the power of two choices in regulating interval partitions
play

The Power of Two-Choices in Regulating Interval Partitions Ohad N. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition The Power of Two-Choices in Regulating Interval Partitions Ohad N. Feldheim (Stanford) Joint work with Ori


  1. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Power of two choices - remarks This observation had many applications • Server load-balancing • Distributed shared memory • Efficient on-line hashing • Low-congestion circuit routing It is interesting to note that

  2. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Power of two choices - remarks This observation had many applications • Server load-balancing • Distributed shared memory • Efficient on-line hashing • Low-congestion circuit routing It is interesting to note that • More choice does not significantly reduce the maximum load.

  3. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Power of two choices - remarks This observation had many applications • Server load-balancing • Distributed shared memory • Efficient on-line hashing • Low-congestion circuit routing It is interesting to note that • More choice does not significantly reduce the maximum load. • If balls keep appearing and dying at rate 1 the phenomenon persists (Luczak & McDiarmid ’05)

  4. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Power of two choices - remarks This observation had many applications • Server load-balancing • Distributed shared memory • Efficient on-line hashing • Low-congestion circuit routing It is interesting to note that • More choice does not significantly reduce the maximum load. • If balls keep appearing and dying at rate 1 the phenomenon persists (Luczak & McDiarmid ’05) • However if one can’t keep track of the number of balls per bin (due to having M 1 − ǫ bits of memory), then no asymptotic improvement over no-choice is possible (Alon, Gurel-Gurevich, Lubetzky ’09)

  5. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Two-choices and One-retry One-retry: A related intermediate setup. The chooser is only offered a chance to re-roll the target bin once per ball.

  6. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Two-choices and One-retry One-retry: A related intermediate setup. The chooser is only offered a chance to re-roll the target bin once per ball.

  7. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Two-choices and One-retry One-retry: A related intermediate setup. The chooser is only offered a chance to re-roll the target bin once per ball.

  8. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Two-choices and One-retry One-retry: A related intermediate setup. The chooser is only offered a chance to re-roll the target bin once per ball.

  9. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Two-choices and One-retry One-retry: A related intermediate setup. The chooser is only offered a chance to re-roll the target bin once per ball.

  10. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Two-choices and One-retry One-retry: A related intermediate setup. The chooser is only offered a chance to re-roll the target bin once per ball.

  11. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Two-choices and One-retry One-retry: A related intermediate setup. The chooser is only offered a chance to re-roll the target bin once per ball.

  12. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Two-choices and One-retry One-retry: A related intermediate setup. The chooser is only offered a chance to re-roll the target bin once per ball.

  13. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Two-choices and One-retry One-retry: A related intermediate setup. The chooser is only offered a chance to re-roll the target bin once per ball.

  14. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Two-choices and One-retry One-retry: A related intermediate setup. The chooser is only offered a chance to re-roll the target bin once per ball.

  15. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Two-choices and One-retry One-retry: A related intermediate setup. The chooser is only offered a chance to re-roll the target bin once per ball. Equivalent to being oblivious to one of the two bins in the two choices setup.

  16. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Two-choices and One-retry One-retry: A related intermediate setup. The chooser is only offered a chance to re-roll the target bin once per ball. Equivalent to being oblivious to one of the two bins in the two choices setup. Asymptotic discrepancy like two-choices when N ≫ M .

  17. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Two-choices and One-retry One-retry: A related intermediate setup. The chooser is only offered a chance to re-roll the target bin once per ball. Equivalent to being oblivious to one of the two bins in the two choices setup. Asymptotic discrepancy like two-choices when � N ≫ M . When N = M , the discrepancy is log M / log log M .

  18. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Interval partition Consider an online process in which an interval is partitioned into smaller and smaller subintervals by selecting new partition points uniformly at random.

  19. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Interval partition Consider an online process in which an interval is partitioned into smaller and smaller subintervals by selecting new partition points uniformly at random.

  20. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Interval partition Consider an online process in which an interval is partitioned into smaller and smaller subintervals by selecting new partition points uniformly at random.

  21. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Interval partition Consider an online process in which an interval is partitioned into smaller and smaller subintervals by selecting new partition points uniformly at random.

  22. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Interval partition Consider an online process in which an interval is partitioned into smaller and smaller subintervals by selecting new partition points uniformly at random.

  23. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Interval partition Consider an online process in which an interval is partitioned into smaller and smaller subintervals by selecting new partition points uniformly at random.

  24. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Interval partition Consider an online process in which an interval is partitioned into smaller and smaller subintervals by selecting new partition points uniformly at random.

  25. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Interval partition Consider an online process in which an interval is partitioned into smaller and smaller subintervals by selecting new partition points uniformly at random. We view the points at time n as each having 1 / n mass, call this µ n

  26. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Interval partition Consider an online process in which an interval is partitioned into smaller and smaller subintervals by selecting new partition points uniformly at random. We view the points at time n as each having 1 / n mass, call this µ n Convergence to uniform measure: lim n →∞ µ n T . V . = U [0 , 1]

  27. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Interval partition Consider an online process in which an interval is partitioned into smaller and smaller subintervals by selecting new partition points uniformly at random. We view the points at time n as each having 1 / n mass, call this µ n Convergence to uniform measure: lim n →∞ µ n T . V . = U [0 , 1] Three natural ways to measure discrepancy/rate of convergence:

  28. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Interval partition Consider an online process in which an interval is partitioned into smaller and smaller subintervals by selecting new partition points uniformly at random. We view the points at time n as each having 1 / n mass, call this µ n Convergence to uniform measure: lim n →∞ µ n T . V . = U [0 , 1] Three natural ways to measure discrepancy/rate of convergence: Geometric: • Interval variation - max a , b | µ n (( a , b )) − µ (( a , b )) |

  29. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Interval partition Consider an online process in which an interval is partitioned into smaller and smaller subintervals by selecting new partition points uniformly at random. We view the points at time n as each having 1 / n mass, call this µ n Convergence to uniform measure: lim n →∞ µ n T . V . = U [0 , 1] Three natural ways to measure discrepancy/rate of convergence: Geometric: • Interval variation - max a , b | µ n (( a , b )) − µ (( a , b )) | • Largest/smallest interval - max a , b | ( µ n (( a , b )) = 0) − 1 / n |

  30. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Interval partition Consider an online process in which an interval is partitioned into smaller and smaller subintervals by selecting new partition points uniformly at random. We view the points at time n as each having 1 / n mass, call this µ n Convergence to uniform measure: lim n →∞ µ n T . V . = U [0 , 1] Three natural ways to measure discrepancy/rate of convergence: Geometric: • Interval variation - max a , b | µ n (( a , b )) − µ (( a , b )) | • Largest/smallest interval - max a , b | ( µ n (( a , b )) = 0) − 1 / n | Non-geometric: • Empirical normalized interval distribution.

  31. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Two-choices and interval partitions Benjamini: Can two choices regulate interval partitions?

  32. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Two-choices and interval partitions Benjamini: Can two choices regulate interval partitions? In particular what if we partition the largest interval? What if we choose the point furthest from neighbour? ? ?

  33. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Two-choices and interval partitions Benjamini: Can two choices regulate interval partitions? In particular what if we partition the largest interval? What if we choose the point furthest from neighbour? ? ?

  34. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Two-choices and interval partitions Benjamini: Can two choices regulate interval partitions? In particular what if we partition the largest interval? What if we choose the point furthest from neighbour? ? ?

  35. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Two-choices and interval partitions Benjamini: Can two choices regulate interval partitions? In particular what if we partition the largest interval? What if we choose the point furthest from neighbour? Cf. Kakutani process - uniform partition of the largest interval.

  36. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Two-choices and interval partitions Benjamini: Can two choices regulate interval partitions? In particular what if we partition the largest interval? What if we choose the point furthest from neighbour? Cf. Kakutani process - uniform partition of the largest interval.

  37. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Two-choices and interval partitions Benjamini: Can two choices regulate interval partitions? In particular what if we partition the largest interval? What if we choose the point furthest from neighbour? Cf. Kakutani process - uniform partition of the largest interval.

  38. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Two-choices and interval partitions Benjamini: Can two choices regulate interval partitions? In particular what if we partition the largest interval? What if we choose the point furthest from neighbour? Cf. Kakutani process - uniform partition of the largest interval.

  39. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Two-choices and interval partitions Benjamini: Can two choices regulate interval partitions? In particular what if we partition the largest interval? What if we choose the point furthest from neighbour? Cf. Kakutani process - uniform partition of the largest interval. Empirical normalized interval dist. Uniform interval partition → Exp (1) Kakutani interval partition → U (0 , 2) (Pyke 80’) Max-2 interval partition → ???

  40. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Two-choices and interval partitions Benjamini: Can two choices regulate interval partitions? In particular what if we partition the largest interval? What if we choose the point furthest from neighbour? Cf. Kakutani process - uniform partition of the largest interval. Empirical normalized interval dist. Uniform interval partition → Exp (1) Kakutani interval partition → U (0 , 2) (Pyke 80’) Max-2 interval partition → ??? However, even Kakutani process offers merely a factor 2 improvement over the uniform process in terms of interval variation (Pyke-Zwet 2004).

  41. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Convergence of 2-Max interval partition process Studying 2 -Max is a rather difficult task: Maillard & Paquette ’14: 2 -Max converges to some limit distribution.

  42. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Convergence of 2-Max interval partition process Studying 2 -Max is a rather difficult task: Maillard & Paquette ’14: 2 -Max converges to some limit distribution. Junge ’15: 2 -Max converges to U [0 , 1] .

  43. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Convergence of 2-Max interval partition process Studying 2 -Max is a rather difficult task: Maillard & Paquette ’14: 2 -Max converges to some limit distribution. Junge ’15: 2 -Max converges to U [0 , 1] . Both experimental and heuristic arguments suggest that 2 -Max offers no improvement in interval variation when compared with uniform.

  44. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Convergence of 2-Max interval partition process Studying 2 -Max is a rather difficult task: Maillard & Paquette ’14: 2 -Max converges to some limit distribution. Junge ’15: 2 -Max converges to U [0 , 1] . Both experimental and heuristic arguments suggest that 2 -Max offers no improvement in interval variation when compared with uniform. We believe that no local algorithm can obtain significant improvement.

  45. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Convergence of 2-Max interval partition process Studying 2 -Max is a rather difficult task: Maillard & Paquette ’14: 2 -Max converges to some limit distribution. Junge ’15: 2 -Max converges to U [0 , 1] . Both experimental and heuristic arguments suggest that 2 -Max offers no improvement in interval variation when compared with uniform. We believe that no local algorithm can obtain significant improvement. In a sense, corresponds to Alon, Gurel-Gurevich, Lubetzky.

  46. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Global strategy that regulates interval variation Our main result is a global one-retry strategy which reduces discrepancy in interval partitions significantly.

  47. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Global strategy that regulates interval variation Our main result is a global one-retry strategy which reduces discrepancy in interval partitions significantly. Power of two-choices in regulating interval discrepancy (F. & Gurel-Gurevich 2016+) In a power of one-retry process on U [0 , 1] , the chooser can obtain a , b | µ n (( a , b )) − µ (( a , b )) | < C log 3 N � � lim max = 1 . n →∞ P N

  48. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Global strategy that regulates interval variation Our main result is a global one-retry strategy which reduces discrepancy in interval partitions significantly. Power of two-choices in regulating interval discrepancy (F. & Gurel-Gurevich 2016+) In a power of one-retry process on U [0 , 1] , the chooser can obtain a , b | µ n (( a , b )) − µ (( a , b )) | < C log 3 N � � lim max = 1 . n →∞ P N � • Cf. lower bound of C log N C log N , no choice estimate . N N

  49. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Global strategy that regulates interval variation Our main result is a global one-retry strategy which reduces discrepancy in interval partitions significantly. Power of two-choices in regulating interval discrepancy (F. & Gurel-Gurevich 2016+) In a power of one-retry process on U [0 , 1] , the chooser can obtain a , b | µ n (( a , b )) − µ (( a , b )) | < C log 3 N � � lim max = 1 . n →∞ P N � • Cf. lower bound of C log N C log N , no choice estimate . N N • There exists a single universal strategy which obtains this for all N .

  50. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Global strategy that regulates interval variation The result is obtained through a discrete counterpart which also may be of interest.

  51. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Global strategy that regulates interval variation The result is obtained through a discrete counterpart which also may be of interest. Discrete counterpart For N balls on U ([ M ]) , a probabilistic retry strategy obtains � � a < b ∈ [ M ] | µ n ([ a , b ]) − µ ([ a , b ]) | > ∆ log 3 M ≤ Ce − c ∆ . max P

  52. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Statistical implication Consider a researcher who is interested in gathering cardiovascular data on a population.

  53. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Statistical implication Consider a researcher who is interested in gathering cardiovascular data on a population. • It is well known that this data is correlated with the height of the sampled person.

  54. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Statistical implication Consider a researcher who is interested in gathering cardiovascular data on a population. • It is well known that this data is correlated with the height of the sampled person. • Height test is cheap, cardiovascular test - expansive.

  55. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Statistical implication Consider a researcher who is interested in gathering cardiovascular data on a population. • It is well known that this data is correlated with the height of the sampled person. • Height test is cheap, cardiovascular test - expansive. • Height distribution in the population is well known.

  56. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Statistical implication Consider a researcher who is interested in gathering cardiovascular data on a population. • It is well known that this data is correlated with the height of the sampled person. • Height test is cheap, cardiovascular test - expansive. • Height distribution in the population is well known. One by one volunteers suggest themselves to be tested, and it is desirable to obtain an overall sample which matches the empirical distribution of height.

  57. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Statistical implication Consider a researcher who is interested in gathering cardiovascular data on a population. • It is well known that this data is correlated with the height of the sampled person. • Height test is cheap, cardiovascular test - expansive. • Height distribution in the population is well known. One by one volunteers suggest themselves to be tested, and it is desirable to obtain an overall sample which matches the empirical distribution of height. Our result implies that by rejecting at most one of every two candidates this could be done.

  58. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Stochastic point of view on the power of one-retry

  59. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition

  60. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Large family of one-retry distributions What kind of distributions could be realized using one retry?

  61. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Large family of one-retry distributions What kind of distributions could be realized using one retry? Observation I 1 3 Every distribution with “density” 2 M ≤ g ( x ) ≤ 2 M on [ M ] could be realized by a (probabilistic) one-retry strategy.

  62. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Large family of one-retry distributions What kind of distributions could be realized using one retry? Observation I 1 3 Every distribution with “density” 2 M ≤ g ( x ) ≤ 2 M on [ M ] could be realized by a (probabilistic) one-retry strategy. In general any distribution with Radon-Nikodim Derivative w.r.t the base distribution between 0.5 and 1.5 could be realized

  63. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Large family of one-retry distributions What kind of distributions could be realized using one retry? Observation I 1 3 Every distribution with “density” 2 M ≤ g ( x ) ≤ 2 M on [ M ] could be realized by a (probabilistic) one-retry strategy. In general any distribution with Radon-Nikodim Derivative w.r.t the base distribution between 0.5 and 1.5 could be realized Proof. Write f ( x ) = 3 2 − Mg ( x ) , and retry x with probability f ( x ) .

  64. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Large family of one-retry distributions What kind of distributions could be realized using one retry? Observation I 1 3 Every distribution with “density” 2 M ≤ g ( x ) ≤ 2 M on [ M ] could be realized by a (probabilistic) one-retry strategy. In general any distribution with Radon-Nikodim Derivative w.r.t the base distribution between 0.5 and 1.5 could be realized Proof. Write f ( x ) = 3 2 − Mg ( x ) , and retry x with probability f ( x ) . f ( x ) The probability of a random bin to be re-rolled is � M M = 1 2 . i =1

  65. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Large family of one-retry distributions What kind of distributions could be realized using one retry? Observation I 1 3 Every distribution with “density” 2 M ≤ g ( x ) ≤ 2 M on [ M ] could be realized by a (probabilistic) one-retry strategy. In general any distribution with Radon-Nikodim Derivative w.r.t the base distribution between 0.5 and 1.5 could be realized Proof. Write f ( x ) = 3 2 − Mg ( x ) , and retry x with probability f ( x ) . f ( x ) The probability of a random bin to be re-rolled is � M M = 1 2 . i =1 Hence the probability that x is chosen is now 1 − f ( x ) 1 + 2 M = g ( x ) M .

  66. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Self regulating point process What kind of distributions do we wish to realize? .

  67. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Self regulating point process What kind of distributions do we wish to realize? - First - how to recover original balls and bins result with N ≫ M . .

  68. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Self regulating point process What kind of distributions do we wish to realize? - First - how to recover original balls and bins result with N ≫ M . Consider a point process X t with changing causal intensity λ ( t ) , defined by λ ( t ) = 1 + θ X t ≤ t λ ( t ) = 1 − θ X t > t .

  69. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Self regulating point process What kind of distributions do we wish to realize? - First - how to recover original balls and bins result with N ≫ M . Consider a point process X t with changing causal intensity λ ( t ) , defined by λ ( t ) = 1 + θ X t ≤ t λ ( t ) = 1 − θ X t > t Proposition � � | X t − t | > ∆ < C θ − 2 e − ∆ / 3 For such a process P θ .

  70. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Self regulating point process What kind of distributions do we wish to realize? - First - how to recover original balls and bins result with N ≫ M . Consider a point process X t with changing causal intensity λ ( t ) , defined by λ ( t ) = 1 + θ X t ≤ t λ ( t ) = 1 − θ X t > t Proposition � � | X t − t | > ∆ < C θ − 2 e − ∆ / 3 For such a process P θ i.e. for θ < 1 , such a process has typical fluctuation O ( − log θ ) . θ

  71. Two-choices for Balls and Bins Interval Partition Results and Method Method - Balls & Bins Method - Interval Partition Recovering the N ≫ M balls and bins result Now let us consider M such self regulating processes.

Recommend


More recommend