Targeting Phosphorylation Signalling Networks Stefan Knapp - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

targeting phosphorylation signalling networks
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Targeting Phosphorylation Signalling Networks Stefan Knapp - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Targeting Phosphorylation Signalling Networks Stefan Knapp Structural Genomics Consortium Phosphorylation Dependent Signalling Group Oxford University, Nuffield Department of Medicine Oxford, United Kingdom International Conference on


slide-1
SLIDE 1

SGC Oxford SGC Toronto SGC Stockholm

Targeting Phosphorylation Signalling Networks

Stefan Knapp Structural Genomics Consortium Phosphorylation Dependent Signalling Group Oxford University, Nuffield Department of Medicine Oxford, United Kingdom International Conference on Structural Genomics (ISGO) GO), Toronto, May 10-14, 2011

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Complexity of Cellular Signalling

Limited understanding of cellular signalling

  • Large number of mutations in tumours
  • Best entry point of pharmacological intervention is not known
  • Detection of an oncogenic kinase mutation does not guarantee sensitivity to inhibition

Cascades vs Networks

slide-3
SLIDE 3

(Un)-explored Kinome – what we know about the Network

Kinases:> 500 000 papers in PubMed > 10 000 US patents Coveringmainly~10% Kinome Patents followpublicdata

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Consequences

Limited understanding of cellular signalling

  • Large number of mutations in tumours
  • Best entry point of pharmacological intervention is not known
  • Detection of an oncogenic kinase mutation does not guarantee sensitivity to

inhibition

Clinical POC is main motivation for target selection

> 50% of clinical inhibitors target kinases for which inhibitors have been already approved

Unbiased Target Selection using tool molecules “probes”

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Overcoming Selectivity Problems ?

SBDD strategies

  • Out of the “Box” inhibitors (Allosteric Inhibitors, Reg. Domains)
  • Targeting inactive conformations (DFG out)
  • Targeting unique kinases
  • Targeting unique binding modes
  • Targeting unique active site features

Requirements:

  • Complex with inhibitor scaffolds with target and cross reacting kinases
  • Sufficiently large (representative) screening panel
slide-6
SLIDE 6

ATP mimetic: type I ATP competitive binding inactive conformation: type II Substrate competitive: type III

ATPsite Substrate site DFG Hinge ATP

P P P P

Upper lobe lower lobe

Kinase Inhibitors

Targeting the Active Site

Hinge

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Inhibitors Types (Type I/II)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Targeting Intermediate Conformations

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Kinase Family Wide Structural Analysis

56 Human Kinase Structures by SGC since 2004

  • 61 Structure in PDB fromAcademia
  • 42 Structures in PDB fromIndustry
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Early Parallel Screening

R1 R2 Kinase Target I n h i b i t

  • r

Subset of Kinases that can be targeted with tested scaffold ID cross reacting kinases early ~300 kinases screened

Chemical array of well characterized inhibitor selectivity Cell based Screens

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Parallel Screening of KTLs

Pyrimido-diazepines (~60 compounds made and screened against AMBIT panel (~350 kinases) CollaborationwithGray Lab, Dana Faber, Harvard

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Mechanisms of Cross-Reactivity

K00135 Originally identified as PIM1 inhibitor (hit from a purchased library / Biofocus) Main cross reactivity: ACVR1, BMPR1, CLK1, BIKE, GAK, Haspin KIT,FLT, DYRK1 Screening data ~300 kinases and 180 in DTm assay

  • Selectivity for closely related isoforms

(e.g. Pim1 vs Pim2; Clk1 vs Clk3)

  • Cross reactivity with diverse kinases
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Binding relies on 2 hydrophobic anchors

Gatekeeper :L, F or V xDFG : V, I or L

xDFG Gatekeeper Scaffold binds to two hydrophobic anchorpoints

  • No classical hinge H-bond interaction
  • ATP sites that contain xDFG anchorare very diverse
  • Some bulky ligands will not fit into all sites
  • xDFG is rarely a large

hydrophobic residue

Unique Active Site Features

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Cross-Reactivity – Non ATP mimetic

DTm>6 oC ACVR1, PIM1/3 BMPR1, CLK1, KIT, FLT DTm>4 oC BIKE, GAK, Haspin, PIM2 DRAK1, DAPK3, DYRK1/2 DTm>6 oC PIM1/3, CLK1, DAPK3, DTm>4 oC Haspin, DRAK1, DYRK1/2 DTm>6 oC PIM1/2/3, DRAK1, ACVR1 TGFBR2, LOC340156A DTm>4 oC CLK1, DAPK3, DYRK1/2 BMPR2 DTm>6 oC PIM1/3, DYRK2, CLK1, DRAK1 PIM DRAK DAPK3 CLK/ DYRK

Haspin

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Binding to Active and Inactive Conformations

Imidazo-pyridazines change orientation when bindingto active kinases

ATP mimetic binding mode

Selectivitycan be increased by avoidingbindingto ATPmimetic mode

fDFG ? Kinome wide analysis rationalizes most cross reactivity and suggests strategies for selective inhibitor development Non ATP mimetic

Mechanisms of Cross-Reactivity

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Targeting Splicing: CLK1

Selective for CLK1 (150 kinases screened by DSF & 80 kinases screened by enzymatic assays)

Collaboration : F. Bracher, University Munich

slide-17
SLIDE 17

CLK1 Regulation of TF Splicing

  • 10
  • 8
  • 6
  • 4
  • 2

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5

log(conc) responce

EC50 180 nM IC50 20 nM

  • A. Eisenreich and U. Rauch Charite Berlin

K01874 inhibits S/R phosphorylation in endothelia cells and splicing of TF.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

SRPK2 Inhibitors and Regulation of VEGF Splicing

  • SRPK1/2 suppressed HCV

replication

  • SPRK1 regulates vascular

endothelial growth factor (VEGF) splicing frompro-angiogenic to anti- angiogenic isoforms

Collaboration : D. Bates, Bristol ,UK

K02466 highly selective forSRPKs

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Targeting Unique Kinases (Haspin)

  • Low sequence homology with

ePKs (less than 20%)

  • Lack motifs that are invariant in

ePKs

  • Specific substrate: H3T3
  • Depletion of Haspin leads to:
  • Premature chromatid separation
  • Activation of spindle checkpoint
  • Block in mitosis
  • Activator of Aurora B
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Targeting Unique Kinases (Haspin)

IC50: 5nM in vitro Iodotubercidin

  • 137 kinases screened
  • Only cross reactivity that has been
  • bserved is to DYRK2 and CLK kinases
slide-21
SLIDE 21

New Approaches: Octasporines

Collaboration : E. Meggers (Marburg)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

New Approaches: Octasporines

Collaboration : E. Meggers (Marburg)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

New Approaches: Octasporines

  • Octasporines are highly potent & target selective

Collaboration : E. Meggers (Marburg)

slide-24
SLIDE 24

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

FUNDING PARTNERS Canadian Institutes for Health Research, Canadian Foundation for Innovation, Genome Canada through the Ontario Genomics Institute, GlaxoSmithKline, Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, Merck & Co., Inc., Novartis Research Foundation, Ontario Innovation Trust, Ontario Ministry for Research and Innovation, Swedish Agency for Innovation Systems, Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research, and Wellcome Trust.

www.thesgc.org

SGC Aled Edwards Chas Bountra Cheryl Arrowsmith Johan Weigelt Udo Oppermann StanNg Alice Grabbe Michelle Daniel AtulGadhave Panagis Fillipakopoulos SarahPicaud TracyKeates Ildiko Felletar BrianMarsden Minghua Wang CNRS Roscoff Laurent Meijer SGCcont. Susanne Muller-Knapp Frank von Delft Joao Muniz MartinPhilpott Oleg Fedorov Frank Niesen Tony Tumber Jing Yang GSK TimWillson Bill Zuecher DavidDrewry Oxford Chemistry Chris Schofield NathanRose Akane Kawamura Oliver King Lars Hillringhaus Esther Woon Oxford Biochemistry RobKlose Shirley Li NCGC Anton Simeonov DaveMaloney Ajit Jadhav AmyQuinn University ofMunich Franz Bracher Kilian Huber Charite, Berlin URauch

  • A. Eisenreich

Harvard James Bradner Jun Qi Andrew Kung Christopher A. French William B. Smith

  • ElizabethM. Morse

Tyler T. Hickman Michael McKeown Yuchung Wang Amanda L. Christie NathanWest Michael J. Cameron BrianSchwartz BaselUniversity Hospital Juerg Schwaller