target date funds revisited
play

Target Date Funds Revisited Alexander Michaelides Imperial College - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Target Date Funds Revisited Alexander Michaelides Imperial College London and CEPR October 2017 Alexander Michaelides (Imperial) October 2017 1 / 24 Goal Portfolio choice over different horizons is a basic ingredient of any investments


  1. Target Date Funds Revisited Alexander Michaelides Imperial College London and CEPR October 2017 Alexander Michaelides (Imperial) October 2017 1 / 24

  2. Goal Portfolio choice over different horizons is a basic ingredient of any investments class Alexander Michaelides (Imperial) October 2017 2 / 24

  3. Goal Portfolio choice over different horizons is a basic ingredient of any investments class Classic topic in finance since Samuelson and Merton contributions Alexander Michaelides (Imperial) October 2017 2 / 24

  4. Goal Portfolio choice over different horizons is a basic ingredient of any investments class Classic topic in finance since Samuelson and Merton contributions Many of the issues were stressed back then but now there are two main changes that are bringing fresh insights: Alexander Michaelides (Imperial) October 2017 2 / 24

  5. Goal Portfolio choice over different horizons is a basic ingredient of any investments class Classic topic in finance since Samuelson and Merton contributions Many of the issues were stressed back then but now there are two main changes that are bringing fresh insights: Data and Computing Power Alexander Michaelides (Imperial) October 2017 2 / 24

  6. Goal Portfolio choice over different horizons is a basic ingredient of any investments class Classic topic in finance since Samuelson and Merton contributions Many of the issues were stressed back then but now there are two main changes that are bringing fresh insights: Data and Computing Power Challenge: how can technology be harnessed towards offering scientific advice to billions of households interested in making appropriate saving and portfolio choices? Alexander Michaelides (Imperial) October 2017 2 / 24

  7. Goal Portfolio choice over different horizons is a basic ingredient of any investments class Classic topic in finance since Samuelson and Merton contributions Many of the issues were stressed back then but now there are two main changes that are bringing fresh insights: Data and Computing Power Challenge: how can technology be harnessed towards offering scientific advice to billions of households interested in making appropriate saving and portfolio choices? One early example: Financial Engines (founded by William Sharpe): https://corp.financialengines.com/ Alexander Michaelides (Imperial) October 2017 2 / 24

  8. Goal Portfolio choice over different horizons is a basic ingredient of any investments class Classic topic in finance since Samuelson and Merton contributions Many of the issues were stressed back then but now there are two main changes that are bringing fresh insights: Data and Computing Power Challenge: how can technology be harnessed towards offering scientific advice to billions of households interested in making appropriate saving and portfolio choices? One early example: Financial Engines (founded by William Sharpe): https://corp.financialengines.com/ More recently, fintech (robo advisors): http://www.investmentzen.com/best-robo-advisors Alexander Michaelides (Imperial) October 2017 2 / 24

  9. Approaches Normative: how should households make decisions? Alexander Michaelides (Imperial) October 2017 3 / 24

  10. Approaches Normative: how should households make decisions? Positive: how do households make decisions? Alexander Michaelides (Imperial) October 2017 3 / 24

  11. Approaches Normative: how should households make decisions? Positive: how do households make decisions? Rational vs psychology (behavioral) approaches: Thaler nobel prize 2017 Alexander Michaelides (Imperial) October 2017 3 / 24

  12. Approaches Normative: how should households make decisions? Positive: how do households make decisions? Rational vs psychology (behavioral) approaches: Thaler nobel prize 2017 Structural vs less structural techniques Alexander Michaelides (Imperial) October 2017 3 / 24

  13. Approaches Normative: how should households make decisions? Positive: how do households make decisions? Rational vs psychology (behavioral) approaches: Thaler nobel prize 2017 Structural vs less structural techniques All approaches are useful Alexander Michaelides (Imperial) October 2017 3 / 24

  14. Approaches Normative: how should households make decisions? Positive: how do households make decisions? Rational vs psychology (behavioral) approaches: Thaler nobel prize 2017 Structural vs less structural techniques All approaches are useful Computing power affects all approaches (data-driven or methods of solving models) Alexander Michaelides (Imperial) October 2017 3 / 24

  15. Normative Focus on normative: why normative? Alexander Michaelides (Imperial) October 2017 4 / 24

  16. Normative Focus on normative: why normative? More useful to households suddenly given “freedom to choose” either because of fiscal burden that comes with ageing, transfer of risk from firms (DB) to households (DC), or ideological reasons Alexander Michaelides (Imperial) October 2017 4 / 24

  17. Normative Focus on normative: why normative? More useful to households suddenly given “freedom to choose” either because of fiscal burden that comes with ageing, transfer of risk from firms (DB) to households (DC), or ideological reasons Could be combined with positive approaches: if defaults are pervasive (empirical finding), then how should one design the optimal default? Is that possible in a world with changing paradigms and/or structural parameters? Alexander Michaelides (Imperial) October 2017 4 / 24

  18. Normative Focus on normative: why normative? More useful to households suddenly given “freedom to choose” either because of fiscal burden that comes with ageing, transfer of risk from firms (DB) to households (DC), or ideological reasons Could be combined with positive approaches: if defaults are pervasive (empirical finding), then how should one design the optimal default? Is that possible in a world with changing paradigms and/or structural parameters? Recent work on this issue: Michaelides and Zhang (2017) and ongoing work with Francisco Gomes (LBS) and Yuxin Zhang (Renmin) Alexander Michaelides (Imperial) October 2017 4 / 24

  19. Normative: Preferences Preferences: what are appropriate household preferences? Alexander Michaelides (Imperial) October 2017 5 / 24

  20. Normative: Preferences Preferences: what are appropriate household preferences? Habit formation, prospect theory, Power utility Alexander Michaelides (Imperial) October 2017 5 / 24

  21. Normative: Preferences Preferences: what are appropriate household preferences? Habit formation, prospect theory, Power utility Focus on one particular set that has proved popular recently Alexander Michaelides (Imperial) October 2017 5 / 24

  22. Normative: Preferences Preferences: what are appropriate household preferences? Habit formation, prospect theory, Power utility Focus on one particular set that has proved popular recently Epstein-Zin-Weil preferences � � � � 1 − 1 / ψ ( 1 − β ) C 1 − 1 / ψ E t ( p t + 1 V 1 − γ t + 1 + b ( 1 − p t + 1 ) X 1 − γ 1 − γ V t = + β t + 1 ) t Alexander Michaelides (Imperial) October 2017 5 / 24

  23. Normative: Preferences Preferences: what are appropriate household preferences? Habit formation, prospect theory, Power utility Focus on one particular set that has proved popular recently Epstein-Zin-Weil preferences � � � � 1 − 1 / ψ ( 1 − β ) C 1 − 1 / ψ E t ( p t + 1 V 1 − γ t + 1 + b ( 1 − p t + 1 ) X 1 − γ 1 − γ V t = + β t + 1 ) t β is discount factor, bequest motive captured by b Alexander Michaelides (Imperial) October 2017 5 / 24

  24. Normative: Preferences Preferences: what are appropriate household preferences? Habit formation, prospect theory, Power utility Focus on one particular set that has proved popular recently Epstein-Zin-Weil preferences � � � � 1 − 1 / ψ ( 1 − β ) C 1 − 1 / ψ E t ( p t + 1 V 1 − γ t + 1 + b ( 1 − p t + 1 ) X 1 − γ 1 − γ V t = + β t + 1 ) t β is discount factor, bequest motive captured by b ψ is elasticity of intertemporal substitution Alexander Michaelides (Imperial) October 2017 5 / 24

  25. Normative: Preferences Preferences: what are appropriate household preferences? Habit formation, prospect theory, Power utility Focus on one particular set that has proved popular recently Epstein-Zin-Weil preferences � � � � 1 − 1 / ψ ( 1 − β ) C 1 − 1 / ψ E t ( p t + 1 V 1 − γ t + 1 + b ( 1 − p t + 1 ) X 1 − γ 1 − γ V t = + β t + 1 ) t β is discount factor, bequest motive captured by b ψ is elasticity of intertemporal substitution γ is relative risk aversion coefficient Alexander Michaelides (Imperial) October 2017 5 / 24

  26. Normative: Preferences Preferences: what are appropriate household preferences? Habit formation, prospect theory, Power utility Focus on one particular set that has proved popular recently Epstein-Zin-Weil preferences � � � � 1 − 1 / ψ ( 1 − β ) C 1 − 1 / ψ E t ( p t + 1 V 1 − γ t + 1 + b ( 1 − p t + 1 ) X 1 − γ 1 − γ V t = + β t + 1 ) t β is discount factor, bequest motive captured by b ψ is elasticity of intertemporal substitution γ is relative risk aversion coefficient CRRA utility is special case of this model, can accommodate long run risk. Alexander Michaelides (Imperial) October 2017 5 / 24

Recommend


More recommend