED)

  3. Basis for Contingencies for 2013 LPP • The contingencies were largely obtained from 2012 NED.

  4. Summary of 2013 LPP Contingencies (Using 2012 NED Contingencies)

  5. The USACE 2012 NED Contingencies Were Revised Using a Risk Based Approach – 2013 NED

  6. Summary of 2013 NED Contingencies

  7. Comparison of Contingencies between USACE 2013 NED, 2012 NED, and 2013 LPP Contingency % Feature USACE 2012 NED HDR 2013 LPP USACE 2013 NED 01 39.1 39.1 31.3* Lands and Damages 02 37.9 37.9 27.12* Relocations 06 37.9 37.9 N/A Fish & Wildlife 09 37.9 37.9 27 Channels & Canals 11 37.9 37.9 27 Levees & Flood Walls 14 37.9 68.06 27 Recreation 16 37.9 38 27 Bank Stabilization 18 33.5 33.5 23 Cultural Resources 30 11.2 11.2 27 Plan/Engineering/Design 31 37.9 37.9 27 Construction Management *Weighted Avg.

  8. 2013 LPP Project Elements Cost Summary Using 2012 NED CNTG.

  9. 2013 LPP Project Elements Cost Summary Using 2013 NED CNTG.

  10. Comparison of Totals in 2018 dollars

  11. Questions Regarding Project Elements Cost Estimate Spreadsheet 1. Are contingency costs also added on top of land costs? 2. We have been told that contingency costs are 35%, but the spreadsheet shows 37.9%. That is a difference of $5.7M 3. Are the costs for the NTD included in our estimate? 4. There is almost $19M for “Habitat and Feeding” that is not in the Yellow Book. What is this line item? 5. There is $4.7M for “McCarran Levee/UNR (S) that is not in the Yellow Book. What is this line item? 6. Are the completed projects eligible for Army Corps funding? To put it another way, could we apply for part of that $180M now? 7. Could we be provided with an overlay of the 1997 flood for downtown Reno?

  12. 1. Are contingency costs also added on top of land costs? • Yes

  13. 2. We have been told that contingency costs are 35%, but the spreadsheet shows 37.9% • The original contingency goal Contingency % Feature was 35%, but USACE 2012 NED HDR 2013 LPP USACE 2013 NED • A contingency of 01 39.1 39.1 31.3* Lands and Damages 37.9% was used 02 37.9 37.9 27.12* Relocations for the 2013 LPP 06 37.9 37.9 N/A Fish & Wildlife to maintain 09 37.9 37.9 27 Channels & Canals consistency with 11 37.9 37.9 27 Levees & Flood Walls the USACE 14 37.9 68.06 27 Recreation 16 37.9 38 27 Bank Stabilization • Then the USACE 18 33.5 33.5 23 Cultural Resources updated the NED 30 11.2 11.2 27 Plan/Engineering/Design in 2013 to a 31 37.9 37.9 27 Construction Management Contingency of *Weighted Avg. 27%

  14. 3. Are the costs for the North Truckee Drain included in our estimate? The costs for the North Truckee Drain was included in 2013 LPP Cost Estimate as an estimated cost as it had not been constructed at the time of the report.

  15. 3. Continued Then for the Phasing Plan the NTD cost was updated with the actual bid construction cost and treated as a sunk cost or cost to date.

  16. 4. There is almost $19M for "Habitat and Feeding" that is not in the Yellow Book. • This is the necessary work for habitat mitigation/restoration.

  17. 5. There is $4.7M for "McCarran Levee/UNR (S) that is not in the Yellow Book. This Levee Reach on Right Bank was required for Hydraulic Mitigation, a cost was developed in 2016 and unit costs from 2013 LPP were applied.

  18. 6. Are the completed projects eligible for Army Corps funding? To put it another way, could we apply for part of that $180M now? 7. Could we be provided with an overlay of the 1997 flood for downtown Reno?

  19. QUESTIONS?

  20. Current Project Phasing Baseline Surveys Glendale to Rock, Habitat Phase 5 Facilities, Draft Environmental Impact Bank Stabilization Statement Rock to McCarran, Purina to Final Environmental Impact Phase 6 Existing NTD, Bank Initial Tasks Statement Stabilization Environmental Permitting Truckee Meadows Habitat Phase 7 Facilities 2 Truckee Meadows Reach Center Street Bridge, Truckee Phase 8 Meadows Recreation Facilities Pedestrian Bridge (Wells Avenue), Phase 1 Bank Stabilization, Phase 9 Sierra Street Bridge Non-voluntary Home Elevation -Flood Risk Mitigation New Downtown Floodwalls, Phase 10 Booth Street Bridge, Pedestrian Bridges Phase 2 Lake Street Bridge Pump Stations, Existing Benching at and below Vista, Phase 3 Phase 11 Downtown Floodwall Bank Stabilization Replacement McCarran to Purina (North & Phase 4 South), Existing NTD to end of Floodwall, Bank Stabilization

  21. 2013 LPP Project Elements Cost Summary Using 2013 NED CNTG.

  22. 2013 LPP Project Elements Cost Summary Using 2012 NED CNTG.

  23. Comparison of Totals in 2018 dollars

Recommend


More recommend