the impact of social capital on patients with multiple
play

The Impact of Social Capital on Patients with Multiple Sclerosis. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Impact of Social Capital on Patients with Multiple Sclerosis. Sal Reyes, Sebastin Suarez, Kimberley Allen-Philbey, Alison Thomson, Gavin Giovannoni Social Capital Resources derived from the social interaction between individuals


  1. The Impact of Social Capital on Patients with Multiple Sclerosis. Saúl Reyes, Sebastián Suarez, Kimberley Allen-Philbey, Alison Thomson, Gavin Giovannoni

  2. Social Capital • Resources derived from the social interaction between individuals and groups: – Networks. – Organizations. – Social trust within a community. – Norms of reciprocity. Reyes S., Giovannoni G., Thomson A. Social capital: Implications for neurology . Brain Behav 2019;9:e01169.

  3. Social Capital and Health AD Stroke Dhand A et al. Nat Rev Neurol. 2016

  4. Objective • To investigate the effect of SC on the physical and psychological impact of MS.

  5. Methods • A cross-sectional study was conducted among 236 pwMS at The Royal London Hospital, London, UK. • Participants completed an online survey including: MSIS-29, HADS, self-reported EDSS and a SC questionnaire. • The SC questionnaire assessed social networks, trust and norms, personal relationships and civic engagement.

  6. Methods • Kendall's tau correlation test was performed to measure the correlation between SC and MSIS-29. • Multiple linear regressions were conducted to find the best outcome prediction model. • Assumptions were checked for each model: independence of errors, multicollinearity and homoscedasticity.

  7. Results ! n % ! Median IQR ! ! Sex Age (yrs) 43.5 35-52 Female 168 71.2 Disease duration (yrs) 8 4-13 Male 68 28.8 Income decile 5 3-7.8 Type of MS EDSS 4 2.5-6.5 RR 180 76.3 HADS-A 8 4.8-11.3 SP 34 14.4 HADS-D 6 3-9 PP 22 9.3 MSIS-29-PHYS 23.7 8.8-57.5 Race MSIS-29-PSYCH 38.9 16.7-55.6 White 172 72.9 Social capital Asian 27 11.4 Relationships 3 3-4 Black 21 8.9 Social networks 1 1-2 Other/Not stated 16 6.8 Civic engagement 3 2-4 Living arrangements Trust and norms 4 2-5 Family 179 75.8 Total 12 9-14 Friends 11 4.7 ! n % ! Strangers 3 1.3 Marital status Alone 43 18.2 Married 134 56.8 Education Other 102 43.2 College or more 190 80.5 Employment status Secondary school 42 17.8 Employed 140 59.3 Primary school or less 4 1.7 Unemployed 96 40.7

  8. Results Correlation between SC and MSIS-29 MSIS-29-PSYCH MSIS-29-PHYS SC SC

  9. Results ! Adjusted R 2 value Estimate ! Standard Error P Value MSIS-29-PHYS * Total SC -0.09 0.34 0.800 0.78 SC domains 0.77 Relationships -0.92 1.13 0.418 Social Networks 0.22 1.26 0.865 Civic Engagement 0.02 0.73 0.978 Trust and norms 0.12 0.64 0.850 MSIS-29-PSYCH ** Total SC -1.97 0.44 <0.001 0.34 SC domains 0.37 Relationships -6.29 1.41 <0.001 Social Networks 1.13 1.62 0.486 Civic Engagement -0.28 0.98 0.774 Trust and norms -1.66 0.83 0.046 * Adjusted for EDSS, Type of MS, DMT, disease duration, age, ethnicity, HADS-D, income, marital status and living arrangements. ** Adjusted for EDSS, Type of MS, DMT, disease duration, age, education status, income and time in current home.

  10. Conclusions • Higher levels of SC were associated with lower self-rated psychological impact of MS. • Emerging evidence on SC and MS should be translated into interventions for health-promoting purposes.

  11. What's next? SC Interven'on SC Interven*on

  12. The Impact of Social Capital on Patients with Multiple Sclerosis. Saúl Reyes, Sebastián Suarez, Kimberley Allen-Philbey, Alison Thomson, Gavin Giovannoni

Recommend


More recommend