The CUPA Implementation Lab in Novi Sad, Serbia Darko Polić, PE ‘Urban Planning, Research and Development Centre’ Novi Sad, Serbia 1
EU Danube strategy for the Danube region countries 2
Republic of Serbia/ Autonomus province of Vojvodina Republic of Serbia Area: 88.361m2 Population: 7.150.000 Autonomous Province of Vojvodina Area: 21.506m2 Population: 1.915.000 3
Novi Sad- history of the place City of Novi Sad Free Royal City Charter Charter of 1st February 1748. City area: 11.000 ha (inner city) 70.000 ha (greater city) Number of inhabitants : 222.000. (inner city) 335.701 (greater city) 4 4
The Satelite The Structure Plan photo of Novi Sad of Novi Sad to 2021 5
6
Left bank area of Novi Sad Liman Telep Adice 7
Statistics and function indicators Population trends in Novi Sad 1948-2011 Function Area (ha) Percentage (%) Census years in 1000 inhabitans 1948 1953 1961 1971 1981 1991 2002 2011 Touristic-Sport-and-Recreational Area 141.51 35.86 Sport Complexes with Commercial Facilities 19.29 4.88 111. 120. 155. 206. 250. 265. 299. 360. Tourist-Sport-Recreational and Commercial 29.03 7.35 Facilities Tourist and Hospitality-Catering Facilites 17.11 4.34 City Marina Complex 12.59 3.19 Tourist-Sport Marina Complex 3.23 0.81 Weekend Retreat Zone 1.59 0.40 Rowing Lane 37.31 9.48 Bathing-Beaches 21.36 5.41 General City Centers 4.59 1.16 Local communities in numbers Business-Cultural Facilities 4.57 1.16 Place of Worship 0.025 0.006 Green Belt Areas 50.30 12.75 number of Urban Forest 39.88 10.11 local community unit m² inhebitans Liman Protective Greenery 10.35 2.62 Liman 115567 4476 Public Facilities 2.83 0.72 Boško Buha 161688 7004 Student Dorms and the Protected Heritage Zone 2.83 0.72 Liman 3 272843 11764 32487 Infrastructural Areas 157.63 39.95 Ivo Andrić 81544 3991 Hidrotechnical Infrastructure 0.34 0.086 Ostrvo 115383 5252 Water Area (The Danube and The Danube Inlet) 141.39 35.83 Južni Telep 138218 6819 The Embankment/Causeway – The Quay 15,90 4,03 Telep Nikola Tesla 181931 6569 19844 Traffic Area 37.69 9.55 Road Traffic 30.23 7.69 Bratstvo 149118 6456 Parking Lots 7.33 1.86 Adice 175138 8729 8729 TOTAL 394,55 100 61060 8
Previous analysis Area of the EXPO analysis of the Chinese district (revitalization of Danube) www.parqueexpo.pt GTZ Land Relocation Project (shipyard- brownfield area) www.ambero-icon.rs JP “Urbanizam” analysis www.nsurbanizam.rs 9
10
Preparations 11
Stating the Problems connectivity Critical mass Promotion and identity Human scale Process marketing Easiest and safest Chinese district: a Chinese As a contrast C.district= C.district:public/ public connection vibrant night clubs’ District: to City creative private Novi Sad- Danube, area, Student reachable on beach"Štrand quarter of NS partnership, City beach "Štrand", Culture Centre. The foot, by “ Chinese City marina= City marina: Chinese district- rest is neglected public district and new nautical public/ public= neglected ex and un(der)used. transport, the rest of the gate NS city/ province industrial area, Fisherman island is bicycle etc. area by the F.island: partnership, Military base- an a summertime area: F.island:not Danube inlet camping site, All green places obstacle! fishermen houses, well are not very fisherman in public domain Fisherman houses restaurants, night connected much alive village, (city/province) on the (Fisherman) club on pontoons in (bicycle&car) and looked nightlife and be used as a island, a long SE Europe K.island:badly after areas. It economy… main city green Pontoon houses and summers. connected- in is not Strengthenin space, park, docks for vessels The rest is a Novi Sad's conceived as g the public urban forest etc. Šodroš inlet - fishing/ neglected and terms. a friendly awareness of Shipyard's sliding and swan potentially Military Base surrounding eco resources developing plan resort dangerous forest and shipyard for any kind of the 2 remains a Spooky Kamenica (camp?). are spatial of activity. islands and mystery at the island Kamenica island has obstacles! by Danube moment no human scale all year long 12
participants International intervision institute: External Experts: Haccou, Huibert .A, Glasl Sascha, Kramer, Martijn De Vries, Christopher Hyclama Vlieg, Elsbeth Norderud, Brede Haccou, Femke Pamer, Volkmar International partners: Damm, Markus Patti, Stelmachowicz- Dziech,Dinka,Hrdy... From Serbian & region Jevtić, Đilas, Polić, Manasijević, Perić, Zorić, Reba, Lovrić, Marković, Đujić, Pihler, Kulačin, Berc, Bede, Grčić,Ilić,Erdeljan...
participants
participants
Conclusions and legacy • Work on leadership and vision • Recognize (all possible) stakeholders • Encourage local entrepreneurs • Inspire local community participation • Establish a platform for cooperation • Break the barriers in public-public communication • Develop the models of good contemporary practice • Revive the edges, Rebuilt and refill public space, ecourage the good practice(s) • Acknowledge others experience in establishing the process 16
Thank you for your attention 17
Recommend
More recommend
