the semiclassical method in interacting many body systems
play

The semiclassical method in interacting many body systems Path - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The semiclassical method in interacting many body systems Path integrals, fields and particles Quirin Hummel, Benjamin Geiger, Juan Diego Urbina, Klaus Richter Quantum chaos: methods and applications, March 2015 1 / 35 Motivation Particle


  1. The semiclassical method in interacting many body systems Path integrals, fields and particles Quirin Hummel, Benjamin Geiger, Juan Diego Urbina, Klaus Richter Quantum chaos: methods and applications, March 2015 1 / 35

  2. Motivation Particle Exchange Symmetry Contact-Interaction Quantum Cluster Expansion (QCE) Conclusion and Outlook Motivation: The subject (fields) Subject : Quantum Fields with large number of excitations ( N → ∞ ) So far: → Finite (Trying to do scattering) → Lattice (Trying to get continuum) → Non-Relativistic (Dreaming about QCD) → Isolated (Trying to do Feynman-Vernon) interactions → General 2 / 35

  3. Motivation Particle Exchange Symmetry Contact-Interaction Quantum Cluster Expansion (QCE) Conclusion and Outlook Motivation: The goal (fields) Goal : Study analytically non-perturbative effects in � eff = 1 /N Use only classical info (actions, stabilities, etc) from a classical (nonlinear) field equation Which properties? : dynamics (a van Vleck -Gutzwiller propagator) spectrum (a Gutzwiller trace formula) Thermodynamics How? : For the moment, using universality: → Due to single-particle chaos (Mesoscopic Boson Sampling) → Due to field chaos (Thomas Engl, Peter Schlagheck) 3 / 35

  4. Motivation Particle Exchange Symmetry Contact-Interaction Quantum Cluster Expansion (QCE) Conclusion and Outlook Break: summarizing fields Semiclassical propagator a la Gutzwiller : Write K ( ψ in , ψ fin , t ) = ´ D [ ψ ( s )]e iR [ ψ ( s )] / � eff Define classical limit δ ψ R [ ψ ( s )] = 0 and B.C. Evaluate in Stationary Phase Approximation Careful: → Coherent states (Bosons, Fermions,Klauder) → bad classical limit → Extra conditions (large densites, gauge symmetries) van Vleck-Gutzwiller propagator (Bosons, Fermions) Gutzwiller trace formula (Bosons) 4 / 35

  5. Motivation Particle Exchange Symmetry Contact-Interaction Quantum Cluster Expansion (QCE) Conclusion and Outlook Motivation: The subject (particles) Subject : fixed number of identical particles ( N ∼ O (10) ) simple external potentials: → free quantum gases with periodic boundary conditions → quantum billiards → harmonic traps → other homogeneous potentials isolated or in a thermal bath interactions between particles → model: contact-interaction 5 / 35

  6. Motivation Particle Exchange Symmetry Contact-Interaction Quantum Cluster Expansion (QCE) Conclusion and Outlook Motivation: The goal (particles) Goal : Study properties related to MB-spectrum analytically and non-perturbatively avoid numerical calculation of MB-energy levels and power series in interaction strength Which properties? : the spectrum itself canonical partition function equation of state spatial properties: → (non-local) pair correlations in (micro-)canonical ensemble → spatial particle densities near boundaries/impurities 6 / 35

  7. Motivation Particle Exchange Symmetry Contact-Interaction Quantum Cluster Expansion (QCE) Conclusion and Outlook Motivation: The goal (particles) Goal : Study properties related to MB-spectrum analytically and non-perturbatively avoid numerical calculation of MB-energy levels and power series in interaction strength Which properties? : the spectrum itself canonical partition function equation of state spatial properties: → (non-local) pair correlations in (micro-)canonical ensemble → spatial particle densities near boundaries/impurities 6 / 35

  8. Motivation Particle Exchange Symmetry Contact-Interaction Quantum Cluster Expansion (QCE) Conclusion and Outlook Many-body(MB)-spectrum: General consideration around ground state: mean-field approaches work → effectively independent particles (HF, . . . ) E sp E MB = ⇒ independent particles many-body 7 / 35

  9. Motivation Particle Exchange Symmetry Contact-Interaction Quantum Cluster Expansion (QCE) Conclusion and Outlook Many-body(MB)-spectrum: General consideration around ground state: mean-field approaches work → effectively independent particles (HF, . . . ) E sp E MB = ⇒ independent particles many-body 7 / 35

  10. Motivation Particle Exchange Symmetry Contact-Interaction Quantum Cluster Expansion (QCE) Conclusion and Outlook Many-body(MB)-spectrum: General consideration around ground state: mean-field approaches work → effectively independent particles (HF, . . . ) E sp E MB = ⇒ independent particles many-body 7 / 35

  11. Motivation Particle Exchange Symmetry Contact-Interaction Quantum Cluster Expansion (QCE) Conclusion and Outlook Many-body(MB)-spectrum: General consideration around ground state: mean-field approaches work → effectively independent particles (HF, . . . ) E sp E MB = ⇒ independent particles many-body 7 / 35

  12. Motivation Particle Exchange Symmetry Contact-Interaction Quantum Cluster Expansion (QCE) Conclusion and Outlook Many-body(MB)-spectrum: General consideration around ground state: mean-field approaches work → effectively independent particles (HF, . . . ) E sp E MB = ⇒ independent particles many-body 7 / 35

  13. Motivation Particle Exchange Symmetry Contact-Interaction Quantum Cluster Expansion (QCE) Conclusion and Outlook Many-body(MB)-spectrum: General consideration around ground state: mean-field approaches work → effectively independent particles (HF, . . . ) E sp E MB = ⇒ independent particles many-body 7 / 35

  14. Motivation Particle Exchange Symmetry Contact-Interaction Quantum Cluster Expansion (QCE) Conclusion and Outlook Many-body(MB)-spectrum: General consideration around ground state: mean-field approaches work → effectively independent particles (HF, . . . ) E sp E MB = ⇒ independent particles many-body 7 / 35

  15. Motivation Particle Exchange Symmetry Contact-Interaction Quantum Cluster Expansion (QCE) Conclusion and Outlook Many-body(MB)-spectrum: General consideration around ground state: mean-field approaches work → effectively independent particles (HF, . . . ) but: no single mean field for all excitations! (MCSCF, . . . ) E sp E MB = ⇒ ✘✘ ❳❳ independent particles many-body 7 / 35

  16. Motivation Particle Exchange Symmetry Contact-Interaction Quantum Cluster Expansion (QCE) Conclusion and Outlook Simplification Simplification : Forget about discreteness of spectrum! N 12 10 4 100 N ( E ) yaxis N = 1 / 2 1 0.01 0 50 100 150 200 E [ ̺ − 1 0 ] xaxis 8 / 35

  17. Motivation Particle Exchange Symmetry Contact-Interaction Quantum Cluster Expansion (QCE) Conclusion and Outlook Overview 1 Motivation 2 Particle Exchange Symmetry Method Thermodynamics 3 Contact-Interaction Lieb-Liniger (LL) Model Method: Two Particles Results: Two Particles 4 Quantum Cluster Expansion (QCE) Method QCE for LL Thermodynamics in QCE 5 Conclusion and Outlook 9 / 35

  18. Motivation Particle Exchange Symmetry Contact-Interaction Quantum Cluster Expansion (QCE) Conclusion and Outlook Single particle(sp) Weyl expansion 1 particle, D -dim. billiard � ˆ � ̺ sp ( E ) = FT t d qK ( q , q ; t ) ( E ) V = 0 V = ∞ 10 / 35

  19. Motivation Particle Exchange Symmetry Contact-Interaction Quantum Cluster Expansion (QCE) Conclusion and Outlook Single particle(sp) Weyl expansion 1 particle, D -dim. billiard � ˆ � ̺ sp ( E ) = FT t d qK ( q , q ; t ) ( E ) V = 0 V = ∞ smooth part ¯ ̺ ↔ short time behaviour of K D − 1 D 2 − 1 − 1 ̺ sp ( E ) = const. · V D E ¯ − const. · S D − 1 E + . . . 2 � �� � � �� � locally free reflection on flat boundary → basic geometric properties! 10 / 35

  20. Motivation Particle Exchange Symmetry Contact-Interaction Quantum Cluster Expansion (QCE) Conclusion and Outlook MB Weyl expansion for bosons ( + ) or fermions ( − ) N identical particles q = ( q 1 , . . . , q N ) 2 particles, 1D � ˆ � second particle ( N ) ( N ) ± ( E ) = FT t ̺ d q K ± ( q , q ; t ) ( E ) P q � ± ( q , q ; t ) = 1 ± ( N ) ( ± 1) P K ( N ) ( P q , q ; t ) K N ! P q first particle smooth part ¯ ̺ ± , non-interacting : Q. Hummel, J. D. Urbina and K. Richter, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 47 , 015101 (2014): P -contributions ↔ Weyl-like corrections 11 / 35

  21. Motivation Particle Exchange Symmetry Contact-Interaction Quantum Cluster Expansion (QCE) Conclusion and Outlook MB Weyl expansion for bosons ( + ) or fermions ( − ) N identical particles q = ( q 1 , . . . , q N ) 2 particles � ˆ � ( N ) ( N ) ± ( E ) = FT t ̺ d q K ± ( q , q ; t ) ( E ) � ± ( q , q ; t ) = 1 ( N ) ( ± 1) P K ( N ) ( P q , q ; t ) K N ! P smooth part ¯ ̺ ± , non-interacting : Q. Hummel, J. D. Urbina and K. Richter, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 47 , 015101 (2014): P -contributions ↔ Weyl-like corrections 11 / 35

  22. Motivation Particle Exchange Symmetry Contact-Interaction Quantum Cluster Expansion (QCE) Conclusion and Outlook MB Weyl expansion for bosons ( + ) or fermions ( − ) N identical particles q = ( q 1 , . . . , q N ) N particles � ˆ � ( N ) ( N ) ± ( E ) = FT t ̺ d q K ± ( q , q ; t ) ( E ) � ± ( q , q ; t ) = 1 ( N ) ( ± 1) P K ( N ) ( P q , q ; t ) K N ! P smooth part ¯ ̺ ± , non-interacting : Q. Hummel, J. D. Urbina and K. Richter, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 47 , 015101 (2014): P -contributions ↔ Weyl-like corrections 11 / 35

Recommend


More recommend