The Samuel realcompactification Ana S. Mero no Universidad - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
The Samuel realcompactification Ana S. Mero no Universidad Complutense de Madrid Joint work with Prof. M. Isabel Garrido Ana S. Mero no The Samuel realcompactification Introduction. In this talk we will introduce a realcompactification
The Samuel realcompactification Ana S. Mero˜ no Universidad Complutense de Madrid Joint work with Prof. M. Isabel Garrido Ana S. Mero˜ no The Samuel realcompactification
Introduction. In this talk we will introduce a realcompactification for the class of uniform spaces ( X , µ ) and we will call it the Samuel realcompactification . Then we will study this realcompactification in the frame of metric spaces ( X , d ). First, we will compare the Samuel realcompactification of a metric space ( X , d ) with another type of realcompactification that can be defined for metric spaces and which is called Lipschitz realcompactification . Finally, we will see which metric spaces can be considered Samuel realcompact. Ana S. Mero˜ no The Samuel realcompactification
Contents. 1 General results about realcompactifications. 2 Examples of realcompactifications and compactifications. 3 Realcompactifications on metric spaces. 4 Equivalence of the Lipschitz and the Samuel realcompactification. 5 Samuel realcompact metric spaces. Ana S. Mero˜ no The Samuel realcompactification
Realcompactifications of a Tychonoff space. Definition. A realcompactification of a Tychonoff space X is a realcompact space Y in which X is densely embedded. compactification ⇒ realcompactification Ana S. Mero˜ no The Samuel realcompactification
Order in the realcompactifications. ( R ( X ), ≤ ) where R ( X ) = { realcompactifications of X } and ≤ is a partial order defined as follows: α 1 X ≤ α 2 X if there is h : α 2 X → α 1 X continuous, leaving X pointwise fixed Definition. Two realcompactifications α 1 X and α 2 X are equivalent whenever α 1 X ≤ α 2 X and α 2 X ≤ α 1 X . ∃ h : α 2 X → α 1 X an homeomorphism, leaving X pointwise fixed Ana S. Mero˜ no The Samuel realcompactification
Generation of realcompactifications. F ⊂ C ( X ) separating points from closed sets e : X → R F embedding e ( x ) = ( f ( x )) f ∈F R F H ( F ) = e ( X ) • H ( F ) is the smallest realcompactification of X such that every function f ∈ F can be continuously extended to it. • Whenever F has an algebraic structure, for instance, if F is a vector lattice, then H ( F ) = { real unital vector lattice homomorphisms on F} Ana S. Mero˜ no The Samuel realcompactification
Compactifications. F ∗ = F ∩ C ∗ ( X ) bounded functions of F • H ( F ∗ ) is the smallest compactification and realcompactification of X such that every function f ∈ F ∗ can be continuously extended to it. X ⊂ H ( F ) ⊂ H ( F ∗ ) Ana S. Mero˜ no The Samuel realcompactification
Hewitt realcompactification and Stone-ˇ Cech compactification. X Tychonoff space F = C ( X ) real-valued continuous functions H ( C ( X )) = υ X is the Hewitt realcompactification of X • υ X is largest element in the ordered family ( R ( X ) , ≤ ). • υ X is the smallest realcompactification of X such that every f ∈ C ( X ) is continuously extended. Ana S. Mero˜ no The Samuel realcompactification
Hewitt realcompactification and Stone-ˇ Cech compactification. F ∗ = C ∗ ( X ) bounded real-valued continuous functions H ( C ∗ ( X )) = β X is the Stone-ˇ Cech compactification of X • β X is the smallest compactification and realcompactification of X such that every f ∈ C ∗ ( X ) is continuously extended. X ⊂ υ X ⊂ β X Theorem. A Tychonoff space X is realcompact if and only if X = υ X . Ana S. Mero˜ no The Samuel realcompactification
Samuel realcompactification and compactification. ( X , µ ) uniform space F = U µ ( X ) real-valued uniformly continuous functions • H ( U µ ( X )) is the smallest realcompactification of X such that f ∈ U µ ( X ) is continuously extended. F ∗ = U ∗ µ ( X ) bounded real-valued uniformly continuous functions H ( U ∗ µ ( X )) = s µ X is the Samuel compactification of ( X , µ ) • s µ X is the smallest compactification and realcompactification of X such that every f ∈ U ∗ µ ( X ) is continuously extended. Ana S. Mero˜ no The Samuel realcompactification
Samuel realcompactification and compactification. X ⊂ H ( U µ ( X )) ⊂ s µ X We will call H ( U µ ( X )) the Samuel realcompactification of ( X , µ ) because it is associated to the family of all the real-valued uniformly continuous functions as the Samuel compactification is associated to the family of all the bounded real-valued uniformly continuous functions. Definition. A uniform space ( X , µ ) is Samuel realcompact if X = H ( U µ ( X )). Samuel realcompact ⇒ realcompact Ana S. Mero˜ no The Samuel realcompactification
Lipschitz realcompactification. ( X , d ) metric space F = Lip d ( X ) real-valued Lipschitz functions • H ( Lip d ( X )) is the smallest realcompactification of X such that every f ∈ Lip d ( X ) is continuously extended. We will call H ( Lip d ( X )) the Lipschitz realcompactification of ( X , d ) F ∗ = Lip ∗ d ( X ) bounded real-valued Lipschitz functions Theorem. H ( Lip ∗ d ( X )) is exactly the Samuel compactification s d X of ( X , d ) However in the unbounded case, H ( Lip d ( X )) and H ( U d ( X )) are in general different realcompactifications. Ana S. Mero˜ no The Samuel realcompactification
Lipschitz realcompactification. X ⊂ H ( Lip d ( X )) ⊂ s d ( X ) Definition. A metric space ( X , d ) is Lipschitz realcompact if X = H ( Lip d ( X )). Lipschitz realcompact ⇒ realcompact Ana S. Mero˜ no The Samuel realcompactification
Main reference. M. I. Garrido, A S. Mero˜ no , The Samuel realcompactification of a metric space (submitted) Ana S. Mero˜ no The Samuel realcompactification
Lipschitz realcompactification. Theorem. Let ( X , d ) be a metric space x 0 a fixed point in X and B d [ x 0 , n ] the closed ball of center x 0 and radius n ∈ N . Then � H ( Lip d ( X )) = cl s d X B d [ x 0 , n ] ⊂ s d ( X ) n ∈ N Corollary. A metric space is Lipschitz realcompact if and only if every closed bounded subset is compact. Ana S. Mero˜ no The Samuel realcompactification
Relations between the realcompactifications. X ⊂ υ X ⊂ H ( U d ( X )) ⊂ H ( Lip d ( X )) ⊂ s d X Lipschitz realcompact ⇒ Samuel realcompact u Observe that, uniformly equivalents metrics ρ ≃ d define identical Samuel realcompactifications and compactifications. u u � � � � � � H ( U d ( X )) = H ( Lip ρ ( X )) : ρ ≃ d = H ( Lip ρ ( X )) : ρ ≃ d . Ana S. Mero˜ no The Samuel realcompactification
Relations between the realcompactifications. t We write ρ ≃ d for topologically equivalent metrics. t t � � � � � � υ X = H ( U ρ ( X )) : ρ ≃ d = H ( U ρ ( X )) : ρ ≃ d t t � � � � � � υ X = H ( Lip ρ ( X )) : ρ ≃ d = H ( Lip ρ ( X )) : ρ ≃ d . Ana S. Mero˜ no The Samuel realcompactification
Problems. 1 To characterize those metric spaces ( X , d ) for which there exists a uniformly equivalent metric ρ such that H ( U d ( X )) and H ( Lip ρ ( X )) are equivalent realcompactifications, that is, H ( U d ( X )) = H ( Lip ρ ( X )). 2 To characterize those metric space ( X , d ) which are Samuel realcompact, that is, X = H ( U d ( X )). Ana S. Mero˜ no The Samuel realcompactification
Bourbaki-bounded subsets. B d ( x , ε ) be the open ball of center x ∈ X and radius ε > 0 B 2 � d ( x , ε ) = { B d ( y , ε ) : y ∈ B d ( x , ε ) } and � { B d ( y , ε ) : y ∈ B m − 1 B m d ( x , ε ) = ( x , ε ) } whenever m ≥ 3 . d Definition. A subset B of a metric space is Bourbaki-bounded if for every ε > 0 there exist finitely many points x 1 , ..., x k ∈ X such that for some m ∈ N , k � B m B ⊂ d ( x i , ε ) . i =1 Ana S. Mero˜ no The Samuel realcompactification
Bourbaki-bounded subsets. Theorem. (Atsuji) For a subset B of a metric space ( X , d ) the following statements are equivalent: 1 B is Bourbaki-bounded; 2 f ( B ) ⊂ R is bounded for every f ∈ U d ( X ). Ana S. Mero˜ no The Samuel realcompactification
Bourbaki-bounded subsets. Examples. 1 Totally bounded subsets of metric spaces are Bourbaki-bounded. 2 Bounded subsets of normed vector spaces are Bourbaki-bounded. 3 Let X = N × ℓ 2 where N brings the 0 − 1 discrete metric and ℓ 2 is the classical Hilbert spaces. Let d the product metric. Then, in ( X , d ), bounded subset are not Bourbaki-bounded and Bourbaki-bounded subsets are not totally bounded. Ana S. Mero˜ no The Samuel realcompactification
Hejcman’s problem. BB d ( X ) = { Bourbaki-bounded subsets } B d ( X ) = { bounded subsets } J. Hejcman , On simple recognizing of bounded sets Comment. Math. Univ. Carolinae, 38 (1997), 149-156. To determine those metric spaces ( X , d ) such that for some u uniformly equivalent ρ ≃ d, BB d ( X ) = B ρ ( X ) . Example. Every normed vector space satisfies that BB d ( X ) = B d ( X ). Ana S. Mero˜ no The Samuel realcompactification
Main result. Proposition For a metric space ( X , d ) the following statements are equivalent: u 1 there exists a uniformly equivalent metric ρ ≃ d such that H ( U d ( X )) is equivalent to H ( Lip ρ ( X )) ; 2 H ( U d ( X )) uniformly locally compact for the weak uniformity on H ( U d ( X )) as a uniform subspace of the product space R U d ( X ) ; 3 every uniform partition of X is countable and there exists ǫ > 0 such that for every x ∈ X and every m ∈ N , B m d ( x , ε ) is a Bourbaki-bounded subset; u 4 there exists a uniformly equivalent metric ρ ≃ d such that BB d ( X ) = B ρ ( X ) . Ana S. Mero˜ no The Samuel realcompactification
Recommend
More recommend
Explore More Topics
Stay informed with curated content and fresh updates.