THE ARAB-ISRAELI WARS Fabian Gacayan, Colin Jones, and Jessica Kirk. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

THE ARAB-ISRAELI WARS Fabian Gacayan, Colin Jones, and Jessica Kirk.

Fabian HISTORICAL BACKGROUND McMahon-Hussein Correspondence (1915/1916) -Promises Arabs a state in the Middle East in a region that includes Palestine Sykes-Picot Agreement (1916) -Splits up region between France and Britain in formal and informal influences -Russian Tsar wanted a Russian sphere of influence -Soviets leak the agreement to world, following the Bolshevik Revolution Balfour Declaration (1917) -U.K. pledges to support a Jewish polity -Theodor Herzl ( Der Judenstaat , 1896)

Fabian DEMOGRAPHICS Populations (1922) (Jewish Virtual Library) Larger Towns: 235,000 Smaller Towns: 465,000 Christians/Other : 82,498 (11%) Jewish : 83,794 (11%) Muslims : 590,890 (78%) Total: 757,182 procon.org

Colin Population of Mandatory Palestine by religion (1945) Jewish: 553,600 Muslim:1,061,270 Christian: 149,650 1946

THE ARAB-ISRAELI WARS Colin WAR BELLIGERENTS (Aggressor vs Defender) Israeli War of Independence/al-Nakba (1948) Arab League (Egypt, Iraq, Transjordan, Lebanon, and Syria) vs. Israel Tripartite Aggression/The Sinai War (1956) Tripartite Alliance (France, United Kingdom, and Israel) vs. Egypt The Six-Day War (1967) Israel vs. Arab League The Yom Kippur War (1973) Egypt & Syria vs. Israel First Intifada (1987) Palestinian Guerillas vs. Israel Second Intifada (2000) Palestinian Guerillas vs. Israel Third Intifada? (2015) Palestinian Guerillas vs. Israel

Colin THEORIES FOR THE CAUSE OF THIS CONFLICT Marxian/Liberal Theory: We think that both Marxian and Liberal theories explain this conflict well. Both theories agree on the cause of this conflict: imperialism. Marxian: Imperialism leads to imperialist rivalries that lead to violent revolution. Liberal/Neo-Marxian: Imperialism leads to imperialist rivalries and the adoption of policies that lead to war. Keep these paradigms in mind as we examine specific theories.

Colin NATIONALISM Conservative thought : Humanity is naturally divided into smaller units or nations that hold certain commonalities. Liberal and Marxian thought : Humanity created nation states to further economic interests. Neo-Marxian thought : Neo-Marxians go further by stating that nations are created to exploit weaker nations for an economic gain on a world systems scale. Religious Secular Pan-Islamism: is a movement that defined an Zionism: is a movement that defined an Islamic religious community (sometimes divided ethnically Jewish community as a basis for a by sect) as a basis for a state state, creating a Jewish homeland is critical Pan-Arabism: is a movement for an ethnically Arab state Regional Nationalism: is a movement for a state based on geographic location, e.g. Egyptian nationalism, Palestinian nationalism

Jessica RELIGIOUS PROPERTIES TO NATIONALISM “The religion of the 21st century” All nationalisms resemble religious movements: - They are based on a set of myths and beliefs (rather than rational analyses) - They require from their adherents to be absolutely loyal to the higher cause of the nation - Veneration their national iconography (flag, anthem) - Participation in national rituals (parades) - Respect the cult of a national hero/leader - Sacrifice of self for the abstract entity called nation.

PART ONE: ISRAEL’s INDEPENDANCE, & SINAI

Fabian (1948) ISRAELI WAR FOR INDEPENDENCE / AL-NAKBA While Jews continue to immigrate by the thousands, the U.K. Mandate runs out, but the country is war weary and out of money. No renewal of the mandate is attempted. Israel declares independence on 14 May 1948. Within days, Arab League declares war and invades Israel. Israel emerges victorious but Jordan captures the West Bank and Egypt captures the Gaza Strip. Over 700,000 Palestinians are displaced - become refugees. Demographics Nationalism Jewish: (1922) 83,794 Zionists believe that Jews need (1945) 553,600 their own state in order to exist. 561% increase Muslim: British Mandate causes the (1922) 590,890 emergence of Arab nationalism. (1945) 1,061,270 Arabs fear that Zionists will take 80% increase more neighboring territory. Christian: (1922) 82,498 (1945) 149,650 81% increase

Fabian (1948) ISRAELI WAR FOR INDEPENDENCE / AL-NAKBA Primary Theories : Transition of Power Theory- Wars are a result of power transitions that occur when an industrialized and modernized rival challenges the old leader. War Weariness Theory- Nations that have recently experienced a long and costly should be the most peaceful - at least in the short term. Process: The U.K. pulls out of Palestine, the British Mandate ends. Millions of British pounds are lost on the military upkeep Zionist insurgents harass war-weary U.K. The U.K’s unilateral decision to withdraw in 1947, disrupts the balance of power. Multiple actors see an opportunity to take power and attempt to seize it.

Fabian (1956) THE TRIPARTITE AGGRESSION/THE SINAI WAR By 1956 the Suez Canal is the highway for petroleum bound for Europe. 1.2 million barrels of oil pass through the Suez Canal daily. Egyptian President Nasser nationalizes Suez Canal. The U.K., France and Israel form the Tripartite Alliance and invade Egypt. Results in a decisive Tripartite military victory and an Egyptian political victory when the U.S. and U.S.S.R force a withdrawal. U.N. emergency forces are stationed in the Sinai Peninsula. Nationalism Egypt views the revenue made by the Suez Canal as belonging to Egypt. The Tripartite Alliance has significant economic interests in the Suez Canal.

Fabian (1956) THE TRIPARTITE AGGRESSION/THE SINAI WAR Primary Theories Imperialism- Aggressive expansion aimed at the establishment of foreign colonies for natural resources. Secondary Theories : Dependency Theory- Resources flow from a “periphery” of poor, underdeveloped states to a “core” of wealthy states. The “core” is enriched at the expense of the “periphery”. Balance of Power-Equal power dissuades adventurism. Superiority may tempt the possessor to gain power at the expense of others. Process : Imperialism: Dependency-Theory: -Suez Canal is nationalized by Nasser against 1956: Nasser recognizes the PRC as “China” Tripartite wishes 1956: U.S. removes Aswan Dam (Egypt) funding -Britain, France, and Israel invade Egypt Two things can happen: Balance of Power: -Egypt receives funding from the -Egypt disrupts the balance of power in place by U.S.S.R., but U.S. propaganda is used in taking the Suez Canal the Eastern bloc -The Tripartite respond, initiating war -U.S.S.R. can’t fund the construction .

PART TWO: THE SIX-DAY WAR (1967) & THE YOM KIPPUR WAR (1973)

Colin (1967) SIX-DAY WAR Nasser requests the withdrawal of U.N. forces from the Sinai, his request is fulfilled. Nasser forms an union with Syria (known as the U.A.R. (1958-1961)) and mobilizes two divisions (20,000-35,000 troops) in the Sinai Peninsula in response to Soviet intelligence “confirming” an Israeli military mobilization on Syrian border. Israel chooses to launch a preemptive strike. Israel destroys the Egyptian Air Force within hours, and then routs Arab League troops and captures the West Bank, the Gaza Strip, the Sinai Peninsula, and Golan Heights. Demographics Nationalism Jewish: (1945) 553,600 Nasser’s success with the U.N. (1967) 2,383,600 withdrawal from the Sinai 331% increase strengthens his belief in Egyptian Muslim: nationalism. (1945) 1,061,270 (1967) 289,600 Israel believes that only a 73% decrease preemptive war will ensure their Christian: survival as a state. (1945) 149,650 (1967) 103,100 King Hussein of Jordan and President Nasser of Egypt sign a defense pact, May 1967 31% decrease

Colin (1967) SIX-DAY WAR Primary Theories : Proxy-War-When an external, major power influences and instigates a war among other nations for personal gain. Secondary Theories : Imperialism- Aggressive expansion aimed at the establishment of foreign colonies for natural resources. Deterrence- Using the threat of power to hurt as a bargaining chip. Process: Proxy-War: USSR's confirmation of bad intelligence is often cited as the immediate cause of war. Nasser blocked Israeli shipping through the Straits of Tiran. 90% of Israeli oil was shipped through the Straits. -“We did not think that Nasser wanted war. The two divisions he sent to Sinai on May 14 would not have been sufficient to launch an offensive against Israel. He knew it and we knew it.” -Yitzhak Rabin to Le Monde , 28 February, 1968 -Did the Soviets push for this war to happen? If so, why? -If Israel knew the U.A.R was not about to initiate a war, why were they so eager to invade? Economic interests or deterrence?

Colin (1973) YOM KIPPUR WAR Nasser dies in 1970 and is succeeded by Anwar Sadat. Sadat wants a war with Israel to reclaim lost territory. In October of 1973, Egypt and Syria launch a sneak attack on Israel during the Jewish holiday of Yom Kippur. Despite early military gains by Arab forces, Israel achieved military victory. Egypt signs a separate peace with Israel to regain control of the Sinai. Nationalism Sadat views the Sinai Peninsula as core Egyptian land and wants to reclaim it. Israel maintains nationalist ideas from the preceding years. Sadat Gaddafi al-Assad