the second year at emory program assessing a residential
play

THE SECOND YEAR AT EMORY PROGRAM: ASSESSING A RESIDENTIAL - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

THE SECOND YEAR AT EMORY PROGRAM: ASSESSING A RESIDENTIAL SECOND-YEAR INITIATIVE Ben Perlman John Lynch Brett Page Emory University 15 th National Students in T ransition Conference 2008 GOALS FOR PRESENTATION Explain the basics of


  1. THE SECOND YEAR AT EMORY PROGRAM: ASSESSING A RESIDENTIAL SECOND-YEAR INITIATIVE Ben Perlman John Lynch Brett Page Emory University 15 th National Students in T ransition Conference 2008

  2. GOALS FOR PRESENTATION  Explain the basics of building a living- learning community for second-year students  Understand the history of Emory’s program  Learn about difgerent ways to assess your new initiative  Identify implications for student afgairs practice

  3. SNAPSHOT OF EMORY UNIVERSITY  Private, selective, research university w/an undergraduate population <6,000  2-year live-on requirement  Undergrad students admitted to liberal arts college  Some students pursue education in business or nursing school after 2 nd year of college  Many of our students are interested in pre-health or pre- professional majors and programs

  4. THE SECOND YEAR AT EMORY PROGRAM  Living-Learning Community dedicated to second-year student success  4th year of program  Programs  Career Planning  Academic Advising  Faculty Interaction  Life Skills  T raditions

  5. SYE TIMELINE @EMORY • Nov 2002: support and approval of the Campus Life Committee of the Board of Trustees • Nov 2003: SYE Committee formed • Fall 2004: began pilot program in predominately sophomore hall • Summer 2005: extensive renovation of Woodrufg, home to the program • Fall 2005: offjcial start of the program • Fall 2007: Incorporation of second residence hall • Fall 2008: Expansion to all of second-year housing

  6. SOPHOMORE STUDENT DEVELOPMENT MODEL  Staged model in which second-year students move through 4 difgerent stages:  Random Exploration  Focused Exploration  T entative Choices  Commitment  Student focus on these stages in three areas:  Peer relationships  Self  Academic choices Schaller (2005)

  7. SCHALLER (2005) Friendships Self Academics Stage 1 Accepts friendships Wanders through life Has not yet as they come, may choices, not sure of considered Random be very unhealthy what to believe academic/major Exploration choice Stage 2 Is disenchanted with Recognizes Looking for major or friendships, problems within self, career idea that Focus frustrated with bothered but not might fit with self Exploration options clear what to do Stage 3 Decides to keep Begins to make Found major or some relationships statements about career, but still not Tentative and leave others beliefs, desires, clear how it will “work Choices describes self out” Stage 4 Makes healthy Firm in description of Sees how future will choices, “college self, knows what unfold, committed to Commitment buddies” wants career

  8. SCHALLER (2006)  Implications for Community Colleges  Financial Issues  Use of credit/loans  Loss of fjrst-year aid  Developmental Education  Not directed enough in educational choices to make a choice of major  T ransfer Preparation

  9. EMORY NEEDED TO PURSUE SYE  Gap between wealth of services for fjrst-year students and absence of services for upperclassmen  Concerns about students transferring and satisfaction issues  New second-year living requirement

  10. STAFFING  2 Buildings  Hall Director Fellow  Woodrufg Hall  Full-time  Clifton T ower  Post-bach  Area Director  Live-in  Full-Time  Academic Advisor  Post-master’s degree  Part-time  Live-in  Graduate student  Graduate Student  Live-in Hall Director  Part-time  Live-in

  11. STUDENT STAFFING  1 Senior Resident Advisor (Senior)  17 Resident Advisors (Juniors and Seniors)  26 to 1 - Resident to RA Ratio

  12. SEMI-SUITE APARTMENT STYLE STYLE

  13. WOODRUFF SPACES Smart Classrooms Smart Classrooms Exercise Room Exercise Room Grilling Area Grilling Area Study Rooms Study Rooms RA Offjce RA Offjce

  14. WOODRUFF SPACES Drop-In Spaces Drop-In Spaces Professional Stafg Offjces Professional Stafg Offjces Dining Facilitjes Dining Facilitjes Academic Advising Offjce Academic Advising Offjce

  15. ASSESSMENTS WE’VE DONE

  16. ASSESSMENTS • National instruments: – Educational Benchmarking Incorporated (EBI) – National Study of Living Learning Programs (NSLLP) • Local instruments: – Sophomore specifjc survey – SYE registration form – ResLife Rewards program – Program evaluations

  17. EBI  Measures resident satisfaction and perceptions of learning experiences and climate  Distributed online  3,000 undergraduate residents sampled  25% response rate  EBI provides an in-depth statistical analysis accessible online and in paper format

  18. HIGHLIGHTS FROM EBI  Sophomores in SYE residence halls were much more satisfjed than sophomores not in SYE residence halls  Sophomores in SYE residence halls reported higher perceptions of learning than sophomores in other SYE residence halls  Students, in general, reported higher satisfaction and learning when they reported going to programs “often”

  19. NSLLP • Relatively new national instrument • Uses the I-E-O model of assessment • Measures input variables, environmental factors, and learning outcomes • Distributed online • Compares students in living-learning programs to students not in living-learning programs • 17% response rate • NSLLP provides a statistical analysis accessible in paper format

  20. HIGHLIGHTS FROM NSLLP  Signifjcantly higher than other LLP participants in terms of:  Infmuences on signing up for program: wanted to live in a specifjc residence hall  Perceived growth in cognitive complexity  Perceived confjdence in college success  Confjdence in problem-solving ability

  21. SOPHOMORE SURVEY  Asked about learning, perceptions, and feedback  Locally developed questions based on anecdotal feedback  Distributed online  Sent to all sophomores  30% response rate

  22. HIGHLIGHTS FROM SOPHOMORE SURVEY  Second-Year students want more support from Residence Life  Where students live as a second-year greatly impacts their perception of and participation in SYE.  Programming for and interactions with second-year students must be difgerent from those with fjrst-year students  Second-Year students want a stronger cohort identity/community

  23. HIGHLIGHTS FROM SOPHOMORE SURVEY  More programming on…

  24. SYE REGISTRATION • Locally developed • Originally used as an “application” into the SYE program • Online • All rising sophomores were required to complete the form if they wanted to live in the SYE designated buildings: Woodrufg and Clifton • 85% participation

  25. SYE REGISTRATION • Name, student ID # • Please mark if you are interested in any business or graduate school programs: Pre-BBA, Pre-Health, Pre-Law, PhD or Master’s, Pre-MBA • Please mark any majors you are currently pursuing or are interested in: (60 majors listed) • Please mark the topics you would be interested in learning about at future SYE programs: Choosing a major, Health and Wellness, Career decision- making/Internships, Academic advising, etc. • How would you contribute to or participate in the Second Year at Emory program?

  26. HIGHLIGHTS FROM SYE REGISTRATION  Interest in professional or graduate programs

  27. HIGHLIGHTS FROM SYE REGISTRATION  T op fjve majors: 1. Business Administration 2. Economics 3. Psychology 4. Biology 5. Chemistry

  28. HIGHLIGHTS FROM SYE REGISTRATION  T op fjve programming interests: 1. Study Abroad 2. Career Decisions & Internships 3. Community Service 4. Planning for Junior & Senior Year 5. Choosing a Major

  29. ADAPTATIONS OF SYE REGISTRATION  Require all rising sophomores to complete form as part of their housing sign-up process  Make some questions more specifjc  Ask about extracurricular involvement  Use the form as a tool to get students to think about their sophomore year and future plans

  30. RES LIFE REWARDS • Stemmed from our fjnding that more engaged students generally were more satisfjed and reported higher levels of learning • Attendance at events is carefully tracked • For every six programs a student attends he/she receives a reward – Water bottle, hydro-clock, t-shirts, journals, etc. • Analyze what types of programs students are interested in • Analyze demographics and residence hall location associated with high attendance at programs • Eventually we will analyze difgerences associated with high engagement versus low engagement

  31. PROGRAM EVALUATIONS  Distribute online  Normal satisfaction questions (how did you like this program?)  Learning outcome related questions

  32. USING THE DATA

  33. SHARING AND INTERPRETATION  Share data with RA’s and Hall Directors for programming and Coke Conversations  Share aggregate data with other offjces (particularly the Career Center, Business School, and Academic Advising) to assist them in their own planning  Ask students and RA’s to interpret the data

  34. IDENTIFIED A NEED FOR CHANGE  Sophomores felt left out of SYE programs  Students did not have a clear sense of the purpose of SYE  Students wanted more support and programming  Residents felt disconnected from their student stafg (Coke Conversations felt awkward)

Recommend


More recommend