toward the implementation of t d th i l t ti f the
play

Toward the Implementation of T d th I l t ti f the National - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Toward the Implementation of T d th I l t ti f the National Violent Death Reporting System in Arizona Charles M. Katz Center for Violence Prevention & Community Safety Center for Violence Prevention & Community Safety


  1. Toward the Implementation of T d th I l t ti f the National Violent Death Reporting System in Arizona � Charles M. Katz � Center for Violence Prevention & Community Safety Center for Violence Prevention & Community Safety � ckatz@asu.edu

  2. History of the NVDRS: In Brief � 1999: six foundation provide support for a National Violent Death Injury Statistics System (NVISS). � 2000: 12 sites implement NVISS (primarily universities) universities) � 2000: Harvard and Joyce Foundation call for a publically funded program p y p g � 2000: CDC begins strategic planning � 2002: CDC funds 6/17 who apply � 2003: CDC funds 7/16 who apply � Currently there are 17 funded states

  3. NVDRS states as of 2010

  4. NVDRS Definition of a Violent Death: ICD-10 Codes ICD 10 Codes � Cause of death must be coded as: Cause o deat ust be coded as � Intentional self-harm x60-84, Y87.0 � Assault x85-99, Y00-09, Y87.1 � Undetermined intent Y10-34, Y87.2, Y89.9 � Unintentional firearm W32-34, Y86 (guns) � Legal intervention Y35.0-Y35.7 (except Y35.5), Y89.0 � Terrorism Terrorism U01 U03 U02 U01, U03, U02

  5. Sampling frame � Residents and occurant deaths � Resident based sample provides for population es de t based sa p e p o des o popu at o based rates. � Occurant deaths allow for a focus of where violence is occurring. i l i i � If a victim lives in one state and dies in another � If a victim lives in one state and dies in another, and both states participate in the NVDRS, the occurant state is responsible for collecting the d t data.

  6. Data sources � Required: � Death certificates eat ce t cates � Police reports � Medical examiner/coroner reports � Elective � Crime lab reports � Child fatality review team data � Supplemental homicide report data � Supplemental homicide report data � Hospital data � ATF trace data on guns ATF trace data on guns

  7. Examples of the types of data collected collected � Incident narrative (who, when, where, why, how) � Person type e so type � Name and address � Age, sex, ethnicity, education, veteran, occupation � When and where (injury/death) � Manner and cause of death � M d f d th � Toxicology and autopsy � Wounds Wounds � Victim/suspect relationship � History of victim abuse y � Weapon type

  8. Data � Incident based � Sorted by source of data So ted by sou ce o data � Elements are not unique (same information from more than one sources) � Secure facility, HIPPA guidelines � Confidentiality protocols via MOU

  9. Who is on board so far: Local police p � Phoenix � Sierra Vista � Tucson � Payson � Scottsdale Scottsdale � Florence � Glendale � Green Valley � Prescott � Cottonwood � Peoria Peoria � Marana � Kingman � Globe � Flagstaff � Oro Valley � Lake Havasu City � Lake Havasu City � Safford � Apache Junction � Sedona � Avondale � Maricopa � Buckeye � Buckeye � Show Low � Surprise � Quartzsite � Prescott Valley � Arivaca � Goodyear � Goodyear � Parker � Nogales � Holbrook

  10. Who is on board so far: County Medical Examiners Medical Examiners Sheriff’s Departments Sheriff s Departments � Maricopa County � Pima County � Pima County � Pinal County � Pinal County � Coconino County � Navaho County Navaho County � Graham County � Santa Cruz County � Yavapai County Ya apai Co nt � Apache County

Recommend


More recommend